Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU...

On Saturday 24 February 2007, Jerry Amundson wrote:
> Agreed. And that's a packaging problem. The rpm should have udev
> awareness added to it so the "usual" device magic is done, even though
> the device is virtual...

that's an interesting point: usually at boot time udev detects the existance 
of several hardware devices.  i don't know how that's done, does it get some 
help from the drivers themselves?  if that's true, then the presence of the 
Xen hypervisor should imply that the xennet module should be loaded.

-- 
Javier

pgpoVCXu5CHQq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Jerry Amundson RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Jerry Amundson Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Javier Guerra <= RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\)

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Creation of additional image within a domU, john maclean

Next by Date:

[Xen-users] pcmcia modem on ttyS1 can't be initiated in a Xen environment, js

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Jerry Amundson

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\)

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]