Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU...

To:	xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU...
From:	"Jerry Amundson" <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:10:14 -0600
Delivery-date:	Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:09:40 -0800
Dkim-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JniqwAX7Yp8VwrZ9HlxqQV4gMxSDDp/V9al5svbkpOR8AK6PVssiC2TTGGaizEOMHoujeYuXLvlgcHo/0hjVQMNNQZhZVHS5Uo+4Dqj9b3u0eMLGQWpy4kbWj+yQ5wfPzwSoYeB+Y48k1aRkGaDR+fswB7VZ5XYXTchXlVKIX2E=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L2/dWf7IAWeLk+9BTqAuIs/rOntXFoR4PGTOLPAZJ0qUfc3DbwJ/OfeE5seZ5WEcbwdnNSpYFo3JLsV5RMYZSjZ5+BcU+J1HJjifDM4wxo/5OkKV87XW9d5KnJRjLgaerftQk3p0s1SN1mJzwAltvThmvEUL4btA+jDTK8Ysyyo=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D2A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D2A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d06ce20702241054q341358afl4c27d5e60fb4834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D2A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 2/24/07, Kraska, Joe A (US SSA) <joe.kraska@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Ran across this problem recently. Below attached worked for me on a
> > reboot. Still gathering "low level linux administration expertise"
> > here. Would one alternative to the modprobe.conf be to recompile the
> > domU kernel such that it needs no such modprobe entry?

> Yes, but why? Having it there keeps the install "more normal"...

Fair response. OTOH, it's not normal for me to have to make manual
modprobe.conf entries when installing a redhat OS. Will contemplate
the implications overall. Thank you.


Agreed. And that's a packaging problem. The rpm should have udev
awareness added to it so the "usual" device magic is done, even though
the device is virtual...

jerry

--
"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Jerry Amundson RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Jerry Amundson <= Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Javier Guerra RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\)