 Home |
About Xen.org |
Xen |
Xen Summit |
Wiki |
Mailing List |
Bug Tracker |
Xen Downloads |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU...
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU... |
| From: | "Jerry Amundson" <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:54:52 -0600 |
| Delivery-date: | Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:54:14 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZPPCbjTKyX14z0cUgde0F3Pgs+b36g+bquY7jBe6wDfpfksItlvdH0nZLW+urEP41+0hkOZXyCjDeuaBRq4kM36/DdWH9ynzP2qy7d3bHOmmT8kTXBXqIRmzBQ0mXCYFSLR9CeFdFCZGtL+/0+ey+BAtWyCZ0gz4n2hu8o1mSD4= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sD5fEmAoM/AAAXOx/pRmMS82EqHytkMV0VjzeMwVHOo+3rri0z+rss46FwpVteMaBne++wOqTGFvdJx7KRYNWPpKFmyWCNGPgVdGJynV51nYx3ytUeAfBGXMc3E93NisSyF6eQW+xavMvVV+bkVx04/TjgIhfn185x7421PGDYA= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D2A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <09D59AEF0405D740BDCA2FAC0E0EA97601B3D2A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 2/24/07, Kraska, Joe A (US SSA) <joe.kraska@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Ran across this problem recently. Below attached worked for me on a reboot. Still gathering "low level linux administration expertise" here. Would one alternative to the modprobe.conf be to recompile the domU kernel such that it needs no such modprobe entry? Yes, but why? Having it there keeps the install "more normal"... jerry -- "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!" _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU..., Kraska, Joe A \(US SSA\) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
xen.org, 