Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] sysenter/syscall support for 32-on-64 guests?

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] sysenter/syscall support for 32-on-64 guests?
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:49:56 -0800
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:54:14 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
I just spent quite a while working out why pvops-Xen kernels weren't booting for me in a 64-bit hypervisor. It turned out to be because 32-on-64 supports SEP even though 32-on-32 doesn't, so the guest kernel was trying to use it without having set up the Xen side, resulting in syscalls jumping to 0:0, generating a mysterious GP. Once I worked that out, the fix was simple, of course.

Anyway, I wonder if you had a specific reason for allowing this, other than "because we can"? It seems to me that we should try to minimize the number of differences between 32-on-32 and 32-on-64 as much as possible.

   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>