Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: sysenter/syscall support for 32-on-64 guests?

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: sysenter/syscall support for 32-on-64 guests?
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:19:25 -0800
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:23:49 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <47C6F9FD.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <47C6E634.3080609@xxxxxxxx> <47C6F9FD.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
Jan Beulich wrote:
Since int80 cannot be directly passed to the guest (as in 32-on-32), it
seemed reasonable to cut on the overhead of syscalls by at least
allowing this (and syscall could also be made work now that the vdso
stuff is unified in 2.6.25) - for obvious reasons it still goes through the
hypervisor, but gets there faster

I guess that's a reasonable point. But it does mean that you'd need to separately validate a 32-bit guest on both a 32 and 64-bit hypervisor, which is a bit painful. Maybe you'd need to do that anyway... (Or ignore 32-bit hosts.)

   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>