Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi, docu

To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi, documentation and libxen
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:12:10 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:11:50 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1170167387.3996.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1170167387.3996.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:29:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:

> This patch aligns vTPM support in the Xen-API, documentation and lib-xen
> (after the recent changes).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>

What's the intention here?  You've removed the get_instance calls, but not the
instance field from the documentation.  Assuming that that's just a mistake,
and you meant to remove the instance field, we're left with a VTPM class that
has nothing other than a reference to a VM and a reference to a backend
domain.  What are the semantics of that object now?

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel