Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi, docu

To: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [XEND] alignment of vtpm support in xenapi, documentation and libxen
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:53:24 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 07:54:14 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070130153240.GD3261@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 01/30/2007 10:32:40 AM:

> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 10:23:13AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
> > Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 01/30/2007 10:12:10 AM:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:29:47AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > >
> > > > This patch aligns vTPM support in the Xen-API, documentation and
> > lib-xen
> > > > (after the recent changes).
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > What's the intention here?  You've removed the get_instance calls, but
> > not the
> > > instance field from the documentation.  Assuming that that's just a
> > mistake,
> > > and you meant to remove the instance field, we're left with a VTPM class
> > that
> > > has nothing other than a reference to a VM and a reference to a backend
> > > domain.  What are the semantics of that object now?
> >
> > The instance will remain to be assigned by the hotplug scripts. In the
> > old-style of VM configuration file one could still pass it as parameter,
> > but its ignored. I rather not have it passed in as a parameter by the
> > Xen-API, either. From what I can see a getter for it is not useful,
> > either, since I want the instance number to be hidden from management
> > software.
>
> What we're left with seems like a pretty expensive way of saying "VTPM_backend
> = N".  Is there really nothing else that's configurable?  We could just put
> this into VM.other_config if that's the only thing that you need, which would
> make configuring a VTPM a lot easier.


I would like to treat the vTPM as a device like VIF and VBDs with create and destroy methods exported to management software so that a TPM device can be added to a VM similar to other devices and possibly removed when the VM is not running.

  Stefan

>
> Ewan.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel