| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related tonet
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 02:12:14AM +0100, Steven Hand wrote:
>
> >Since upgrading from 2.6.10 / xen 2.0.5 to 2.6.11 / xen 2.0-testing
> >25/05/05 I am also seeing the following in dom0 console output.
> >
> >kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
[...]
> Hmm - are you using CONFIG_HIGHMEM? This seems to be the required
> path and may have something to do with it (we've certainly seen
> nothing like this on our own E1000 boxes).
CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y
CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y
The machine currently has 2G and is unlikely to ever go above 4G.
Do I need those settings?
Rest of the config file is attached.
config-2.6.11curacaoxen0
Description: Text document
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home
xen.org, 