Re: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related tonetwork interface

[Steven Hand <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>Since upgrading from 2.6.10 / xen 2.0.5 to 2.6.11 / xen 2.0-testing
>25/05/05 I am also seeing the following in dom0 console output.
>
>kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
>kernel:  [local_bh_enable+130/144] local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90
>kernel:  [skb_checksum+317/704] skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2c0
>kernel:  [udp_poll+154/352] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160
>kernel:  [sock_poll+41/64] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
>kernel:  [do_pollfd+149/160] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0
>kernel:  [do_poll+106/208] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0
>kernel:  [sys_poll+353/576] sys_poll+0x161/0x240
>kernel:  [sys_gettimeofday+60/144] sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90
>kernel:  [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
>kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
>e1000 compiled in, and this is a 1U rackmount with onboard nics so
>changing nic is not really an option.  This did not happen with
>2.6.10/2.0.5.
>
>Any other info that would be useful?

Hmm - are you using CONFIG_HIGHMEM? This seems to be the required
path and may have something to do with it (we've certainly seen 
nothing like this on our own E1000 boxes). 


cheers,

S.



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users