Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?

To:	Ward Vandewege <ward@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:14:11 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:14:43 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20080808150957.GA24893@localdomain>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acj5aWkWp4CJ5GVcEd2xugAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122

On 8/8/08 16:09, "Ward Vandewege" <ward@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> This is likely a coreboot bug, so I'll have to track that down. Any
> information about differences between what 3.2.1 and 3.1.4 require to be
> kexec'ed into would be most helpful though.

If you specify no-real-mode in both cases then there should be no
difference. If Xen does not drop back into real mode then it cannot make use
of any legacy BIOS services.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel