Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?

To:	Ward Vandewege <ward@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:49:13 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date:	Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:49:41 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20080807131255.GA29124@localdomain>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acj4lGAHnmTg9mSHEd27qQAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] kexec regression between 3.1.0 and 3.1.3 ?
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122

On 7/8/08 14:12, "Ward Vandewege" <ward@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm using the latest version of kexec (2.0.0 from
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/horms/kexec-tools/), but I've
> also tested older kexec versions which behave in the same way.
> 
> I first observed this on real iron, but I've now set up a test environment
> with qemu which behaves identically.
> 
> Any suggestions?

Try adding no-real-mode to Xen's command line.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel