Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 09/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: remove HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFE

To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 09/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: remove HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFETIME, define no-op architecture implementations
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:48:40 -0800
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:47:57 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1172599480.3408.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070227081337.434798469@xxxxxxxx> <20070227081632.356636957@xxxxxxxx> <1172589358.3408.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45E46889.9090801@xxxxxxxx> <1172597726.3408.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45E470D6.7050401@xxxxxxxx> <1172599480.3408.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212)
James Bottomley wrote:
> Yes ... I forgot about that ... we'd need an asm/mmu_context_paravirt.h
> on every arch.
>   

Yep.  And I'm not too keen on that name; one could imagine other uses
for those hooks, even if they're being used for x86 paravirtualization
in this instance.

> I suppose this is just me being lazy ... I'm currently doing a bit of a
> rewrite in asm-parisc/mmu_context.h and I didn't want a massive merge
> conflict.
>   

Well, I'm happy to create asm-generic/mm_hooks.h or something, and
reduce all the changes to asm-*/mmu_context.h to a one-liner.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>