Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [patch 09/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: remove HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFE

To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 09/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: remove HAVE_ARCH_MM_LIFETIME, define no-op architecture implementations
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:56:38 -0800
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:55:48 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1172597726.3408.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070227081337.434798469@xxxxxxxx> <20070227081632.356636957@xxxxxxxx> <1172589358.3408.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <45E46889.9090801@xxxxxxxx> <1172597726.3408.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212)
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 09:21 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> You mean add the two stubs to asm-generic/mmu_context.h, and then
>> include that in all these files?  That would be cleaner, but it
>> wouldn't
>> remove the need to touch all these files, would it?
>>     
>
> it would if you added asm-generic/mmu_context_paravirt.h
>   

include/asm-generic isn't in the compile include path; its contents are
only ever used if they're explicitly included by some other asm/
header.  I seem to remember there was some debate about this, but I
don't really understand the rationale for the current arrangement; it
makes sense to me to have asm-generic as a set of fallback default includes.

> and only included that in the main kernel files that need the three
> operations (that's just fork.c and mmap.c, isn't it)?
>   

Yeah, it's really only two operations.  activate_mm happens in arch code
anyway, so there's no need to make a fuss about it.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>