Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:33:51 +0800
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:33:41 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C1E5053F.812F%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcdESFqDCWsISfq5RGeHgxcxVzRqmQACelaDAAAZiDAAAP4q2wADxf1QAAFVV3AAAMUYXAAACCkwAACFZyAAAV9OMAABEoucAAAWMnA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix softlockup issue after vcpu hotplug
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2007年1月30日 22:23
>
>On 30/1/07 2:11 pm, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> BTW, do you think whether it's worthy to destroy vcpu from
>> scheduler when it's down and then re-init that vcpu into scheduler
>> when it's on? I don't know whether this will make any influence to
>> accounting of scheduler. Actually domain save/restore doesn't show
>> this bug, and one obvious distinct compared to vcpu-hotplug is that
>> domain is restored in a new context...
>
>I wouldn't expect this to make any significant difference to scheduling
>accounting, certainly over a multi-second time period.
>
>Does the time you hoy-unplug the vcpu for make a difference to how
>often you
>see this problem? Did you try repro'ing with a 2.6.16 kernel?
>
> -- Keir

I can't tell, since I didn't use same pace in each round by manual 
operation. I tried both immediate plug after unplug, and a longer 
interval than 10s. But the first warning jumped out when I finished 
the test and ready to send out the 'good' news. :-(

I'll repro 2.6.16 kernel tomorrow, because remote box crashed just
now.

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>