RE: [Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161
From:	"Woller, Thomas" <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:25:57 -0600
Delivery-date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:25:56 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C1BA9989.65FE%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Accq0SL2Dj7aZnwpTKGdoklUY7dbnAAYBqi3AArkIBA=
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161

> This should be easily reproducible. I'll take a look -- I 
> expect the hpet code just needs some 'loosening' in what it accepts.
thanks. repo'ed on VT and AMD-V, but not tried on 32bpae hv.
The BUG() in the SPT common.c code is interesting. FYI, I tried adding
additional shadow_memory in guest config, but that didn't help. seems
like a domain_crash() in the hpet code causes an eventual SPT BUG(), at
least on my 2 test machines w/ 64bit hv.
 -- Tom



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel