Re: [Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161

To:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Woller, Thomas" <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:14:40 +0000
Delivery-date:	Fri, 29 Dec 2006 05:14:25 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C1BA9989.65FE%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Accq0SL2Dj7aZnwpTKGdoklUY7dbnAAYBqi3AAaDlj8=
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] SLES10 Big smp HPET domain_crash() c/s 13161
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.2.061213



On 29/12/06 10:08 am, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> This same SLES10 Big SMP kernel boots fine on a 64bit hv with a 3.0.3
>> base of code, i.e. prior to hvm hpet additions.  I tried booting this
>> guest kernel with hpet=disable but did not make a difference, and still
>> crashed at hpet.c:374. Testing is on 13161 changeset from xen-unstable.
> 
> This should be easily reproducible. I'll take a look -- I expect the hpet
> code just needs some 'loosening' in what it accepts.

Done as c/s 13187:a8b2738a6f7f. It's quite a big patch. Tested it booting
several different flavours of Linux: hopefully Windows will be as happy.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel