Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow mini-os to unbind all evtchns

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow mini-os to unbind all evtchns
From:	Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:45:41 +0100
Delivery-date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:45:42 -0800
Domainkey-signature:	s=s768; d=fujitsu-siemens.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=KTRffCODOi9LJr5NFQOAayzMZw5bxykj1MqOtUfJuwOz0qoWezn7xq/ETb5FkfZLHTWBPIJVB3D7xRKamPKXzJHGTTx4dw7WuRwjXHmvYDggedaZf6f4m6uFGBlDhj0m;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E1777@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E1777@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	KMail/1.9.5

> I'm not sure that is what Keir meant - more like: If you implement
> something, you may just as well think about any future extended features
> if it doesn't cause too much problems, for example using a bitmap
> instead of a plain array.
>
> Another solution in this case would be to search/clear the array so that
> multiple bind/unbind operations don't cause the array content to "grow".
>
>
> --
> Mats
OK, I thought that maybe mini-os should play a special role in the future and 
there are special aims with it ;-).
Thanks.

Dietmar

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel