Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow mini-os to unbind all evtchns

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Allow mini-os to unbind all evtchns
From:	Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:26:41 +0100
Cc:	Jacob Gorm Hansen <jacobg@xxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Grzegorz Milos <gm281@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:26:50 -0800
Domainkey-signature:	s=s768; d=fujitsu-siemens.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=lYoqa1DLglRSOXxHSrbeOtpGB58azd9yPStGvR1d20rjt6Cm1elkjcGZjWcSkeIaZRIPXAeQEay2l/LDzHt6VeFxWG1ebtt+YBQWhJwOROp7y7LBGVDTLg21TvELGK7R;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C1932CC1.538D%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<C1932CC1.538D%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	KMail/1.9.5

Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2006 13:25 schrieb Keir Fraser:
> ...
> It looked bogus to me. What if event channels are bound/unbound/bound
> multiple times during the mini-os lifetime (can't happen right now, but
> maybe in future). The port array will overflow. Perhaps it should be a
What does it means "maybe in future"?
Has it to do with:
> On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 13:27 +0100, Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote:
>> ...
>> ports unbound. This is necessary when using mini-os as the foundation
>> for a boot-loader.
Can anybody give me a hint!
Thanks.

Dietmar.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel