Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Updated XenMon Patch

[Rob Gardner <rob.gardner@xxxxxx>]

Jeffrey Buell wrote:

> Diwaker,
>
> I didn't mean to imply that XenMon is deficient in any way.  Only that it is
> a different kind of performance tool than, say, a function-level tool like
> Xenoprof.  XenMon works well for me now, the only suggestion I have is to
> improve the formatting of the notlive output:  some numbers are printed with
> 12 significant figures and the columns are not well-aligned.
>  
Jeff,

The idea of the not-live output was that you'd read that stuff with a 
script and parse it, so little attention was given to making it look 
pretty. But I'll see what we can do to neaten it up a bit. Thanks again 
for using the tool and providing feedback!
Rob



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel