Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?

To: "Nicholas Lee" <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:27:32 +0100
Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:27:43 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcU0VBglk4BZ++hHRKWhSqGsnjuuQAAClDYQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?
> What is the stable release policy going to be is there is a securty
> hole that a later (than current) kernel fixes?
> 
> For instance 2.0.5 has 2.6.10, whereas both 2.6.11.2 and 2.6.11 have
> mentions of security related patches.

You'll find that the vast majority of Linux security patches will apply
cleanly to one of our arch-xen kernels. 

Now that mainstream Linux has moved over to a point release scheme I
guess we could modify our build procedure to go looking to see whether
there are updates available. 
It'll just be a pain on the very rare ocasions where this breaks the
build.

It's really an issue for whoever is doing the packaging. In the
not-so-long-term, this will hopefully be an issue for the vendor of your
favourite distribution rather than us.

Ian





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>