[Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?
From:	Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 23:39:54 +1200
Delivery-date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:39:58 +0000
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aCQa9lYwsHlyTWhYtaTOVvKaWyAaFjc5S56gi/Pxq+fZsWdpU9XSCyb/fkhwSckchSxIcKQYQSwpToo1nJymT1ZqigrgHFznFPKJWOauwAJ4krxy2getYS74g0hAXfeMAYsYbrrE/4XXuZzAwxEcXBYbbwPtLoMYdzQ9/PgmhyQ=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to:	Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

What is the stable release policy going to be is there is a securty
hole that a later (than current) kernel fixes?

For instance 2.0.5 has 2.6.10, whereas both 2.6.11.2 and 2.6.11 have
mentions of security related patches.

Nicholas

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?, Nicholas Lee <= RE: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?, Ian Pratt Re: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?, Mark Williamson Re: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?, Nicholas Lee Re: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?, Mark Williamson RE: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?, Rik van Riel