From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 00:02:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:02:28 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrEq-0006S3-Ar; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:02:28 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrE4-00066w-DC for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:01:40 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265011309-4e7f00350000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 7957123F6BB for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:01:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 0ZPKPfV1NAj4c8s7 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:01:50 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1815373qyk.6 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:01:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.128.82 with SMTP id j18mr1555451qcs.61.1265011307708; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:01:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2af70f431001312340m1c878638ifc0a86b24250cade@mail.gmail.com> References: <2af70f431001312340m1c878638ifc0a86b24250cade@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:01:47 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002010001r5f45c779s548cd82ab59c61e5@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] set static ip in config file Subject: Re: [Xen-users] set static ip in config file From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: ma qiang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-qy0-f172.google.com[209.85.221.172] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265011310 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21345 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:40 PM, ma qiang wrote: > I set static ip=3D=3D192.168.1.100 in vif, but the centos in domU still > use the dhcp. =A0To be noted here, I can set static ip in centos when I > connect to the console of domU. > > Who can tell me why and how to set static ip in config file. > Thanks a lot. Short answer: that's the way it works. There are cases when setting IP in domU config file can be used (for example when deploying custom bridge+iptables script), but that's kinda complicated. The short version is that using the default setup the setting is not used and has no effect on actual domU IP address. --=20 Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 00:04:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:04:39 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrGx-0007B2-Bc; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:04:39 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrGE-0006q6-AV for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:03:54 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265011443-4216006d0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 54DE823F5EE for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:04:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (reverse.grelier.com [79.174.213.138]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id RwAlTqZVXno3AQD5 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:04:03 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: R.BERNIER@grelier.com To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Manage tape on guest win2k3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:04:02 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on svdomino/grelier(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 01/02/2010 09:04:04, Serialize complete at 01/02/2010 09:04:04 X-Barracuda-Connect: reverse.grelier.com[79.174.213.138] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265011444 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21345 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Subject: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0143248665==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --===============0143248665== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 002C50C5C12576BD_=" Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 002C50C5C12576BD_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Everybody, I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with=20 BackupExec on my guest win2k3. BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in use... I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with the=20 command "mt" on dom0... So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub have=20 no impact : module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro=20 console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0) If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !! Thanks for your answer in advance. R=E9mi Conf: Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits) --=_alternative 002C50C5C12576BD_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Everybody,

I have a problem with my magnetic ta= pe drive, I control the tape with BackupExec on my guest win2k3.
BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in  use...
I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with the command "mt" on dom0...

So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub have no impact :
module         /= boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0= :6:0)

If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !!

Thanks for your answer in advance.

R=E9mi

Conf:
Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F6= 4-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits)
 --=_alternative 002C50C5C12576BD_=-- --===============0143248665== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0143248665==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 00:10:50 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:10:50 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrMv-0008AT-Qy; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:10:49 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrMC-0007q0-KZ for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:10:04 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265011814-421600790000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-pz0-f196.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 4069223F775 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:10:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f196.google.com (mail-pz0-f196.google.com [209.85.222.196]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 1OSrLIHKCfMWI3EX for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:10:14 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: maqiang1984@gmail.com Received: by pzk34 with SMTP id 34so3867176pzk.20 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:10:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LH/I6sLBNFcAllM+UhCC6j506vHvmfH/+lDNgooQvqw=; b=canMrlI+5NOE9opSWu3shhjNZf2DH9cuFZElyd3k9MiME0fEDB72IPoHByXVOiQE2H Ogdok5/dXftPt3EWclsJ738BwdyFpZ+azobVrQpWc9ItbKbvIYCuQjbALtUQmzag7oi5 +kk74n0lHZHYRA6Me2fUdDjue0GnykFHTRfh8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NoyvURrZTmhjWGlfrZiI5j+BAbdNcXKsPQ/2LiJoVAgN9+w1TWsdfP8RdjKQZEqXNN UrXH/TLolNjN9DnF0sr2Juv4g24KCq0epuL3a/TVTeFkQQakUBuYWmrXlRt9CvGnf0m9 FvozHh0Q7Qr866IYhffeS51kV8jEOYR7BMUSM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.154.37 with SMTP id g37mr2865632wfo.316.1265011813989; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:10:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7207d96f1002010001r5f45c779s548cd82ab59c61e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <2af70f431001312340m1c878638ifc0a86b24250cade@mail.gmail.com> <7207d96f1002010001r5f45c779s548cd82ab59c61e5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:10:13 +0800 Message-ID: <2af70f431002010010y15a37ebbg5ff8629da2fc9d3e@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] set static ip in config file Subject: Re: [Xen-users] set static ip in config file From: ma qiang To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" , xen-users@lists.xensource.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-pz0-f196.google.com[209.85.222.196] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265011814 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21345 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email Cc: X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com hi, Thanks very much. I have many VMs to deploy and have to set static ip for each VM. So I want to try some methods. Can you send me some cases such as deploying custom bridge+iptables script? Best Wishes Qiang Ma On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:40 PM, ma qiang wrote: >> I set static ip=3D=3D192.168.1.100 in vif, but the centos in domU still >> use the dhcp. =A0To be noted here, I can set static ip in centos when I >> connect to the console of domU. >> >> Who can tell me why and how to set static ip in config file. >> Thanks a lot. > > Short answer: that's the way it works. > There are cases when setting IP in domU config file can be used (for > example when deploying custom bridge+iptables script), but that's > kinda complicated. The short version is that using the default setup > the setting is not used and has no effect on actual domU IP address. > > -- > Fajar > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 00:37:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:58 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrnC-0001hJ-3n; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:58 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbrmT-0001Ky-U8 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:13 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265013443-6123002f0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 2020423F7C6 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:37:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.221.172]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 1kAsdzlMgjt2ZOxp for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:23 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1822942qyk.6 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.190.83 with SMTP id dh19mr642155qcb.18.1265013443357; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2af70f431002010010y15a37ebbg5ff8629da2fc9d3e@mail.gmail.com> References: <2af70f431001312340m1c878638ifc0a86b24250cade@mail.gmail.com> <7207d96f1002010001r5f45c779s548cd82ab59c61e5@mail.gmail.com> <2af70f431002010010y15a37ebbg5ff8629da2fc9d3e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:37:23 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002010037t7abdd640v5841d749a3c607a6@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] set static ip in config file Subject: Re: [Xen-users] set static ip in config file From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: ma qiang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-qy0-f172.google.com[209.85.221.172] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265013444 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21346 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:10 PM, ma qiang wrote: > hi, > Thanks very much. > I have many VMs to deploy and have to set static ip for each VM. So I > want to try some methods. > Can you send me some cases such as deploying custom bridge+iptables script? It's not really how to DEPLOY, but how to LIMIT which IP address a domU can use with the help of ebtables. Try this thread, and see the linked post: http://markmail.org/message/kq4vnmpgwldqyv3k -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 00:39:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:39:27 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbrod-0002Uz-KA; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:39:27 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbrmf-0001Pm-0B for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:25 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265013454-421600b80000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 1A90323F7D1 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:37:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id lxjgL80rRHb8BWGw for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:34 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: grantmasterflash@gmail.com Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so3002217iwn.6 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=G8ABjpGePEwzRjQ0RqJbUBQytFRuuZCtGlOH7Tb0bgI=; b=o1SPfxSBgqTAVEUmpvHMMhDaZaWAIlhn1xMozRN0fh77XIydvqj9RSTknpx1rwdelx M+mohxAXJ8h7vrPsCCAlvgOhhKrIum8W7EIno3WaDlXBPMD6Itf3llC65/DDhOLK+J3K wtUvDlpQ8YUVHruQzoAzW7dANGBQ0IqMBWW1M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=s6GdqeOxlTx7xph7520EPBIv2bRy2eA0rqufISxRKx/D/me9NISsJSVRUrSKNyVRiD mxRHNE9zc5H3LeifO1C9FjjSj75dVYCI3iRmyHGclknuak/o0yeMv43/QfcLqcv6Kn5J 3bbiAKEExeLjN/HtKhuw7MZCZPrt9Ayphi9pw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.168.133 with SMTP id u5mr3570265iby.29.1265013454124; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:37:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2af70f431002010010y15a37ebbg5ff8629da2fc9d3e@mail.gmail.com> References: <2af70f431001312340m1c878638ifc0a86b24250cade@mail.gmail.com> <7207d96f1002010001r5f45c779s548cd82ab59c61e5@mail.gmail.com> <2af70f431002010010y15a37ebbg5ff8629da2fc9d3e@mail.gmail.com> From: Grant McWilliams Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 00:37:14 -0800 Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] set static ip in config file Subject: Re: [Xen-users] set static ip in config file To: ma qiang X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-iw0-f179.google.com[209.85.223.179] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265013455 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.01 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BSF_SC0_SA_TO_FROM_DOMAIN_MATCH, HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21346 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.01 BSF_SC0_SA_TO_FROM_DOMAIN_MATCH Sender Domain Matches Recipient Domain Cc: "Fajar A. Nugraha" , xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0469060064==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============0469060064== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504501588e91bd24047e85e51e --00504501588e91bd24047e85e51e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Best Wishes > Qiang Ma > > > Short answer: that's the way it works. > > There are cases when setting IP in domU config file can be used (for > > example when deploying custom bridge+iptables script), but that's > > kinda complicated. The short version is that using the default setup > > the setting is not used and has no effect on actual domU IP address. > > > > -- > > Fajar > > > In addition to that the CentOS kernel is not compiled with CONFIG_IP_PNP so having a DomU with the ip set in the config file will never work. It will if you recompile the kernel or use a different OS like Debian in the DomU. The CentOS kernel does pay attention to the MAC address assigned in the DomU config file though so you can set up a DHCP server with that MAC in it and it will assign the IP you want. Grant McWilliams --00504501588e91bd24047e85e51e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Best Wishes
Qiang Ma

> Short answer: that's the way it works.
> There are cases when setting IP in domU config file can be used (for > example when deploying custom bridge+iptables script), but that's<= br> > kinda complicated. The short version is that using the default setup > the setting is not used and has no effect on actual domU IP address. >
> --
> Fajar
>

In addition to that the CentOS k= ernel is not compiled with CONFIG_IP_PNP so having a DomU with
the ip s= et in the config file will never work. It will if you recompile the kernel = or use a different OS like Debian in the DomU.
The CentOS kernel does pay attention to the MAC address assigned in the Dom= U config file though so you
can set up a DHCP server with that MAC in it= and it will assign the IP you want.

Grant McWilliams
--00504501588e91bd24047e85e51e-- --===============0469060064== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0469060064==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 01:17:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:17:45 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbsPh-0004Ov-Fv; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:17:45 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbsOv-000443-Hx for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:16:57 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265015826-75bc003c0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 9193D23F703 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 01:17:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 4PJaScqPvSDPwuG1 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 01:17:06 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: groen692@grosc.com Received: from mx-av-05.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o119H3x5024623 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:17:03 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o119H3o6030076 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:17:03 +0200 Received: from [172.16.0.81] (194.219.215.33.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [194.219.215.33]) by MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o119Gs3w032547 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:16:59 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=groen692@grosc.com; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr header.from=groen692@grosc.com; sender-id=neutral Message-ID: <4B669C19.8080207@grosc.com> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:17:13 +0100 From: Jeroen Groenewegen van der Weyden User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Xen Remus and linux-ha Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: mx-out.forthnet.gr[193.92.150.104] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265015827 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21349 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] Xen Remus and linux-ha X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hello, I now have xen 4.0 running on my test servers and I'm having a look at remus. So far so good I have remus running and it switches over beautifully. However how to manage this in production environments. Anybody here knows about a xen:ocf for heartbeat/pacemaker or any other thoughts? OS: Opensuse 11.2 64 bit Xen V4.0 changeset 20873 mfg, jeroen _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 02:20:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:20:09 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbtO5-0008HB-9b; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:20:09 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbtNF-0007vv-EX for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:19:17 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265019566-2d00000d0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 5E85A23F780 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 02:19:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (mail-fx0-f215.google.com [209.85.220.215]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id jeVMNI2U8KJyT21A for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:19:26 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: peterdenhartog@gmail.com Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4736790fxm.28 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:19:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=iv7UKOE3GMWpmYudcyYAGkWi4T9kV29Fbt58C5Velrw=; b=Ll6mT598A4DZmOmY6CcCQ8OLX5uE4xcLJthrMnBC2tJ+6ABT/EhqGSiPlmTh3md51U kFSZW3sPazEH6jH7WelAFgk+/J1izL7qBofSzNXfsQ+Ja1fhnxHcCYekyhscRF/QS+bM 3VdPH6IyZdTFGgp0Ks3QNZ2L4sd9inbkrorhk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=jjl+czJ5/q2WJJHKrXwOzWfHIduFGPrAQTmnhQVaaRL+/NVp416d9L3xobxeYYyhx+ JfvbIU8kPyKTsNzHPRJ4fiDBzJvmz873l5VhvonN14+S4HpR3pEM6v4CsbGyO96+TOIU 1FElbmSCYWJ+BQ1+lvp+k4RcUMilh/Ota7DfE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.141.65 with SMTP id b1mr541091hba.66.1265019565428; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:19:25 -0800 (PST) From: Peter den Hartog Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:19:05 +0100 Message-ID: <752612c51002010219h5903bfd0p6ae7b08a4fb5babd@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: question about xen cloud configuration To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-fx0-f215.google.com[209.85.220.215] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265019567 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21352 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Subject: [Xen-users] question about xen cloud configuration X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2086569455==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============2086569455== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f20c5ed4d0b2047e875113 --001485f20c5ed4d0b2047e875113 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I've created a test server with a xen-cloud platform on it, and it's running great, i got a centos and 2 debian machines running, created from template. I was wondering if there's any easy way to extend the ram of these machine's and the size of the vdi, it got 256 mb ram and 8.xGB by default but i would like these defaults to be higher, is this changable? Rergards & thanks, Peter --001485f20c5ed4d0b2047e875113 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello,

I've created a test server with a xen-cloud p= latform on it, and it's running great, i got a centos and 2 debian mach= ines running, created from template.

I was wonderi= ng if there's any easy way to extend the ram of these machine's and= the size of the vdi, it got 256 mb ram and 8.xGB by default but i would li= ke these defaults to be higher, is this changable?

Rergards & thanks,
Peter
--001485f20c5ed4d0b2047e875113-- --===============2086569455== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============2086569455==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 02:25:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:25:05 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbtSr-00014D-5T; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:25:05 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbtRH-0000Ht-BB for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:23:27 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265019815-262e00280000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id CF9E223F93E for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 02:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (reverse.grelier.com [79.174.213.138]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id fTrUwDPg5go4kzH8 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:23:36 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: R.BERNIER@grelier.com In-Reply-To: To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:23:35 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on svdomino/grelier(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 01/02/2010 11:23:36, Serialize complete at 01/02/2010 11:23:36 X-Barracuda-Connect: reverse.grelier.com[79.174.213.138] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265019816 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21352 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1847227070==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --===============1847227070== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 003917B7C12576BD_=" Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 003917B7C12576BD_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anyone have an idea to hide a scsi device from the dom0 ? Hi Everybody,=20 I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with=20 BackupExec on my guest win2k3.=20 BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in use...=20 I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with the=20 command "mt" on dom0...=20 So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub have=20 no impact :=20 module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro=20 console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0)=20 If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !!=20 Thanks for your answer in advance.=20 R=E9mi=20 Conf:=20 Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits) =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --=_alternative 003917B7C12576BD_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Anyone have an idea to hide a scsi d= evice from the dom0 ?


Hi Everybody, =

I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with Backu= pExec on my guest win2k3.
BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in  use.= ..
I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with the command "mt" on dom0...

So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub have no impact :
module         /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D= /dev/sda1 ro console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0)

If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !!

Thanks for your answer in advance.

R=E9mi

Conf:
Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits)=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--=_alternative 003917B7C12576BD_=-- --===============1847227070== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1847227070==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 02:52:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:52:31 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbttP-0002eE-0C; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:52:31 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbtsY-0002GI-NY for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:51:38 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265021507-612201400000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from admin.tux-zentrum.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id A32431D3D9B for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 02:51:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from admin.tux-zentrum.de (static.70.203.40.188.clients.your-server.de [188.40.203.70]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id h0UFFXAr6TSlsDZ0 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:51:48 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: lists@thohal.de Received: from [192.168.178.102] (p5B2CAEF0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.44.174.240]) by admin.tux-zentrum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5C72D08A8; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:54:17 +0000 (UTC) X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 From: Thomas Halinka To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi?= BERNIER In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:51:45 +0100 Message-Id: <1265021506.3724.17.camel@sl300> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 X-Barracuda-Connect: static.70.203.40.188.clients.your-server.de[188.40.203.70] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265021508 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21354 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lists@thohal.de List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi Remi, Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 11:23 +0100 schrieb R=C3=A9mi BERNIER: >=20 > Anyone have an idea to hide a scsi device from the dom0 ? >=20 just as option - would it be possible to passthrough the whole scsi-controller to domu? This sould work, as long you dont need the scsi-card in dom0... hth, thomas >=20 > Hi Everybody,=20 >=20 > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with > BackupExec on my guest win2k3.=20 > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in > use... > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with > the command "mt" on dom0...=20 >=20 > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub > have no impact :=20 > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0) >=20 > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !! >=20 > Thanks for your answer in advance.=20 >=20 > R=C3=A9mi=20 >=20 > Conf:=20 > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86_64-xen, xen 3.4.2 > (xenbits)_______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 03:11:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:56 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbuCC-00045B-Ie; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:56 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbuBP-0003kf-Rc for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:07 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265022675-4dd700070000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id DCBA21CB91D; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:11:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (reverse.grelier.com [79.174.213.138]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id GW6A3W74mYFmXBSn; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:11:16 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: R.BERNIER@grelier.com In-Reply-To: <1265021506.3724.17.camel@sl300> To: lists@thohal.de X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:11:17 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on svdomino/grelier(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 01/02/2010 12:11:16, Serialize complete at 01/02/2010 12:11:16 X-Barracuda-Connect: reverse.grelier.com[79.174.213.138] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265022676 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21355 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com, xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0536290733==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --===============0536290733== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 003D756CC12576BD_=" Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 003D756CC12576BD_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Thomas, Yes good idea, i will try to hide the scsi-controller at boot and after=20 add the controler to the domU. Hi Remi, Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 11:23 +0100 schrieb R=E9mi BERNIER: >=20 > Anyone have an idea to hide a scsi device from the dom0 ? >=20 just as option - would it be possible to passthrough the whole scsi-controller to domu? This sould work, as long you dont need the scsi-card in dom0... hth, thomas >=20 > Hi Everybody,=20 >=20 > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with > BackupExec on my guest win2k3.=20 > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in > use... > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with > the command "mt" on dom0...=20 >=20 > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub > have no impact :=20 > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0) >=20 > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !! >=20 > Thanks for your answer in advance.=20 >=20 > R=E9mi=20 >=20 > Conf:=20 > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 > (xenbits)=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users=20 > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --=_alternative 003D756CC12576BD_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Thomas,

Yes good idea, i will try to hide the scsi-controller at boot and after add the controler to the domU.





Hi Remi,

Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 11:23 +0100 schrieb R=E9mi BERNIER:
>
> Anyone have an idea to hide a scsi device from the dom0 ?
>


just as option - would it be possible to passthrough the whole
scsi-controller to domu?

This sould work, as long you dont need the scsi-card in dom0...

hth,

thomas


>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with<= br> > BackupExec on my guest win2k3.
> BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in
>  use...
> I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with > the command "mt" on dom0...
>
> So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub
> have no impact :
> module         /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro
> console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0)
>
> If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !!
>
> Thanks for your answer in advance.
>
> R=E9mi
>
> Conf:
> Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2
> (xenbits)=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--=_alternative 003D756CC12576BD_=-- --===============0536290733== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0536290733==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 03:15:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:15:41 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbuFp-0005aY-Gc; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:15:41 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Naa21-0002TG-8d for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:27:57 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1264706883-751400400000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from engine29-1277-4.icritical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with SMTP id 7926223D36E for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:28:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from engine29-1277-4.icritical.com (engine29-1277-4.icritical.com [212.57.248.93]) by spam.xensource.com with SMTP id WByJ9LLBxCexmEef for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:28:03 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: peter.chiu@stfc.ac.uk Received: (qmail 31284 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2010 19:28:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) by engine29-1277-4.icritical.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2010 19:28:25 -0000 Received: from engine29-1277-4.icritical.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (engine29-1277-4.icritical.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with SMTP id 29355-03 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:28:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 31235 invoked by uid 599); 28 Jan 2010 19:28:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchangegw1.rl.ac.uk) (130.246.135.148) by engine29-1277-4.icritical.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:28:17 +0000 Received: from EXCHANGE19.fed.cclrc.ac.uk ([172.16.133.19]) by exchangegw1.rl.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:27:53 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Full Virtualised DomU Hang on Boot Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:27:52 -0000 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Full Virtualised DomU Hang on Boot Thread-Index: AcqgUBVZjXXv3JK/RWG7JbQJtEGKpw== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2010 19:27:53.0404 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC9627C0:01CAA04F] X-Virus-Scanned: by iCritical at engine29-1277-4.icritical.com X-Barracuda-Connect: engine29-1277-4.icritical.com[212.57.248.93] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1264706884 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21025 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:14:44 -0800 Cc: peter.chiu@stfc.ac.uk Subject: [Xen-users] Full Virtualised DomU Hang on Boot X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1646555302==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1646555302== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAA04F.FC37D9EB" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAA04F.FC37D9EB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On an DELL R710 server, I mounted OpenSuse 11.2 (86-64) with the xen kernel 2.6.31.8-0.1-xen. =20 I am trying to replicate an existing Red Hat Enterprise AS 3 (Taroon) 32-bit with kernel 2.4.21-57.ELsmp as a DomU. =20 Having done the dd of the entire system disk into an image, and use yast2 to set up a full virtualisation guest configure file, I then start up the guest. =20 On the console it only shows up: apricot:/etc/xen/vm # xm create -c ignis Using config file "./ignis". Started domain ignis (id=3D23) =20 Then using vncviewer :5900, it returns a window that continues with the start up. Booting 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (2.4.21-57-Elsmp)' =20 root (hd0,1) Fileysystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.21-57.ELsmp ro root=3D/dev/sda2 [Linux-bzImage, setup=3D0x1400, size=3D0x14d31e] initrd /boot/initrd-2.4.21-57.ELsmp.img =20 After this, the guest makes no further progress. =20 Below is the configuration file on the guest. =20 I can mount the guest image using the loop device, check the files, and can chroot to it okay. =20 It looks as if it is waiting for the operating system disk to continue. Does any have any idea how to investigate this? =20 Many thanks. =20 Peter Chiu =20 STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory UK =20 /etc/xen/vm/ignis name=3D"ignis" uuid=3D"94259271-5e1f-2058-66c7-f91df8fb4f28" memory=3D2048 maxmem=3D4096 vcpus=3D1 on_poweroff=3D"destroy" on_reboot=3D"restart" on_crash=3D"destroy" localtime=3D0 =20 builder=3D"hvm" extid=3D0 device_model=3D"/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm" kernel=3D"/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader" boot=3D"c" disk=3D[ 'tap:aio:/disks/apricot1/xen/ignis,hda,w', ] vif=3D[ 'bridge=3Dbr0,model=3Drtl8139', ] stdvga=3D0 vnc=3D1 vncunused=3D1 apic=3D1 acpi=3D1 pae=3D1 =20 serial=3D"pty" -- =0AScanned by iCritical.=0A ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAA04F.FC37D9EB Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On an DELL R710 server, I mounted OpenSuse 11.2 = (86-64) with the xen kernel 2.6.31.8-0.1-xen.

 

I am trying to replicate an existing Red Hat = Enterprise AS 3 (Taroon) 32-bit with kernel 2.4.21-57.ELsmp as a DomU.

 

Having done the dd of the entire system disk into = an image, and use yast2 to set up a full virtualisation guest configure = file,

I then start up the guest.

 

On the console it only shows up:

apricot:/etc/xen/vm # xm create -c = ignis

Using config file = "./ignis".

Started domain ignis (id=3D23)

 

Then using vncviewer :5900, it returns a window = that continues with the start up.

  Booting ‘Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS (2.4.21-57-Elsmp)’

 

root (hd0,1)

 Fileysystem type is ext2fs, partition type = 0x83

kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.21-57.ELsmp ro = root=3D/dev/sda2

  [Linux-bzImage, setup=3D0x1400, = size=3D0x14d31e]

initrd = /boot/initrd-2.4.21-57.ELsmp.img

 

After this, the guest makes no further = progress.

 

Below is the configuration file on the = guest.

 

I can mount the guest image using the loop device, = check the files, and can chroot to it okay.

 

It looks as if it is waiting for the operating = system disk to continue.

Does any have any idea how to investigate = this?

 

Many thanks.

 

Peter Chiu

 

STFC Rutherford Appleton = Laboratory

UK

 

/etc/xen/vm/ignis

name=3D"ignis"

uuid=3D"94259271-5e1f-2058-66c7-f91df8fb4f28"=

memory=3D2048

maxmem=3D4096

vcpus=3D1

on_poweroff=3D"destroy"

on_reboot=3D"restart"

on_crash=3D"destroy"

localtime=3D0

 

builder=3D"hvm"

extid=3D0

device_model=3D"/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm"

kernel=3D"/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader"

boot=3D"c"

disk=3D[ 'tap:aio:/disks/apricot1/xen/ignis,hda,w', = ]

vif=3D[ 'bridge=3Dbr0,model=3Drtl8139', = ]

stdvga=3D0

vnc=3D1

vncunused=3D1

apic=3D1

acpi=3D1

pae=3D1

 

serial=3D"pty"


=

-- =0A
Scanned by iCritical.=0A


= ------_=_NextPart_001_01CAA04F.FC37D9EB-- --===============1646555302== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1646555302==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 03:17:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:17:14 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbuHK-0006Ib-OD; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:17:14 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NasPA-0004nG-GE for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:05:04 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1264777512-4a0d008f0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mailgate.intershop.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 6A81023DFE2 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:05:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailgate.intershop.de (mailgate.intershop.de [217.17.202.241]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id ZH3RqiUtqqqa0VJf (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 07:05:13 -0800 (P X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: R.Sokoll@intershop.de Received: from JENMAIL01.ad.intershop.net ([10.0.87.43]) by mailgate.intershop.de (8.14.3/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o0TF5355024065 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:05:05 +0100 Received: from jenmailowa02.ad.intershop.net ([217.17.202.227]) by JENMAIL01.ad.intershop.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:05:03 +0100 Received: from [10.0.88.158] ([10.0.88.158]) by jenmailowa02.ad.intershop.net over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:05:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4B62F91E.50008@intershop.de> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:05:02 +0100 From: Rainer Sokoll User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Xen User-List X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Issues with Xen and iptables Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Issues with Xen and iptables References: <20100129092932.GB4838@j.intershop.de> <7207d96f1001290534q300a4264n9f3f5199138e7a9f@mail.gmail.com> <20100129135556.GB6901@j.intershop.de> <7207d96f1001290609s447b2deanb7dff725ea67a116@mail.gmail.com> <20100129144112.GA9155@j.intershop.de> In-Reply-To: <20100129144112.GA9155@j.intershop.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jan 2010 15:05:03.0476 (UTC) FILETIME=[6F63DB40:01CAA0F4] X-Barracuda-Connect: mailgate.intershop.de[217.17.202.241] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1264777514 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.58 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.58 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=MISSING_HEADERS X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21097 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.58 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:14:44 -0800 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Rainer Sokoll schrieb: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 09:09:23PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > >> You might want to try changing the NAT conditions from using "-o eth2" >> to simply using --source and --destination first, with MASQUARADE for >> simplicity and easy-debugging. A colleague had some problems a while >> back, turned out he uses the wrong interface for "-o". > > If I follow your instructions, I see the natted (yeah!) packets on > vif0.1 - but nothing on eth2 (where the default route sits) - for both > SNAT and MASQUERADE. It is getting more strange: brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.000000000000 no xenbr1 8000.00ff746a4f25 no vif0.1 peth1 vif1.0 tap0 As said, if I tcpdump on vif0.1, I see natted packets. But if I tcpdump on xenbr0, I see the same packets, but not natted. I worry that I am missing something fundamental :-( Rainer _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 03:18:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:18:38 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbuIf-00070k-Sb; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:18:37 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nac6R-0002W0-GX for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:39 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1264714841-605700170000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from kuber.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 413B523D00C for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id BbHWBGbSQjs7BWJi (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:42 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bounces@nabble.com Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nac6T-00087m-79 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:41 -0800 Message-ID: <27362803.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:40:41 -0800 (PST) From: Tom80112 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [Xen-users] How do I configure Virtual machines to DHCP from network instead of Dom0 ?? Subject: [Xen-users] How do I configure Virtual machines to DHCP from network instead of Dom0 ?? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: nezwek@yahoo.com X-Barracuda-Connect: kuber.nabble.com[216.139.236.158] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1264714842 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.41 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.41 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21035 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.41 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:14:45 -0800 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com I have a XEN Dom0 set up with CentOS5.4 # xm list Name ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 2048 1 r----- 43564.6 Guest1_CentOS5.3 3 511 1 -b---- 1153.4 Guest2_CentOS5.3 5 511 1 -b---- 1189.9 Guest3_CentOS5.3 8 511 1 -b---- 1245.0 Guest4_CentOS5.3 13 511 1 -b---- 888.2 Dom0 grabbed an IP address from our network using DHCP. Great! But the 4 virtual Guest machines did not grab a DHCP address from our network. I think these 4 virtual Guest machines grabbed their DHCP addresses from Dom0. The 4 virtual Guest machines DHCP'd addresses as: 192.168.122.xxx How do I get these 4 virtual Guest machines to DHCP from the network like Dom0 did?? Thanks Tom -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-do-I-configure-Virtual-machines-to-DHCP-from-network-instead-of-Dom0----tp27362803p27362803.html Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 03:19:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:19:57 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbuJx-0007i8-J5; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:19:57 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaedW-0005Nv-Cy for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:22:58 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1264724587-44f8000f0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from fedecks.wujiman.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 079BF23D74F; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:23:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from fedecks.wujiman.net (pegleg1.infonet.cz [212.71.128.158]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id VdiNqtGpTQ2IOrqm; Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:23:07 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: martin.kraus@wujiman.net Received: from finrod.wujiman.net (119.45.broadband14.iol.cz [90.181.45.119]) (Authenticated sender: martin.kraus@wujiman.net) by fedecks.wujiman.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FD7E209E5; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:23:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by finrod.wujiman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D9715641DD; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:23:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:23:06 +0100 From: Martin Kraus To: Keir Fraser X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.4.2 hypervisor crash, Cannot access memory beyond end of bootstrap direct-map area, Unknown interrupt Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.4.2 hypervisor crash, Cannot access memory beyond end of bootstrap direct-map area, Unknown interrupt Message-ID: <20100129002306.GG32726@finrod> References: <20100128211616.GE2861@reaktio.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operatin-System: 2.6.32-1 i686 GNU/Linux X-PGP-Key: http://martin.infonet.cz/pub/martin_kraus_pubkey.asc X-PGP-KeyID: B792A430 X-PGP-Keyservers: hkp://pgp.ms.mff.cuni.cz ldap://keyserver.pgp.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Barracuda-Connect: pegleg1.infonet.cz[212.71.128.158] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1264724588 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21045 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:14:45 -0800 Cc: Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro , Gabor Szilagyi , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , xen-users X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:04:15PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: > No, it'll be a 32-bit-specific issue though. I would recommend just running > a 64-bit build of Xen, if the CPU supports 64-bit mode. It'll be something > to do with GRUB2 dumping the dom0 kernel and initrd higher in memory than > GRUB1, past the end of where 32-bit Xen is set up to be able to access. > Probably not a hard fix, although I have no GRUB2 installation to test with. I've had this problem for a year now. The only xen version running is 3.0.3, newer versions crash with this error message. I've seen few posts about this but no replies. It might be related to grub2. I've tried grub2 from debian sid today and even xen 3.0.3 stopped working, I had to downgrade back to stable grub2 debian version. mk _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 03:21:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:21:20 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbuLI-0008QT-Bp; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:21:20 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nb0Bp-0005Sd-21 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:23:49 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1264807438-12c700440000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id CFE0923E3B2 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:23:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.145]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id buSW2YS30TIRMtbA for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:23:58 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: arnjay@gmail.com Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 26so526751eyw.8 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:23:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cCUYQvD4S41Um1oNRgo0uIDGYCY6xet0SGt63xhYCfU=; b=Fo/yuUerWk+F7xqsc5n7agfGN8e2fmOBk4FmoaBeimoFWy9h89ILL9cb05Jljh3Yl/ C0mUGfG/ez9iDP/IdKzDhgs+OvcKWbPGwZjvYeoPisDZD08J3MWJB4XcsJkKeedyIWZ4 1oThZjp3S76LCozr8fapxr0VZRgZujK4QooKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NRgmBBvXWPTi+/Ua/ab5L1ojWXoA/ZkE0/uZLaLUZ4+LWAxs9zWEHjmD8ML4XaD0tj zwpFgMcFbxlj9b6IPFcgZck3wweQ/5/Tu0BbfmWXy5qTtB196IYdKsNyJM4psuYsPpQL HzN1h98dZV82hjm/dzexnztQo6zz6wS8rJoYk= Received: by 10.213.2.79 with SMTP id 15mr1454431ebi.59.1264807437228; Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.1? (81-67-106-66.rev.numericable.fr [81.67.106.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm4941811eyd.45.2010.01.29.15.23.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:23:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B636E0B.4090204@free.fr> Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:23:55 +0100 From: Arnaud Jayet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: DHCP and DomUs troubles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: ey-out-1920.google.com[74.125.78.145] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1264807438 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21129 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:14:45 -0800 Subject: [Xen-users] DHCP and DomUs troubles X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hello, i've set up a domU (called 'gwdomu') for acting as a router (NAT + dhcp + firewall services) for a private LAN of machines. i've installed dnsmasq package on this domU 1) with as physical machine client in the LAN, it works : the PC gets an IP address from dnsmasq / gwdomu, and can go outside via 'gwdomu' 2) with a Xen virtual machine client (i called it 'clientdomu'), it doesn't work. 'gwdomu' received several DHCPDiscover requests from 'clientdomu' and send DHCPOFFER to the client mac address but never received DHCPREQUEST / DHCPACK from the client notes : 1) i'm using VLAN 2) i'm using Debian Lenny + Xen 3.2-1 for Dom0 and DomU 3) In the 'clientdomu' /etc/network/interfaces i've added the option post-up ethtool -K eth0 tx off but with no effect... i also put tx off in dom0 ethX interface with no more effect. trace : domu's config file # vlan115 vif = [ 'mac=00:16:3E:7F:BF:11,bridge=xenbr115' ] dhcp = "on" clientdomu# cat /etc/net/interfaces auto eth0 iface eth0 inet dhcp post-up ethtool -K eth0 tx off clientdomu# ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 clientdomu# dhclient eth0 Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.1.1 Copyright 2004-2008 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ Listening on LPF/eth0/00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Sending on LPF/eth0/00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Sending on Socket/fallback DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 6 DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8 DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 10 DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 19 DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 18 5 bad udp checksums in 5 packets No DHCPOFFERS received. No working leases in persistent database - sleeping. ---- gwdomu with dnsmasq activated (tail syslog) with a DHCP domU: Jan 30 00:03:41 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPOFFER(eth0) 192.168.115.107 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Jan 30 00:03:46 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Jan 30 00:03:46 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPOFFER(eth0) 192.168.115.107 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Jan 30 00:04:29 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Jan 30 00:04:29 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPOFFER(eth0) 192.168.115.107 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Jan 30 00:04:30 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Jan 30 00:04:30 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPOFFER(eth0) 192.168.115.107 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Jan 30 00:04:38 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 Jan 30 00:04:38 gwnat dnsmasq[27902]: DHCPOFFER(eth0) 192.168.115.107 00:16:3e:7f:bf:11 gwdomu with dnsmasq activated (tail syslog) with a DHCP physical PC: Jan 29 13:01:41 gwnat dnsmasq[16634]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) 00:04:75:d1:37:49 Jan 29 13:01:41 gwnat dnsmasq[16634]: DHCPOFFER(eth0) 192.168.115.104 00:04:75:d1:37:49 Jan 29 13:01:41 gwnat dnsmasq[16634]: DHCPREQUEST(eth0) 192.168.115.104 00:04:75:d1:37:49 Jan 29 13:01:41 gwnat dnsmasq[16634]: DHCPACK(eth0) 192.168.115.104 00:04:75:d1:37:49 kodos any idea ? thank you for your help Arnaud _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 03:38:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:38:28 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbubs-0001Th-5w; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:38:28 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbubA-00018M-8B for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:37:44 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265024272-4dd800530000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 004D723FA75 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [81.174.135.208]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id ikMjnDE2g6qjhARs for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:37:53 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: linux@thehobsons.co.uk Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2522A23C0F4 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:37:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0NyhCqV+XX3 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:37:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simon.thehobsons.co.uk (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [192.168.0.33]) by patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AAC23C0F3 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:37:48 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 11:37:33 +0000 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com From: Simon Hobson X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Heavy Dom0 traffic stops network Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Heavy Dom0 traffic stops network Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Barracuda-Connect: patsy.thehobsons.co.uk[81.174.135.208] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265024274 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.20 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.20 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BSF_SC0_SA074b X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21355 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.20 BSF_SC0_SA074b Custom Rule SA074b X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On 11/10/09, I wrote: >I've just experienced a rather strange one ... > >I was trying to create a new DomU using debootstrap as I've done >before - and everything stopped, quickly followed by a voice from >downstairs asking why the internet had stopped ! This first happened >yesterday, and assuming I'd perhaps managed some form of resource >exhaustion I rebooted the system. > >Today I tried again (but without the "when will it be working ?" >from downstairs) and found this. > >If I do a ping from my laptop to a DomU, then the responses just >stop a short while after I hit the network from Dom0 (it only takes >a few MB). If I stop the traffic and wait, then it all comes back >again after about 5 minutes : > >64 bytes from 192.168.0.34: icmp_seq=465 ttl=64 time=0.290 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.0.34: icmp_seq=466 ttl=64 time=0.292 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.0.34: icmp_seq=467 ttl=64 time=0.338 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.0.34: icmp_seq=468 ttl=64 time=297024.510 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.0.34: icmp_seq=469 ttl=64 time=296024.293 ms >64 bytes from 192.168.0.34: icmp_seq=470 ttl=64 time=295024.138 ms >Note that packets don't seem to have been lost, just queued up. > >"brctl showmacs eth0" shows MAC addresses aging in the bridge. > >Dom0 has one bridge on the inside network, internet access is via a >router running in a DomU with external ethernet interface made >available to it via pciback. > >Dom0 is Debian Etch, linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 2.6.18.dfsg.1-23etch1 >running on xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 3.2.1-2~bpo4+1 > >The guests are running Lenny. > >Nothing appears to be logged when the problem happens. Any ideas ? I've now hit this one at work. In this case, it's a four core Xeon - and I've tried pinning Dom-0 to core 0, and the guests to cores 1-3. I've further found that if I kill the transfer then networking returns instantly. So I can run a network intensive transfer (rsync) while watching the pings - the pings stop, I hit ctrl-c, the pings recover with no dropped packets. Dom-0 is running Debian Lenny linux-image-2.6.18-6-xen-686 (2.6.18.dfsg.1-22) and xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386 (3.2.1-2) Dom-U is running Lenny and the same kernel. It's also storing the data on an iSCSI volume (iSCSI handled by Dom0 and exported to DomU). However, it's not just traffic from Dom0 to DomU that does it. I've got a big transfer going from another machine copying large amounts of data to the same DomU - and ping is showing occasional dropped packets. So, anyone got hints on what;s causing it, and more importantly, how to fix it ? -- Simon Hobson WANTED: "Software CD ROM Kit" for Canon CLBP 360-PS printer (Canon part no RH6-3612, or possibly RH6-3810, or RH6-3610 might do). I've a dead HD and need this CD so I can replace the disk and re-install the printer OS on it. If anyone knows where I might get hold of one I'd be grateful - requests to Canon drew a blank, it's been out of support for years. Alternatively, if anyone has one of these and would let me image their hard disk ... Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 04:01:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:01:29 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbuy9-0003Fv-8J; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:01:29 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbuxJ-0002st-OA for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:00:37 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265025646-6b4800080000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 9736D23F7FF for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 04:00:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (mail-fx0-f215.google.com [209.85.220.215]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id f4TGNBGfuzhw7Ic2 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:00:47 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: email.ahmedkamal@googlemail.com Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4849362fxm.28 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:00:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BuOoNrEt+Cz/MteL5uQpz+/LFCAKkXcR6c44FDYit/M=; b=d18tYVdsLjrgtfWtSryVZkS4bvOzMqibUmYalxmYF+iCfxr0yLuDf7yrDtXBJmXTQW cMJSpU/hlchSSJkP6exSZUKQHsrt8Fd86udIw0yHL40gwDX+Zorpq2Rf11HugW/wxeyC UXwinwwl6R2ar3OvD31A/xD++ST7Is5Be1tqk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=F1MEOIUCleE+WNhZwlPFqcwZebZn5cA3Q85+ZiI4z4boBVyoXuhVVHSpNJSB1ZhMO8 ZPBx8SymIeSZKqUqBEXdCftgZ4f3ahLWLxp7++SaeXZ6eZm8DbVNZ3/rcvrJzSr+yroJ w0LD3S0AziVC1N8Y8YADwrtHCuEu6OppQwFXY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.164.75 with SMTP id d11mr4149288fay.68.1265025645622; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:00:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <752612c51002010219h5903bfd0p6ae7b08a4fb5babd@mail.gmail.com> References: <752612c51002010219h5903bfd0p6ae7b08a4fb5babd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:00:44 +0200 Message-ID: <3da3b5b41002010400h28704953g77f816c073824c5e@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] question about xen cloud configuration Subject: Re: [Xen-users] question about xen cloud configuration From: Ahmed Kamal To: Peter den Hartog X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-fx0-f215.google.com[209.85.220.215] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265025647 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21357 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1311307088==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1311307088== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163646dbdc3d54d5047e88bc4a --00163646dbdc3d54d5047e88bc4a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sure thing, power the VM off, and to change it to 768MB .. I'd use xe vm-param-set uuid= memory-static-max=768000000 xe vm-param-set uuid= memory-dynamic-max=768000000 Regards On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Peter den Hartog wrote: > Hello, > > I've created a test server with a xen-cloud platform on it, and it's > running great, i got a centos and 2 debian machines running, created from > template. > > I was wondering if there's any easy way to extend the ram of these > machine's and the size of the vdi, it got 256 mb ram and 8.xGB by default > but i would like these defaults to be higher, is this changable? > > Rergards & thanks, > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > --00163646dbdc3d54d5047e88bc4a Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sure thing, power the VM off, and to change it to 768MB ..= I'd use

xe vm-param-set =A0uuid=3D<put-uuid-here&= gt;=A0=A0memory-static-max=3D768000000
xe vm-param-set =A0uuid=3D= <put-uuid-here> =A0memory-dynamic-max=3D768000000

Regards

On Mon, Feb= 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Peter den Hartog <peterdenhartog@gmail.com> wrote= :
Hello,

I've created = a test server with a xen-cloud platform on it, and it's running great, = i got a centos and 2 debian machines running, created from template.

I was wondering if there's any easy way to extend t= he ram of these machine's and the size of the vdi, it got 256 mb ram an= d 8.xGB by default but i would like these defaults to be higher, is this ch= angable?

Rergards & thanks,
Peter

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.= com
http://l= ists.xensource.com/xen-users

--00163646dbdc3d54d5047e88bc4a-- --===============1311307088== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1311307088==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 04:36:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:36:44 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbvWG-00055Z-EM; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:36:44 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbvVU-0004jy-Ds for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:35:56 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265027766-078000170000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 7084323FA41 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 04:36:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (mail-qy0-f171.google.com [209.85.221.171]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id s90DnWzVkN2YNUGf for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:36:06 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so47843qyk.0 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:36:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.20.77 with SMTP id e13mr1698146qcb.14.1265027765638; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:36:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B62F91E.50008@intershop.de> References: <20100129092932.GB4838@j.intershop.de> <7207d96f1001290534q300a4264n9f3f5199138e7a9f@mail.gmail.com> <20100129135556.GB6901@j.intershop.de> <7207d96f1001290609s447b2deanb7dff725ea67a116@mail.gmail.com> <20100129144112.GA9155@j.intershop.de> <4B62F91E.50008@intershop.de> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:36:05 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002010436l611700bbjbb44498ffeb56932@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Issues with Xen and iptables Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Issues with Xen and iptables From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Rainer Sokoll Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-qy0-f171.google.com[209.85.221.171] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265027766 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21359 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: Xen User-List X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Rainer Sokoll wro= te: > Rainer Sokoll schrieb: >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 09:09:23PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> >>> You might want to try changing the NAT conditions from using "-o eth2" >>> to simply using --source and --destination first, with MASQUARADE for >>> simplicity and easy-debugging. A colleague had some problems a while >>> back, turned out he uses the wrong interface for "-o". >> >> If I follow your instructions, I see the natted (yeah!) packets on >> vif0.1 - but nothing on eth2 (where the default route sits) - for both >> SNAT and MASQUERADE. > > It is getting more strange: > > brctl show > bridge name =A0 =A0 bridge id =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 STP enabled =A0= =A0 interfaces > xenbr0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A08000.000000000000 =A0 =A0 =A0 no > xenbr1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A08000.00ff746a4f25 =A0 =A0 =A0 no =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0vif0.1 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0peth1 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0vif1.0 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0tap0 That is weird. Usually xenbr0 is connected to vif0.0 and peth0. Did you change the default network-bridge script? > > As said, if I tcpdump on vif0.1, I see natted packets. But if I tcpdump > on xenbr0, I see the same packets, but not natted. That usually means packets come in (or originating from) xenbr0, and routed to eth1 (thus mirrored to vif0.0, and go out the wire from peth1) > I worry that I am missing something fundamental :-( What packets are you using to test, ping from the dom0? from domU? from other hosts on the network? To where? At this point I'd have to say a complete description of your network might be necessary. netstat -nr, iptables -nL, iptables -nL -t nat, and so on. Without that it's hard to diagnose further. In any case, this is not really xen-specific issue (although the bridge setup might make it a little bit more confusing). You might find it easier to use domU as router/firewall. --=20 Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 04:39:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:39:06 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbvYY-0005rN-KO; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:39:06 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbvXf-0005VO-92 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:38:11 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265027899-5e4a00860000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id D642E23FB06 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 04:38:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (mail-fx0-f215.google.com [209.85.220.215]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id cjP8RmgSW6f49rxu for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:38:19 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: peterdenhartog@gmail.com Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4892808fxm.28 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:38:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Wwbyay4hmQ6wfV+NFocd7z9l8PsXskCGQ/XPaGLnvDs=; b=uat7Xgv+e+Q1YRvud1D1wFL9EVsAkQBeBWwH+23X6GiHA2CQJUHlMIaxso/y5TmR78 FJO9NwlpM9zovt+EbYJWm3WUVwZzuPe04jI9i2PrD2sqz+dOUubocr6Kj4meMsOt67+A 2I/Szgqqv7v49BtT12/YG7Xcd/hDHZ/Qpbcbc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=gm/myslmYROjTaYioejZZThR2gTmvzoJZJ3E6cyQc4ICdaAFn5FFQ1jut52zJHiMSH 3C8yHj7uQkWH7cccZ5aNXNNE4tGrePp/rZt7rlqJBQrFHroqBKUGKLNNBsJWhKbNqPzp WA+bl5rZvELTKURm6toApExHrLR5muUqGY1AE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.188.6 with SMTP id n6mr637035hbh.147.1265027898177; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:38:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3da3b5b41002010400h28704953g77f816c073824c5e@mail.gmail.com> References: <752612c51002010219h5903bfd0p6ae7b08a4fb5babd@mail.gmail.com> <3da3b5b41002010400h28704953g77f816c073824c5e@mail.gmail.com> From: Peter den Hartog Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:37:58 +0100 Message-ID: <752612c51002010437x3932243dl2aba713fa0430a43@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] question about xen cloud configuration Subject: Re: [Xen-users] question about xen cloud configuration To: Ahmed Kamal X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-fx0-f215.google.com[209.85.220.215] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265027899 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21359 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0650601767==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============0650601767== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f62994807a9c047e894266 --001485f62994807a9c047e894266 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 thanks! that worked great, do you have any idea's for making the vdi (the hardisk of the vm) bigger? ti's 8.x GB by default but i would like it to be 30 GB. Regards & thanks, Peter On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ahmed Kamal wrote: > Sure thing, power the VM off, and to change it to 768MB .. I'd use > > xe vm-param-set uuid= memory-static-max=768000000 > xe vm-param-set uuid= memory-dynamic-max=768000000 > > Regards > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Peter den Hartog < > peterdenhartog@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I've created a test server with a xen-cloud platform on it, and it's >> running great, i got a centos and 2 debian machines running, created from >> template. >> >> I was wondering if there's any easy way to extend the ram of these >> machine's and the size of the vdi, it got 256 mb ram and 8.xGB by default >> but i would like these defaults to be higher, is this changable? >> >> Rergards & thanks, >> Peter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >> > > -- Groet // Kind regards, Peter den Hartog --001485f62994807a9c047e894266 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable thanks! =A0that worked great, do you have any idea's for making the vdi= (the hardisk of the vm) bigger? ti's 8.x GB by default but i would lik= e it to be 30 GB.

Regards & thanks,
Peter<= br>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ahmed Kamal = <em= ail.ahmedkamal@googlemail.com> wrote:
Sure thing, power the VM off, and to change it to 768MB ..= I'd use

xe vm-param-set =A0uuid=3D<put-uuid-here&= gt;=A0=A0memory-static-max=3D768000000
xe vm-param-set =A0uuid=3D= <put-uuid-here> =A0memory-dynamic-max=3D768000000

Regards

<= /div>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Peter den Hartog <peterdenhartog@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,

I've created a test server with a xen-cloud= platform on it, and it's running great, i got a centos and 2 debian ma= chines running, created from template.

I was wondering if there's any easy way to extend t= he ram of these machine's and the size of the vdi, it got 256 mb ram an= d 8.xGB by default but i would like these defaults to be higher, is this ch= angable?

Rergards & thanks,
Peter

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-user= s@lists.xensource.com
http://l= ists.xensource.com/xen-users




--
Groet // Kind regards,<= br>Peter den Hartog

--001485f62994807a9c047e894266-- --===============0650601767== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0650601767==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 04:43:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:43:03 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbvcN-0007Af-23; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:43:03 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbvbe-0006ph-9B for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:42:18 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265028148-0d4400280000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 7809E23F90F for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 04:42:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.144]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id Pgu3UYeU3oUXuphH for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:42:28 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so677043qwf.42 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:42:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.55.69 with SMTP id t5mr1679471qcg.34.1265028147656; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:42:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:42:27 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002010442m5a8549e2w8ec657b395da6511@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Heavy Dom0 traffic stops network Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Heavy Dom0 traffic stops network From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Simon Hobson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: qw-out-1920.google.com[74.125.92.144] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265028148 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21360 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Simon Hobson wrote: > However, it's not just traffic from Dom0 to DomU that does it. I've got a > big transfer going from another machine copying large amounts of data to the > same DomU - and ping is showing occasional dropped packets. > > > So, anyone got hints on what;s causing it, and more importantly, how to fix > it ? Do you have traffic limit somewhere? It sounds like the switch your physical machine connected to has port storm-control or similar. I'd suggest testing using crossover cable from server <-> laptop and use iperf (or other packet generators) to isolate the problem. -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 04:57:56 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:57:56 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbvql-0000Nj-Vy; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:57:56 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbvpu-0008RF-8Y for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:57:02 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265029032-078000500000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 67EA423F99D for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 04:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com (mail-qy0-f171.google.com [209.85.221.171]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id ljL6EUV4j7XBAAYs for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:57:12 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so54747qyk.0 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:57:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.101.166 with SMTP id c38mr1576151qco.88.1265029031683; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:57:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <27362803.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <27362803.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 19:57:11 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002010457n582ea126m71311f2c63e4311e@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] How do I configure Virtual machines to DHCP from network instead of Dom0 ?? Subject: Re: [Xen-users] How do I configure Virtual machines to DHCP from network instead of Dom0 ?? From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Tom80112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-qy0-f171.google.com[209.85.221.171] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265029032 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21360 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Tom80112 wrote: > Dom0 grabbed an IP address from our network using DHCP. =A0Great! > > But the 4 virtual Guest machines did not grab a DHCP address from our > network. > I think these 4 virtual Guest machines grabbed their DHCP addresses from > Dom0. > The 4 virtual Guest machines DHCP'd addresses as: =A0192.168.122.xxx > > How do I get these 4 virtual Guest machines to DHCP from the network like > Dom0 did?? assuming your dom0 is connected using eth0, you simply need to set domU to use "eth0" or "xenbr0" bridge instead of "virbr0" bridge that you're using now. However, if your dom0 is connected using wireless, then bridging domUs there won't work. In this case you're stuck with your current setup. --=20 Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 05:40:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:40:38 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbwW6-0002Oo-5z; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:40:38 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbwVE-00023S-IY for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:39:44 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265031593-2fe1000b0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 61B3723FB2A for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 05:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f215.google.com (mail-fx0-f215.google.com [209.85.220.215]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id igg5ZyBB8T46TRjj for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:39:53 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: email.ahmedkamal@googlemail.com Received: by fxm7 with SMTP id 7so4962822fxm.28 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:39:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4fos2hTguOxoKeMUnHJ7iEWoxD9DEiP06HlW0u5nb1A=; b=PE2oyvBHKSRzea1YO0xnbeL5XrAPhPghPVxe4elsjdgbAmQr3PQFQRcpTYA6azkYOy wgGkm+wPMbo3oIZ1/Z+YSzPqVs7qbV3iQFRqkIGJfXg/W0E1YYxDdr8AfUp5VYl7OiI6 Vy3A2XtVuEEDkQLe1OBYZQ/pT+AzSLgF85XY8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=p/foHCY8q96cfiBnJOfolOqgVMXC4+n725YGWoMNwvEBpa0p3mHyJwLur9v7fT36vB 2LnsfqKeAud18MQyMP+fkqynfMLvUGy2c7gECe521wFbgAlBSU5G7Ic9P7We2OnP3ESx v5vrS7PPmnNAHniOggy3RPzNyRPzQjx20ENT0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.4.16 with SMTP id 16mr4373967fap.107.1265031592622; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 05:39:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <752612c51002010437x3932243dl2aba713fa0430a43@mail.gmail.com> References: <752612c51002010219h5903bfd0p6ae7b08a4fb5babd@mail.gmail.com> <3da3b5b41002010400h28704953g77f816c073824c5e@mail.gmail.com> <752612c51002010437x3932243dl2aba713fa0430a43@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:39:52 +0200 Message-ID: <3da3b5b41002010539y66695173r74ab87ad1b0b41b9@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] question about xen cloud configuration Subject: Re: [Xen-users] question about xen cloud configuration From: Ahmed Kamal To: Peter den Hartog X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-fx0-f215.google.com[209.85.220.215] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265031594 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21362 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1451567059==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1451567059== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517478790b539c9047e8a1eae --001517478790b539c9047e8a1eae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 "xe vdi-resize" looks promising. The easiest way, is to ssh to the xcp node, and run xe commands from there, because of the spectacular bash completion there On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Peter den Hartog wrote: > thanks! that worked great, do you have any idea's for making the vdi (the > hardisk of the vm) bigger? ti's 8.x GB by default but i would like it to be > 30 GB. > > Regards & thanks, > Peter > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ahmed Kamal < > email.ahmedkamal@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Sure thing, power the VM off, and to change it to 768MB .. I'd use >> >> xe vm-param-set uuid= memory-static-max=768000000 >> xe vm-param-set uuid= memory-dynamic-max=768000000 >> >> Regards >> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Peter den Hartog < >> peterdenhartog@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I've created a test server with a xen-cloud platform on it, and it's >>> running great, i got a centos and 2 debian machines running, created from >>> template. >>> >>> I was wondering if there's any easy way to extend the ram of these >>> machine's and the size of the vdi, it got 256 mb ram and 8.xGB by default >>> but i would like these defaults to be higher, is this changable? >>> >>> Rergards & thanks, >>> Peter >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Xen-users mailing list >>> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >>> >> >> > > > -- > Groet // Kind regards, > Peter den Hartog > > --001517478790b539c9047e8a1eae Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"xe vdi-resize"

lo= oks promising. The easiest way, is to ssh to the xcp node, and run xe comma= nds from there, because of the spectacular bash completion there

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Peter den Hartog= <peterden= hartog@gmail.com> wrote:
thanks! =A0that worked great, do you have any idea's for making the vdi= (the hardisk of the vm) bigger? ti's 8.x GB by default but i would lik= e it to be 30 GB.

Regards & thanks,
Peter<= div>


On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Ahmed Kamal = <email.ahmedkamal@googlemail.com> wrote:
Sure thing, power the VM off, and to change it to 768MB ..= I'd use

xe vm-param-set =A0uuid=3D<put-uuid-here&= gt;=A0=A0memory-static-max=3D768000000
xe vm-param-set =A0uuid=3D= <put-uuid-here> =A0memory-dynamic-max=3D768000000

Regards

<= /div>
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Peter den Hartog <peterd= enhartog@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
=
I've created a test server with a xen-cloud platform on = it, and it's running great, i got a centos and 2 debian machines runnin= g, created from template.

I was wondering if there's any easy way to extend t= he ram of these machine's and the size of the vdi, it got 256 mb ram an= d 8.xGB by default but i would like these defaults to be higher, is this ch= angable?

Rergards & thanks,
Peter

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-user= s@lists.xensource.com
http://l= ists.xensource.com/xen-users




--
Groet // Ki= nd regards,
Peter den Hartog


--001517478790b539c9047e8a1eae-- --===============1451567059== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1451567059==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 07:51:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:51:17 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbyYX-0001C3-2S; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:51:17 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbyXo-0000rV-Sn for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:50:32 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265039442-64b8007a0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mx1.seakr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id E476923FB31 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 07:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.seakr.com (mx1.seakr.com [64.2.143.10]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id KRD6n36dXhDIhIjj (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:50:42 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Nick.Couchman@seakr.com Received: from mx-inside.seakr.com ([192.168.100.31]) by mx1.seakr.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o11FlLfb001188 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:47:21 -0700 Received: from (mx-inside.seakr.com [192.168.100.31]) by mail-scanner1.it.seakr.com with smtp id 40ec_0452_8d1035bc_0f49_11df_a9b7_00137252735f; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:50:42 -0700 Received: from collaborate.seakr.com (collaborate.seakr.com [192.168.100.28]) by mx-inside.seakr.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8764494F for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:50:41 -0700 (MST) Received: from seakr-engineering-MTA by collaborate.seakr.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:50:41 -0700 Message-Id: <4B6695CF020000990003D481@collaborate.seakr.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.1 Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:50:23 -0700 From: "Nick Couchman" To: "=?ISO-8859-15?Q?R=E9mi=20BERNIER?=" , X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-NAIMIME-Disclaimer: 1 X-NAIMIME-Modified: 1 X-Barracuda-Connect: mx1.seakr.com[64.2.143.10] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265039442 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21372 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1614488697==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1614488697== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline VHJ5IHJlbW92aW5nIHRoZSBzdCBtb2R1bGUgZnJvbSBkb20wIChybW1vZCBzdCkuICBUaGlzIHNo b3VsZCBpbnN1cmUKdGhhdCBkb20wIGlzIG5vdCB1c2luZyB0aGUgdGFwZSBkcml2ZSBhdCBhbGwu CgotTmljawoKPj4+IE9uIDIwMTAvMDIvMDEgYXQgMDE6MDQsIFLpbWkgQkVSTklFUjxSLkJFUk5J RVJAZ3JlbGllci5jb20+IHdyb3RlOgoKPiBIaSBFdmVyeWJvZHksCj4gCj4gSSBoYXZlIGEgcHJv YmxlbSB3aXRoIG15IG1hZ25ldGljIHRhcGUgZHJpdmUsIEkgY29udHJvbCB0aGUgdGFwZSB3aXRo Cgo+IEJhY2t1cEV4ZWMgb24gbXkgZ3Vlc3Qgd2luMmszLgo+IEJhY2t1cEV4ZWMgc2VlIGl0IHJp Z2h0IG15IHRhcGUgZHJpdmUgYnV0IGZvciBoaW0gdGhlIHRhcGUgaXMgaW4gCnVzZS4uLgo+IEkg dGhpbmsgaXQncyBteSBkb20wIHVzZSBpdCwgYmVjYXVzZSBpIGNhbiBwaWxvdCB0aGUgdGFwZSBk cml2ZSB3aXRoCnRoZSAKPiBjb21tYW5kICJtdCIgb24gZG9tMC4uLgo+IAo+IFNvIGZvciBtZSBp IG5lZWQgdG8gaGlkZSB0aGUgdGFwZSB0byBib290IC4uLiBidXQgdGhpcyBsaW5lIGluIGdydWIK aGF2ZSAKPiBubyBpbXBhY3QgOgo+IG1vZHVsZSAgICAgICAgIC9ib290L3ZtbGludXotMi42LjE4 LjgteGVuLWFtZDY0IHJvb3Q9L2Rldi9zZGExIHJvIAo+IGNvbnNvbGU9dHR5MCBzY3NpYmFjay5w ZXJtaXNzaXZlIHNjc2liYWNrLmhpZGU9KDY6MDo2OjApCj4gCj4gSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgYW4gaWRl YSBvbiB0aGlzIHN1YmplY3QsIEkgbGlzdGVuIHlvdSAhIQo+IAo+IFRoYW5rcyBmb3IgeW91ciBh bnN3ZXIgaW4gYWR2YW5jZS4KPiAKPiBS6W1pCj4gCj4gQ29uZjoKPiBEZWJpYW4gbGVubnksIGtl cm5lbCAyLjYuMTgtOHg4Nl82NC14ZW4sIHhlbiAzLjQuMiAoeGVuYml0cykKCgoKLS0tLS0tLS0N ClRoaXMgZS1tYWlsIG1heSBjb250YWluIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbCBhbmQgcHJpdmlsZWdlZCBtYXRl cmlhbCBmb3IgdGhlIHNvbGUgdXNlIG9mIHRoZSBpbnRlbmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQuICBJZiB0aGlz IGVtYWlsIGlzIG5vdCBpbnRlbmRlZCBmb3IgeW91LCBvciB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCByZXNwb25zaWJs ZSBmb3IgdGhlIGRlbGl2ZXJ5IG9mIHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSB0byB0aGUgaW50ZW5kZWQgcmVjaXBp ZW50LCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90ZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMgbWVzc2FnZSBtYXkgY29udGFpbiBTRUFLUiBFbmdp bmVlcmluZyAoU0VBS1IpIFByaXZpbGVnZWQvUHJvcHJpZXRhcnkgSW5mb3JtYXRpb24uICBJbiBz dWNoIGEgY2FzZSwgeW91IGFyZSBzdHJpY3RseSBwcm9oaWJpdGVkIGZyb20gZG93bmxvYWRpbmcs IHBob3RvY29weWluZywgZGlzdHJpYnV0aW5nIG9yIG90aGVyd2lzZSB1c2luZyB0aGlzIG1lc3Nh Z2UsIGl0cyBjb250ZW50cyBvciBhdHRhY2htZW50cyBpbiBhbnkgd2F5LiAgSWYgeW91IGhhdmUg cmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGluIGVycm9yLCBwbGVhc2Ugbm90aWZ5IHVzIGltbWVkaWF0 ZWx5IGJ5IHJlcGx5aW5nIHRvIHRoaXMgZS1tYWlsIGFuZCBkZWxldGUgdGhlIG1lc3NhZ2UgZnJv bSB5b3VyIG1haWxib3guICBJbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBjb250YWluZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIHRo YXQgZG9lcyBub3QgcmVsYXRlIHRvIHRoZSBidXNpbmVzcyBvZiBTRUFLUiBpcyBuZWl0aGVyIGVu ZG9yc2VkIGJ5IG5vciBhdHRyaWJ1dGFibGUgdG8gU0VBS1IuCg== --===============1614488697== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1614488697==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 08:27:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:27:20 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbz7P-0003Yg-Nv; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:27:19 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbz6h-0003E5-JG for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:26:35 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265041604-7f7300420000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from kuber.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 8942823FD0B for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:26:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 83EwhD3PlQI2mS30 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:26:45 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bounces@nabble.com Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Nbz6q-0002sE-Ln for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:26:44 -0800 Message-ID: <27406981.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:26:44 -0800 (PST) From: Tom80112 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] How do I configure Virtual machines to DHCP from network instead of Dom0 ?? Subject: Re: [Xen-users] How do I configure Virtual machines to DHCP from network instead of Dom0 ?? In-Reply-To: <7207d96f1002010457n582ea126m71311f2c63e4311e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Nabble-From: nezwek@yahoo.com References: <27362803.post@talk.nabble.com> <7207d96f1002010457n582ea126m71311f2c63e4311e@mail.gmail.com> X-Barracuda-Connect: kuber.nabble.com[216.139.236.158] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265041605 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.41 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.41 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21374 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.41 FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD 'From' yahoo.com does not match 'Received' headers X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Thanks.. That worked.. Fajar A. Nugraha-3 wrote: >=20 > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Tom80112 wrote: >> Dom0 grabbed an IP address from our network using DHCP. =C2=A0Great! >> >> But the 4 virtual Guest machines did not grab a DHCP address from our >> network. >> I think these 4 virtual Guest machines grabbed their DHCP addresses from >> Dom0. >> The 4 virtual Guest machines DHCP'd addresses as: =C2=A0192.168.122.xxx >> >> How do I get these 4 virtual Guest machines to DHCP from the network lik= e >> Dom0 did?? >=20 > assuming your dom0 is connected using eth0, you simply need to set > domU to use "eth0" or "xenbr0" bridge instead of "virbr0" bridge that > you're using now. >=20 > However, if your dom0 is connected using wireless, then bridging domUs > there won't work. In this case you're stuck with your current setup. >=20 > --=20 > Fajar >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >=20 >=20 --=20 View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-do-I-configure-Virt= ual-machines-to-DHCP-from-network-instead-of-Dom0----tp27362803p27406981.ht= ml Sent from the Xen - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 10:08:59 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:08:59 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc0hn-0001MT-99; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:08:59 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc0h4-00010j-17 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:08:14 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265047700-5e8e000b0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 124FC23FF68 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:08:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (178.139.40.200.static.netgate.com.uy [200.40.139.178]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id Z3rpb3fDxJbFQ6a6 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 20 X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jplorier@montecarlotv.com.uy Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o11I8Ckp008179 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:08:17 -0200 Received: from [192.168.2.53] ( [192.168.2.53]) by correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (Scalix SMTP Relay 11.4.1.11855) via ESMTP; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:08:11 -0200 (UYST) Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:12:39 -0200 From: Juan Pablo Lorier To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Message-ID: <1265047959.4635.9212.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <201001130929.o0D9TSCP024964@mailscanner.montecarlotv.com.uy> References: <201001130929.o0D9TSCP024964@mailscanner.montecarlotv.com.uy> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Multiple bridges in RHEL 5.3 x-scalix-Hops: 1 Organization: Monte Carlo TV SA X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 (2.28.2-1.fc12) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 192.168.2.28 X-Barracuda-Connect: 178.139.40.200.static.netgate.com.uy[200.40.139.178] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265047704 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21380 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Subject: [Xen-users] Multiple bridges in RHEL 5.3 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juan Pablo Lorier List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1195230873==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1195230873== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-n8MK6E+Lya8YP/zuhySV" --=-n8MK6E+Lya8YP/zuhySV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I'm trying to use bonding + vlan on RHEL 5.3 to create several bridges, but I can't find how to do this. I've found several scripts to create the bridges, but either they don't work with bond+vlan or I can't understand how to call or modify the scripts to create the bridges I want. If someone can bring light to my problem I'd be very pleased. Regards, Juan Pablo Lorier -- Toda la información contenida en este correo electrónico es confidencial y para conocimiento exclusivo de su destinatario. Agradeceremos que Ud. nos comunique inmediatamente si ha recibido este correo por error. En tal caso, evite hacer uso del mismo en forma alguna y elimínelo inmediatamente de su sistema. --=-n8MK6E+Lya8YP/zuhySV Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline 
Hi,

I'm trying to use bonding + vlan on RHEL 5.3 to create several bridges, but I can't find how to do this. I've found several scripts to create
the bridges, but either they don't work with bond+vlan or I can't understand how to call or modify the scripts to create the bridges I want.
If someone can bring light to my problem I'd be very pleased.
Regards,

Juan Pablo Lorier



-- Toda la información contenida en este correo electrónico es confidencial y para conocimiento exclusivo de su destinatario. Agradeceremos que Ud. nos comunique inmediatamente si ha recibido este correo por error. En tal caso, evite hacer uso del mismo en forma alguna y elimínelo inmediatamente de su sistema. --=-n8MK6E+Lya8YP/zuhySV-- --===============1195230873== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1195230873==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 12:07:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:07:13 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc2YC-0007v6-Su; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:07:12 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc2XS-0007aS-MA for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:06:26 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265054795-1a50002d0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 757D823F5CF for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:06:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [81.174.135.208]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id OTp6L6sVO5zm5qmV for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 12:06:35 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: linux@thehobsons.co.uk Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C6023C0F4 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:06:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9jXCY49S4c-j for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:06:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simon.thehobsons.co.uk (simons-macbookpro.thehobsons.co.uk [192.168.0.202]) by patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEAB23C0F3 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:06:33 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <7207d96f1002010442m5a8549e2w8ec657b395da6511@mail.gmail.com> References: <7207d96f1002010442m5a8549e2w8ec657b395da6511@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:06:28 +0000 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com From: Simon Hobson X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Heavy Dom0 traffic stops network Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Heavy Dom0 traffic stops network Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Barracuda-Connect: patsy.thehobsons.co.uk[81.174.135.208] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265054796 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.20 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.20 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BSF_SC0_SA074b X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21388 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.20 BSF_SC0_SA074b Custom Rule SA074b X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Simon Hobson wrote: >> However, it's not just traffic from Dom0 to DomU that does it. I've got a >> big transfer going from another machine copying large amounts of data to the >> same DomU - and ping is showing occasional dropped packets. >> >> >> So, anyone got hints on what;s causing it, and more importantly, how to fix >> it ? > >Do you have traffic limit somewhere? It sounds like the switch your >physical machine connected to has port storm-control or similar. I'd >suggest testing using crossover cable from server <-> laptop and use >iperf (or other packet generators) to isolate the problem. It's definitely not that - when not transferring data between Dom0 and DomU on the same machine, I can shovel data around between DomUs and external partners with no problem. The problem ONLY happens when Dom0 is exchanging data with a DomU it hosts. It's completely repeatable - start large transfer and wait, when the traffic stops I can hit ctrl-C and the network comes back to life. So passing network traffic about is fine as long as Dom0 isn't involved at anything (other than a low rate) with one of it's own DomUs - I had to limit my rsync transfer to 25kbyte/s and even then it could cause a problem if there was other traffic going on. Given bits I've picked up before, I'm guessing that there's a problem in the network handling process - one thread handling all traffic ? Wild stab in the dark, but it does sound a bit like some sort of mutual blocking going on - and stopping one partner then frees the other one up. Is this something I should report as a bug ? What's the right way to do that ? Unfortunately, I don't have another non-production machine available at the moment so it's a bit difficult trying the later version from Debian Squeeze. I'll have a rummage around tomorrow, but I don't think anything has enough RAM. -- Simon Hobson WANTED: "Software CD ROM Kit" for Canon CLBP 360-PS printer (Canon part no RH6-3612, or possibly RH6-3810, or RH6-3610 might do). I've a dead HD and need this CD so I can replace the disk and re-install the printer OS on it. If anyone knows where I might get hold of one I'd be grateful - requests to Canon drew a blank, it's been out of support for years. Alternatively, if anyone has one of these and would let me image their hard disk ... Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 13:01:44 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:01:44 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc3Oy-0001cU-DQ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:01:44 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc3O3-0001GU-QR for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:00:48 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265058057-456e000c0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id EDCE323F636 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id OtAFZWdwDwIn3Wlp for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:00:57 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jingyun.ho@gmail.com Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so955329bwz.28 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:00:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lL3kYLt7S8/jAwtYxzmB9wllQnaCksp9uvkLzVYjLdg=; b=MvgqmKYlE3MLMTwj/wE+3MvH/TsA+zELqPr5asy0ujgZSq/+3efWevgDO6rwRQvJJh LfqCGep+FskcNu0kdkEDTD/GzihN0ECEqaSyNPTlxT4eLb5DcT2ppmIANMEwnDt6XRqz 1I1fFV+8EAWHT2VhVqaYDpNZiuRwGFmTNbYrE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=f+rHNUZvfHR5Hvs3Rz3jCAypqZH41pjI1hVgEF2BvcatQTjwSpnIJHIKFNBgCdl0iO ce+imqbG8oaF81zm25zIwAwu6grZ6QZPGj7dEPW3dZOZmMKUsWZM+v27MdT+zLRAMhmA +oeIIIUjIKLCDAyEdzHxeh6WbpxFbZrRTsjyY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.139.23 with SMTP id c23mr3889870bku.112.1265058055911; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:00:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2f88f10c1001312155h170955a3nd17eee292e8a3a0e@mail.gmail.com> References: <2f88f10c1001312155h170955a3nd17eee292e8a3a0e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:00:55 +0100 Message-ID: <2f88f10c1002011300i187d3930t2798af23b1846797@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts From: Jingyun He To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-bw0-f219.google.com[209.85.218.219] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265058057 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21392 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Feb 2 04:47:03 server1 kernel: eth0: topology change detected, propagating Feb 2 04:47:03 server1 kernel: eth0: port 32(test2) entering forwarding state I found that the bridge will send all incoming traffic to all interfaces after port 32 entering forwarding state, And it lasts almost 20 seconds, How can I avoid this? Any help appreciated. Thank you. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Jingyun He wrote: > Hello, > I noticed that when one vps starts, it will cause the bridge send all > incoming traffic to every vps for a few seconds, is this normal > behavior? > > Thank you > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 13:13:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:13:27 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc3aJ-0002W2-4a; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:13:27 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc3ZV-0002BV-MM for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:12:37 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265058767-4b1300150000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 9772C23F5E4 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:12:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.121]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id Ugf99DA5NsPSqiH3 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:12:47 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jep@obrien-pifer.com X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=cmn5gH3EavcA:10 a=kDw7Y4A9v0WXKr7WG30A:9 a=VzJp21Hy776AV6jbqY5Zxccaja4A:4 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 96.10.171.230 Received: from [96.10.171.230] ([96.10.171.230:24480] helo=mailserver.obrien-pifer.com) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 35/BF-09832-EC3476B4; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:12:46 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.22] ([192.168.1.22]) by mailserver.obrien-pifer.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o11LCksN009940; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:12:46 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Memory problems persist... Cannot allocate memory Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Memory problems persist... Cannot allocate memory From: James Pifer To: Xen List In-Reply-To: <20100127202235.GT2861@reaktio.net> References: <32936604.7.1264415147258.JavaMail.root@kmail.jpp.fr> <1264617382.15432.5.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> <20100127202235.GT2861@reaktio.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:13:23 -0500 Message-Id: <1265062404.26831.7.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com[75.180.132.121] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265058767 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21394 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > Let us know how it goes.. So far this has not gotten very far. I've had a ticket open for a week and have repeatedly asked for status updates. I'm told it's been escalated. So far the only thing I've been asked, outside of sending them the supportconfig they requested, was if this problem also happens if I assign 4gb of ram to dom0. First, the issue does still happen. Second, I shouldn't have to give dom0 that much ram. We'll see.... James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 16:38:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:38:02 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc6mI-0001YD-77; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:38:02 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc6lU-0001DV-0c for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:37:12 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265071040-456500120000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id D7B7E2403A8 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 16:37:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id cnc3HBnzhJLf6FCA for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:37:21 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: simon@gottschlag.se Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so1089071bwz.28 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:37:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.34.3 with SMTP id j3mr3978076bkd.23.1265071039879; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:37:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2f88f10c1002011300i187d3930t2798af23b1846797@mail.gmail.com> References: <2f88f10c1001312155h170955a3nd17eee292e8a3a0e@mail.gmail.com> <2f88f10c1002011300i187d3930t2798af23b1846797@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:37:19 +0100 Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts From: Simon Gottschlag To: Jingyun He X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-bw0-f219.google.com[209.85.218.219] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265071041 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21406 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0420853887==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============0420853887== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a4e6f29cf9047e934d79 --00032555a4e6f29cf9047e934d79 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm no expert, but I belive the bridge works as a hub. Maybe you should try Open vSwitch? http://openvswitch.org/ Greetings, Simon On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jingyun He wrote: > Feb 2 04:47:03 server1 kernel: eth0: topology change detected, propagating > Feb 2 04:47:03 server1 kernel: eth0: port 32(test2) entering forwarding > state > > I found that the bridge will send all incoming traffic to all > interfaces after port 32 entering forwarding state, > And it lasts almost 20 seconds, > > How can I avoid this? Any help appreciated. > > Thank you. > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Jingyun He wrote: > > Hello, > > I noticed that when one vps starts, it will cause the bridge send all > > incoming traffic to every vps for a few seconds, is this normal > > behavior? > > > > Thank you > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > --00032555a4e6f29cf9047e934d79 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm no expert, but I belive the bridge works as a hub.
Maybe you sho= uld try Open vSwitch?
http://openvsw= itch.org/

Greetings,
Simon

= On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jingyun He <jingyun.ho@gmail.com> wrote:=
Feb =A02 04:47:03= server1 kernel: eth0: topology change detected, propagating
Feb =A02 04:47:03 server1 kernel: eth0: port 32(test2) entering forwarding = state

I found that the bridge will send all incoming traffic to all
interfaces after port 32 entering forwarding state,
And it lasts almost 20 seconds,

How can I avoid this? Any help appreciated.

Thank you.


On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Jingyun He <jingyun.ho@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I noticed that when one vps starts, it will cause the bridge send all<= br> > incoming traffic to every vps for a few seconds, is this normal
> behavior?
>
> Thank you
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.= com
http://l= ists.xensource.com/xen-users
--00032555a4e6f29cf9047e934d79-- --===============0420853887== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0420853887==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 17:24:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:24:07 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc7Ut-0003LB-Aw; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:24:07 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc7UA-00030b-Rr for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:23:22 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265073812-576700390000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 0568624042C for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:23:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id oejzFRerEVfed8km for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:23:32 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jep@obrien-pifer.com X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=MDFLxrN9Qy_wPADQDQMA:9 a=km_hutbB810CN4wghDzNu3kWbEEA:4 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 96.10.171.230 Received: from [96.10.171.230] ([96.10.171.230:25793] helo=mailserver.obrien-pifer.com) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id ED/26-05033-49E776B4; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:23:32 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.22] ([192.168.1.22]) by mailserver.obrien-pifer.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o121NV2G012059 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:23:31 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Bridging in xen 3.4.2/SLES11 From: James Pifer To: Xen List Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:24:09 -0500 Message-Id: <1265077449.26831.14.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com[75.180.132.120] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265073813 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21410 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] Bridging in xen 3.4.2/SLES11 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com I have a question on bridging. I have several xen 3.4.2 servers on SLES11. The networking has changed from what I was running on xen 3.2.x on SLES10SP2. On 3.4.2 it now has a bridge, in my case br0, and then you assign the NICs to the bridge. If you have two NICs in a server, is it safe to assign both NICs to the bridge and attach both NICs to the same network? I did this today, thinking I had done it on my other servers, and it took down our whole network pretty hard. What is the proper way to handle dual NICs with bridges? Any feedback is appreciated. Thanks, James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 17:28:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:28:16 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc7Yu-00045U-1y; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:28:16 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc7YA-0003kl-8b for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:27:30 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265074060-576700430000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from sg1.atlasnetworks.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 593C4240439 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from sg1.atlasnetworks.us (sg1.atlasnetworks.us [216.243.11.12]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id n4GiLmvHlygSIqPW (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:27:40 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: nathan@atlasnetworks.us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=atlasnetworks.us; s=key2; l=704; t=1265074060; x=1265678860; q=dns/txt; h=DomainKey-Signature: Received:Received:From:To:Date:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language: Content-Language:acceptlanguage:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=XuRbZAkQETqcBaOVlA4xo KmApdA=; b=VAAXyN5P7gJPJGDuFXcl9STt27J38Xf648paOfL/vg+62LV1tzhli IMjwkmFiArllmJdfOPwvbEod95MtGwT2uTeXU1pzvI9s3sICesVXjyF2n0XNbEEi gbWoPJFlTvMrCUl24N8ciNfUqPjwtoPQpMUCxMYWWtd6U7T34p4XXA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=key2; d=atlasnetworks.us; c=nofws; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=KsvDBQYQyyZO5dUyUhq+MbBhiedZOyvRKr1BzIsQLsLnBYsc0r+H0QwE9EhL E/H/hjO/exqGCnYqmE3bChjPR+wV8el/5ua88y0DAICByVspoO0YiQ8W8 0o67SQQ/Jnvago6qxWfUik97VqN6JY9AiTky9bYNOPAda6GFj2Rx9Y=; Received: from ex01.corp.atlasnetworks.us by atlasnetworks.us (sg1.atlasnetworks.us) (SecurityGateway 2.0.2) with SMTP id SG001133007.MSG for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:27:40 -0800 Received: from ex01.corp.atlasnetworks.us ([216.243.9.250]) by ex01 ([216.243.9.250]) with mapi; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:27:38 -0800 From: Nathan Eisenberg To: "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:27:36 -0800 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts Thread-Topic: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts Thread-Index: Acqjn+rUM3azlN4uTzOwUIasjaN9PgABj1Gg Message-ID: <11B064048F34FD4094CBA16FC04BE2198C14864A@ex01> References: <2f88f10c1001312155h170955a3nd17eee292e8a3a0e@mail.gmail.com> <2f88f10c1002011300i187d3930t2798af23b1846797@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SGPtrLookup-Result: pass dns.ptr=exchange.atlasnetworks.us (ip=216.243.9.250) X-SGHeloLookup-Result: pass smtp.helo=ex01.corp.atlasnetworks.us (ip=216.243.9.250) X-SGOP-RefID: str=0001.0A010208.4B677F8B.0039:SCFSTAT10654623, ss=1, fgs=0 (_st=1 _vt=0 _iwf=0) X-Barracuda-Connect: sg1.atlasnetworks.us[216.243.11.12] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265074060 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21410 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com >I'm no expert, but I belive the bridge works as a hub. >Maybe you should try Open vSwitch? >http://openvswitch.org/ That would be counter to what a bridge is - which is to say, a switch (whic= h floods on ARP-fail). Every time you start a VPS, the bridge's MAC address table is probably gett= ing flushed. It doesn't 'converge' for a period of time (once it's learned= where MAC addresses 'are') - which is probably significant at 32 VPS's. That said, openvswitch is a cool project. Just wanted to be clear - the br= idge isn't a hub, it's just a switch that falls back to flooding traffic ou= t all interfaces when its mac-address-table is empty. Best Regards, Nathan Eisenberg _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 17:29:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:29:40 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc7aF-0004mq-Tm; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:29:39 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc7YQ-0003sE-5i for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:27:46 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265074075-2dae00c90000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with SMTP id 56378240445 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:27:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.182.122]) by spam.xensource.com with SMTP id uggEL6o46mxZUlL5 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:27:55 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: murrayie@yahoo.co.uk Received: (qmail 29954 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2010 01:27:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1265074074; bh=DLYJoM2QYyl4f6K3IQHGRclnBwV5PArzFk6ee9MAO9w=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qdWWZ75xV9Fopk0c4p78YdwLG3SBl5yA+PXhuysmIlmMfn1AWStp+rR1rBXED+GepQVgxjZYgfRHbsXH/jXTE3QlRju+19cAKc/sJAsEL9MCF8EYD8MnLIQtOnZkmy7GtonZ8nWp5VK2JrfZJRJ8Qo5WXeaZsRV4VnTujbHtmLk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HahsetS1knJ/4bt0jqkqmLfUh+n57NLDCxDS+QVxIBnzco1xVez1sxZmop6+TJ5l90iKdgZVwn/fmW1yqjr0e3J6C4dcY21qEae3DUCVgADN55P8kxr52hopZ8+vNvh13hvG00oKp4b5XU33e0os3moCgYUSmTYdW5mSynvoJwM=; Message-ID: <963553.29934.qm@web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: TPIVk24VM1kzz5HGPGUg9cadp67KzxHzLHoZfBZ5mG74Fnuh_uIuuQTX8Y_4IEcduxvxNIGvXr2iSbVGodmnXrwmGfXrZFl3uYxRoqiiFFw8lc00o0LxYuSHNMvJjDuzVXxDEOCAY_knpEzrb3iPKL7iznir5GKGvcEhCOsKGzD3c4zLuinUnHgJOFjDjKrICtfeebZzjL0pZR7u1i1nqShv5AgUGSM- Received: from [93.97.25.19] by web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:27:54 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:27:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Ian Murray X-ASG-Orig-Subj: PCI-Passthrough To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com[217.146.182.122] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265074076 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21410 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] PCI-Passthrough X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi,=0A=0AI am trying to get a PCI network card working through PCI pass-thr= ough.=0A=0AWhen I start the relevant domain, I get the following message. U= sing 3.4.2 from GitCo repository on Centos 5.4. Dom0 and DomU's kernels rep= ort they are 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5xen. This is the std Xen kernel from CentOS= .=0A=0AWhen I try to start the related DomU domain, I get this.=0A=0AError:= pci: 0000:01:06.0: non-page-aligned MMIO BAR found.=0A=0AA bit of googling= says I should put something in my kernel of Dom0's boot line, e.g. =0A=0Am= odule /vmlinuz-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5xen ro root=3D/dev/VG1/LV0 pci=3Dnomsi cp= ufreq=3Dxen pciback.permissive pciback.hide=3D(01:06.0) reassign_resources = reassigndev=3D00:01:06.0=0A=0A=0ABut this hasn't help. Any suggestions woul= d be welcome.=0A=0AThanks,=0A=0AIan.=0A=0A=0A _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 17:51:52 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:51:52 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc7vk-0005zW-Fa; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:51:52 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc7uy-0005dj-Ri for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:51:04 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265075473-2dae00f10000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail.gmx.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with SMTP id D28F72402D9 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 17:51:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by spam.xensource.com with SMTP id erbnB5OhgNVKJGoy for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:51:14 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Stefan.Kuhne@gmx.net Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Feb 2010 01:51:12 -0000 Received: from koln-d932c4b7.pool.mediaWays.net (EHLO Earth.access.denied) [217.50.196.183] by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 02 Feb 2010 02:51:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #6997022 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+89e1/L/y89VjI+Ivzxc626WE83vYtC/6gxKYiMT UFh5cxtDcoowcz Received: from travelmate.access.denied ([192.168.200.211]) by Earth.access.denied with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nc7v5-0001Fw-Hc; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:51:11 +0100 Message-ID: <4B67850C.8000601@access.denied> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:51:08 +0100 From: Stefan Kuhne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] PCI-Passthrough Subject: Re: [Xen-users] PCI-Passthrough References: <963553.29934.qm@web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <963553.29934.qm@web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 X-Scan-Signature: 6358da00c7ebd3674ada5f8bc3bed298 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71999999999999997 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail.gmx.net[213.165.64.20] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265075474 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21412 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1714081936==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============1714081936== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0EA6D6D0F53889BD5AC3FC63" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0EA6D6D0F53889BD5AC3FC63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 02.02.2010 02:27, schrieb Ian Murray: > Error: pci: 0000:01:06.0: non-page-aligned MMIO BAR found. >=20 > A bit of googling says I should put something in my kernel of Dom0's bo= ot line, e.g.=20 >=20 There for exists a patch. I don't if your KErnel have it. Stefan Kuhne --------------enig0EA6D6D0F53889BD5AC3FC63 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLZ4UQAAoJEFLNPgL3IBVXut0H/29mylJ81c4O5uwk0GEJEqAJ xWFk7XgCCcKCKF0Ie/HKyQJoqD7pxRnvvkEQH4LU9Ag44dAslXtgSkAxsh+TGONZ LyrVbEduyywS9s1QkrX3xzpUVwFTWdEUEmEdHNO/Wzhq9YzlVn+gugnW6IDsjHml 013bmpVz4VlzIo4WsGJ0tQpBbrBVuPk55vyZJxy+0yjHhXXSRNK/ekCceplhFe0W S0DOeRO6f8beiVBCbQrlaUmRvsT25hRCT6zXHlt72jY7Cxfc5t4w87gez6PgQ1g+ ccYgLSEKtCz7Li6RTB50YFgQUKmmYLD5Hq6MTcOCX4Cfc0D+8o7Cxom/cMJeDhA= =TKpF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0EA6D6D0F53889BD5AC3FC63-- --===============1714081936== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1714081936==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 18:16:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:16:41 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc8Jl-0007Vx-FT; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:16:41 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc8J0-0007BT-VF for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:15:54 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265076964-7eab001f0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id E84612402C6 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:16:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.149]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id YgKXzwuDQgmodNjr for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:16:04 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so819348qwf.42 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:16:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.88.72 with SMTP id z8mr1455936qcl.39.1265076964210; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:16:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1265047959.4635.9212.camel@localhost> References: <201001130929.o0D9TSCP024964@mailscanner.montecarlotv.com.uy> <1265047959.4635.9212.camel@localhost> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:16:04 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002011816t6288af05o14b7b94ecafa414@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Multiple bridges in RHEL 5.3 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Multiple bridges in RHEL 5.3 From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Juan Pablo Lorier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: qw-out-1920.google.com[74.125.92.149] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265076964 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21414 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Juan Pablo Lorier wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use bonding + vlan on RHEL 5.3 to create several bridges, but > I can't find how to do this. I've found several scripts to create > the bridges, but either they don't work with bond+vlan or I can't understand > how to call or modify the scripts to create the bridges I want. > If someone can bring light to my problem I'd be very pleased. > Regards, The easy way: don't use Xen's default bridge network script (comment-out network-script entry on /etc/xen/xend-config.sxp), and create bridges+bond+vlans manually using OS config files (/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-*). Are you familiar with editing those files? -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 18:23:12 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:23:12 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc8Q4-0008I3-4G; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:23:12 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc8PM-0007xG-WE for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:22:29 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265077358-05d300120000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id C986F2402A9 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:22:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.150]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id tFGTKciIJpD7SKQM for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:22:38 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 5so820120qwf.42 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:22:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.119.7 with SMTP id x7mr2135124qcq.22.1265077358106; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:22:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7207d96f1002010442m5a8549e2w8ec657b395da6511@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:22:38 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002011822p61f22815u2b7f3a3ba5c114d0@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Heavy Dom0 traffic stops network Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Heavy Dom0 traffic stops network From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Simon Hobson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: qw-out-1920.google.com[74.125.92.150] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265077358 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21414 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Simon Hobson wrote: > Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> Do you have traffic limit somewhere? It sounds like the switch your >> physical machine connected to has port storm-control or similar. > It's definitely not that - when not transferring data between Dom0 and DomU > on the same machine, I can shovel data around between DomUs and external > partners with no problem. > > The problem ONLY happens when Dom0 is exchanging data with a DomU it hosts. > It's completely repeatable - start large transfer and wait, when the traffic > stops I can hit ctrl-C and the network comes back to life. Then it looks like a serious bug. > Is this something I should report as a bug ? What's the right way to do that > ? Unfortunately, I don't have another non-production machine available at > the moment so it's a bit difficult trying the later version from Debian > Squeeze. I'll have a rummage around tomorrow, but I don't think anything has > enough RAM. The thing is you're using a (very) old version of kernel-xen, and the problem is probably fixed in current versions. I'm using RHEL5 with its builtin kernel-xen and don't have the problem you mentioned. I'd suggest you start with testing latest 2.6.18 kernel from xen.org, or (if you're a bit lazy) grab a copy of RHEL5's kernel-xen rpm, extract it somewhere, and copy the contents of /boot and /lib to your system. -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 18:33:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:33:22 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc8Zt-0001Bv-TF; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:33:21 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nc8ZD-0000p4-N8 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:32:39 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265077969-12de000e0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id CEF18240320 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 18:32:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.221.175]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 3v9c4tpgUi21i3rI for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:32:49 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qyk5 with SMTP id 5so3044453qyk.8 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:32:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.214.69 with SMTP id gz5mr535377qcb.106.1265077969168; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:32:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1265077449.26831.14.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> References: <1265077449.26831.14.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:32:49 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002011832yeca42c5u26c0c0c909f57d2@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Bridging in xen 3.4.2/SLES11 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Bridging in xen 3.4.2/SLES11 From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: James Pifer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-qy0-f175.google.com[209.85.221.175] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265077969 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21414 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: Xen List X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, James Pifer wrote: > I have a question on bridging. I have several xen 3.4.2 servers on > SLES11. The networking has changed from what I was running on xen 3.2.x > on SLES10SP2. On 3.4.2 it now has a bridge, in my case br0, and then you > assign the NICs to the bridge. > > If you have two NICs in a server, is it safe to assign both NICs to the > bridge and attach both NICs to the same network? Of course not. Not without proper setup. Depending on your setup, it can either took down the entire network, or got some switch port disabled. > > I did this today, thinking I had done it on my other servers, and it > took down our whole network pretty hard. What is the proper way to > handle dual NICs with bridges? If they're on the same vlan/physical network, you'd need to setup bonding. And then you probably need to setup your own bridge, as I doubt the default xen networking script would be able to handle that. -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 21:00:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:00:16 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcAs4-00049n-HX; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:00:16 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcArJ-0003p7-9L for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:59:29 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265086778-463d00870000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from exchange.noc.office.singlehop.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 81E7224032A for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:59:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from exchange.noc.office.singlehop.net (exchange.noc.office.singlehop.net [67.212.167.6]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id DF3hsQ2zw30nOdOu (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 201 X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: APace@singlehop.com Received: from exchange.noc.office.singlehop.net ([67.212.167.6]) by exchange.noc.office.singlehop.net ([67.212.167.6]) with mapi; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:57:21 -0600 From: Andy Pace To: "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:57:19 -0600 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: iSCSI vs NFS Thread-Topic: iSCSI vs NFS Thread-Index: AQHKo8QzLzwJUKgiHEaYRkXbWf3xkg== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: exchange.noc.office.singlehop.net[67.212.167.6] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265086779 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: RC4-MD5 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21424 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Which is the easiest to manage with multiple (lets say hundreds) of xen VM'= s without sacrificing performance, and why? What are the pro's and cons to each? From my research, iSCSI seems the way = to go here, but all the SAN/NAS vendor's I've spoken with live and die *NFS= *, which I've had some serious issues with in the past in so far as scalabi= lity and performance... Just thought i'd get an outside/un-biased (i hope!) opinion...= _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 21:11:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:11:27 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcB2s-00050R-PV; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:11:26 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcB2D-0004g2-GI for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:10:45 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265087455-463d00a70000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-qy0-f199.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 74CB824044A for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f199.google.com (mail-qy0-f199.google.com [209.85.221.199]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id JaFaoe1nhc6NAEdI for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:10:55 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fajar@fajar.net Received: by qyk37 with SMTP id 37so2454455qyk.18 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:10:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.131.22 with SMTP id v22mr2110355qcs.77.1265087454700; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:10:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:10:54 +0700 Message-ID: <7207d96f1002012110l26b1f338w3cadccdcb8f95c5c@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" To: Andy Pace Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-qy0-f199.google.com[209.85.221.199] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265087455 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21426 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Andy Pace wrote: > Which is the easiest to manage with multiple (lets say hundreds) of xen VM's without sacrificing performance, and why? The topic has been covered several times already. Try searching list archive. Something like this: http://markmail.org/message/4f4oblgqsgqqzu5d -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Mon Feb 01 21:27:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:27:15 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcBIB-0005zx-Dg; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:27:15 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcBHV-0005fO-Ia for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:26:33 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265088403-7c3900040000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id A9CAC240472 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id J7dNVy9FKJdcYU9N for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:26:43 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: rcha108@aucklanduni.ac.nz Received: by iwn11 with SMTP id 11so5005563iwn.16 for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:26:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.170.136 with SMTP id d8mr457705ibz.17.1265088402918; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:26:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:26:42 +1300 Message-ID: <94e5c5c21002012126r4e8d5de7g336d25efcad2c28e@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: OpenSolaris as Dom0 From: rcha108 rcha108 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-iw0-f181.google.com[209.85.223.181] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265088403 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21426 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] OpenSolaris as Dom0 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi guys, Does any have any comments/experiences on using OpenSolaris as Dom0 for a Xen host? I'm most attracted to it in order to use ZFS which would allow the easy thin provisioning of storage (from what I have read) which isn't possible with LVM/ext3. Any experiences with ZFS/thin provisioning for guests? Though, I am a little bit concerned about the performance and how it would match up with a Linux host, and guest compatability. Comments? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 00:10:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:10:04 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcDpj-0003Sj-TS; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:10:03 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcDp0-000387-N9 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:09:18 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265098168-371e009f0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with SMTP id F41262406EC for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 00:09:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.182.125]) by spam.xensource.com with SMTP id edUhXjKb8LUSlms2 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:09:28 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: murrayie@yahoo.co.uk Received: (qmail 83449 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2010 08:09:27 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1265098167; bh=0OnTFxezZ0GFYWNvhYFa6ZJsBBeq+/SS6XA/ANl6onQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IjhVaK1eJStD8PEKfcsp9AAZwp8yO7jFDjO9aH3bX7ngbr9uAOwTlaSss6RJHg5zR1Y8/TZAw0Rz2R5BxiHwgWh6S2ZFVzhVnmwwRWVod1PAUj3Kvos3px6ofgGlPHzRigK86a/jGH0JS9RsKb+tZce0S+xQrIP5HxbjaKHmBIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pNm7/PRYLLJlYW7EEef4VynZfyRj852U0PvCZ75hEc6yToxaOU/GTmZxpjknqMXiX56wMNpkCwbK0QWup9xb5dVhYzbC5gY+IagnC+3hL38zypEC14tx6yMWr/FRx2FTXkk3VB32lP4GZV0n/EHO4ysGB+ATljcA2zot/INMwYM=; Message-ID: <483448.83229.qm@web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: meI7zfgVM1l8zqndBnGOAF7w9P_wwGW0ur0.QMBdF9PxqSAiAzUA5Dyrd5KzdtnNov_SSqSEKJvLvLUUCgLEjWo.YeBvSo5SXEzf5nWpZq_hisUvDTHu4QgMByua8FBKmxQhhEsZj.qs3f4qPvXrjpdmRjlXguEsmQ4C9MHu_5yIpjkcafmIpSllZGXQCwCiU4j0EdDlccJAx_l57JiJ5UNTlBZqx5E- Received: from [93.97.25.19] by web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:09:27 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 References: <963553.29934.qm@web28102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4B67850C.8000601@access.denied> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 00:09:27 -0800 (PST) From: Ian Murray X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] PCI-Passthrough Subject: Re: [Xen-users] PCI-Passthrough To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com In-Reply-To: <4B67850C.8000601@access.denied> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: web28105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com[217.146.182.125] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265098169 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21436 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi,=0A=0AThanks for the reply.=0A=0A=0A=0A> > =0A> > A bit of googling says= I should put something in my kernel of Dom0's boot =0A> line, e.g. =0A> > = =0A> There for exists a patch.=0A> I don't if your KErnel have it.=0A=0APre= sumably, I need to run the official Xen kernel, then? Is this pre-patched? = If not, where is this patch?=0A=0AI looked through the How-to list in the w= iki and there is nothing around about this aspect of PCI-passthrough apart = from with vt-d. I don't mind putting a page together to cover what the manu= al doesn't, but I am going to need some help from the list or other sources= given that I am a passthrough noob. =0A=0AThanks,=0A=0AIan.=0A=0A=0A=0A = _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 00:33:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:33:40 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcECZ-0008W0-Vs; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:33:40 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcEBm-0008B1-L3 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:32:50 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265099578-68b5001d0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id B23D42407BC; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 00:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (reverse.grelier.com [79.174.213.138]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id vgeIBXv2UM3MgfTG; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:32:58 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: R.BERNIER@grelier.com In-Reply-To: <4B6695CF020000990003D481@collaborate.seakr.com> To: "Nick Couchman" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:32:56 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on svdomino/grelier(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 02/02/2010 09:32:59, Serialize complete at 02/02/2010 09:32:59 X-Barracuda-Connect: reverse.grelier.com[79.174.213.138] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265099579 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21438 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com, xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1191863754==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --===============1191863754== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 002EF7EFC12576BE_=" Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 002EF7EFC12576BE_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Nick and thanks for your reply, I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi tape,=20 I have this error: # xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0 Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-devname: None: argument 3 must be string = or read-only buffer, not None and I have nothing in "xm scsi-list 1" I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0: # lsscsi [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 - With st module: # lsscsi [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 /dev/st0 If you have an other idea.. Thanks in advance, I will test to hide the scsi-controller at the boot.of my dom0: pciback.hide=3D(...) R=E9mi >Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st). This should insure >that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all. >-Nick >>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER wrote: >> Hi Everybody, >=20 > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with > BackupExec on my guest win2k3. > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in=20 use... > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with the=20 > command "mt" on dom0... >=20 > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub have=20 > no impact : > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro=20 > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0) >=20 > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !! >=20 > Thanks for your answer in advance. >=20 > R=E9mi >=20 > Conf: > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits) -------- This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole=20 use of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or=20 you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended=20 recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering=20 (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are=20 strictly prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or=20 otherwise using this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If=20 you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by=20 replying to this e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox.=20 Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business = of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR. =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --=_alternative 002EF7EFC12576BE_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Nick and thanks for your reply,

I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi tape, I have this error:

# xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0
Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-de= vname: None: argument 3 must be string or read-only buffer, not None

and I have nothing in "xm scsi-= list 1"

I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0:
# lsscsi
[7:0:6:0]    tape   &= nbsp;CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2        1914  -

With st module:
# lsscsi
[7:0:6:0]    tape   &= nbsp;CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2        1914  /dev/st0

If you have an other idea..
Thanks in advance,

I will test to hide the scsi-control= ler at the boot.of my dom0:
pciback.hide=3D(...)

R=E9mi


>Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st).  This should insure
>that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all.

>-Nick

>>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER<R.BERNIER@grelie= r.com> wrote:

>> Hi Everybody,
>
> I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with<= br>
> BackupExec on my guest win2k3.
> BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in
use...
> I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with the
> command "mt" on dom0...
>
> So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub
have
> no impact :
> module         /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro
> console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0)
>
> If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !!
>
> Thanks for your answer in advance.
>
> R=E9mi
>
> Conf:
> Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits)



--------
This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient.  If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Enginee= ring (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you are strictly prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwi= se using this message, its contents or attachments in any way.  If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replyi= ng to this e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox.  Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR.
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--=_alternative 002EF7EFC12576BE_=-- --===============1191863754== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1191863754==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 01:40:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:40:45 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcFFU-0002fA-P7; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:40:44 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcFEk-0002Kl-8a for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:39:58 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265103600-091f00340000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp2.bendigoit.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 57B06240A2D for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 01:40:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp2.bendigoit.com.au (mail.bendigoit.com.au [203.16.207.99]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id kNX3K5tSzqa9CVcf (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 01:40:03 -0800 (P X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: james.harper@bendigoit.com.au Received: from trantor.int.sbss.com.au ([192.168.200.206] helo=mail.bendigoit.com.au) by smtp2.bendigoit.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcFGI-0006ST-Ec; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:41:34 +1100 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:39:30 +1100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Thread-Index: Acqj4oOWjSIxv2f7TGaIL913aVa7+wACPhgQ References: <4B6695CF020000990003D481@collaborate.seakr.com> From: "James Harper" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= , "Nick Couchman" X-Really-From-Bendigo-IT: magichashvalue X-Barracuda-Connect: mail.bendigoit.com.au[203.16.207.99] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265103605 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21441 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com I use scsi passthrough with my gplpv drivers regularly to give Windows = access to a physical tape drive. Is that what you are trying to do? James > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of R=E9mi BERNIER > Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:33 > To: Nick Couchman > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com; = xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 >=20 >=20 > Hi Nick and thanks for your reply, >=20 > I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi = tape, I > have this error: >=20 > # xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0 > Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-devname: None: argument 3 must be = string or > read-only buffer, not None >=20 > and I have nothing in "xm scsi-list 1" >=20 > I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0: > # lsscsi > [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 - >=20 > With st module: > # lsscsi > [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 /dev/st0 >=20 > If you have an other idea.. > Thanks in advance, >=20 > I will test to hide the scsi-controller at the boot.of my dom0: > pciback.hide=3D(...) >=20 > R=E9mi >=20 >=20 >=20 > >Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st). This should insure > >that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all. >=20 > >-Nick >=20 > >>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER = wrote: >=20 > >> Hi Everybody, > > > > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape = with >=20 > > BackupExec on my guest win2k3. > > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in > use... > > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with > the > > command "mt" on dom0... > > > > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub > have > > no impact : > > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro > > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0) > > > > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !! > > > > Thanks for your answer in advance. > > > > R=E9mi > > > > Conf: > > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86_64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits) >=20 >=20 >=20 > -------- > This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the = sole use > of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or = you are > not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended = recipient, > please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) > Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly > prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise = using > this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have = received > this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to = this e-mail > and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in = this > message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither = endorsed by > nor attributable to SEAKR. > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 02:03:04 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:03:04 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcFb6-0003r8-8q; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:03:04 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcFaH-0003W1-Uc for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:02:13 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265104942-7ef100760000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id BC39124079C for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 02:02:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (reverse.grelier.com [79.174.213.138]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id kAhrKlTaH5xicAHA for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:02:23 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: R.BERNIER@grelier.com In-Reply-To: To: "James Harper" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:02:19 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on svdomino/grelier(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 02/02/2010 11:02:23, Serialize complete at 02/02/2010 11:02:23 X-Barracuda-Connect: reverse.grelier.com[79.174.213.138] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265104943 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21443 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com, Nick Couchman X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0813088805==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --===============0813088805== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0037268AC12576BE_=" Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 0037268AC12576BE_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi James and thanks for your reply, Yes I use scsi passthrough, I have attach my tape with the command: # xm scsi-attach 3 6:0:6:0 6:0:6:0 But after my guest win2k3 detected a new tape device (Quantum LTO 2) and=20 here I have install the driver for Windows... Maybe it's the problem ! I try to change the driver with your driver gplpv xenscsi but Windows=20 don't want !!!! grrr R=E9mi >I use scsi passthrough with my gplpv drivers regularly to give Windows=20 access to a physical tape drive. Is that what you are trying to do? >James > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of R=E9mi BERNIER > Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:33 > To: Nick Couchman > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com; xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 >=20 >=20 > Hi Nick and thanks for your reply, >=20 > I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi=20 tape, I > have this error: >=20 > # xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0 > Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-devname: None: argument 3 must be=20 string or > read-only buffer, not None >=20 > and I have nothing in "xm scsi-list 1" >=20 > I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0: > # lsscsi > [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 - >=20 > With st module: > # lsscsi > [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 /dev/st0 >=20 > If you have an other idea.. > Thanks in advance, >=20 > I will test to hide the scsi-controller at the boot.of my dom0: > pciback.hide=3D(...) >=20 > R=E9mi >=20 >=20 >=20 > >Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st). This should insure > >that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all. >=20 > >-Nick >=20 > >>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER wrote: >=20 > >> Hi Everybody, > > > > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with >=20 > > BackupExec on my guest win2k3. > > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in > use... > > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with > the > > command "mt" on dom0... > > > > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub > have > > no impact : > > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro > > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0) > > > > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !! > > > > Thanks for your answer in advance. > > > > R=E9mi > > > > Conf: > > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits) >=20 >=20 >=20 > -------- > This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the=20 sole use > of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or=20 you are > not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended=20 recipient, > please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) > Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly > prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise=20 using > this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have=20 received > this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this=20 e-mail > and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this > message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither=20 endorsed by > nor attributable to SEAKR. > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --=_alternative 0037268AC12576BE_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi James and thanks for your reply,<= /font>

Yes I use scsi passthrough, I have a= ttach my tape with the command:
# xm scsi-attach 3 6:0:6:0 6:0:6:0

But after my guest win2k3 detected a new tape device (Quantum LTO 2) and here I have install the driver for Windows... Maybe it's the problem !
I try to change the driver with your driver gplpv xenscsi but Windows don't want !!!! grrr

R=E9mi





>I use scsi passthrough with my gplpv drivers reg= ularly to give Windows access to a physical tape drive. Is that what you are trying to do?

>James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-
> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of R=E9mi BERNIER
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:33
> To: Nick Couchman
> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com; xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.c= om
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3
>
>
> Hi Nick and thanks for your reply,
>
> I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi tape, I
> have this error:
>
> # xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0
> Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-devname: None: argument 3 must be string or
> read-only buffer, not None
>
> and I have nothing in "xm scsi-list 1"
>
> I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0:
> # lsscsi
> [7:0:6:0]    tape    CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2        1914  -
>
> With st module:
> # lsscsi
> [7:0:6:0]    tape    CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2        1914  /dev/st0
>
> If you have an other idea..
> Thanks in advance,
>
> I will test to hide the scsi-controller at the boot.of my dom0:
> pciback.hide=3D(...)
>
> R=E9mi
>
>
>
> >Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st).  This should insure
> >that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all.
>
> >-Nick
>
> >>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER<R.BERNIER@g= relier.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hi Everybody,
> >
> > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with
>
> > BackupExec on my guest win2k3.
> > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in
> use...
> > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with
> the
> > command "mt" on dom0...
> >
> > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub
> have
> > no impact :
> > module         /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd= 64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro
> > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0)
> >
> > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !!
> >
> > Thanks for your answer in advance.
> >
> > R=E9mi
> >
> > Conf:
> > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits)
>
>
>
> --------
> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> of the intended recipient.  If this email is not intended for you, or you are
> not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recip= ient,
> please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR)
> Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you are strictly
> prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using
> this message, its contents or attachments in any way.  If you have received
> this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail
> and delete the message from your mailbox.  Information contained in this
> message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endor= sed by
> nor attributable to SEAKR.
> =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--=_alternative 0037268AC12576BE_=-- --===============0813088805== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0813088805==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 02:18:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:18:25 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcFpw-0004qg-M5; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:18:24 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcFpC-0004Ti-EC for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:17:38 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265105866-7ef100910000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail.axxion.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 114102407EA for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 02:17:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.axxion.fi (mail.axxion.fi [217.112.248.3]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 9OchltREjSywMoFt (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:17:47 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: take@nerd.fi Received: from [192.168.10.107] (nblzone-227-99.nblnetworks.fi [83.145.227.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tapio@takenia.fi) by mail.axxion.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6ABC27A9C1 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:17:40 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4B67FBC8.10509@nerd.fi> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:17:44 +0200 From: Tapio Salonsaari User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090706) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: DomU won't start on 3.4.2 X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 OpenPGP: url=http://take.nerd.fi/public.key.txt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: mail.axxion.fi[217.112.248.3] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265105868 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21445 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] DomU won't start on 3.4.2 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello. I'm having a quite big problem with xen and I'm pretty much stuck with it by myself, so hopefully someone can help me out with this. Symptoms look like this: tvsrv1:~# xm create ns1 Using config file "/etc/xen/ns1". Error: Creating domain failed: name=ns1 And relevant parts from the xend.log: [2010-02-02 11:35:18 4049] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:92) XendDomainInfo.create(['vm', ['name', 'ns1'], ['memory', 512], ['vcpus', 1], ['on_xend_start', 'ignore'], ['on_xend_stop', 'ignore'], ['bootloader', '/usr/lib64/xen-3.2-1/bin/pygrub'], ['bootloader_args', '-q'], ['image', ['linux', ['videoram', 4]]], ['s3_integrity', 1], ['device', ['vbd', ['uname', 'file:/mnt/VirtualDisks/ns1.primary.img'], ['dev', 'xvda'], ['mode', 'w']]], ['device', ['vif', ['bridge', 'br0']]], ['device', ['vif', ['bridge', 'br1']]]]) [2010-02-02 11:35:18 4049] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:2304) XendDomainInfo.constructDomain [2010-02-02 11:35:18 4049] DEBUG (balloon:166) Balloon: 131072 KiB free; need 4096; done. [2010-02-02 11:35:18 4049] ERROR (XendDomainInfo:476) VM start failed Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py", line 455, in start XendTask.log_progress(0, 30, self._constructDomain) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendTask.py", line 209, in log_progress retval = func(*args, **kwds) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py", line 2352, in _constructDomain self.info['name_label']) VmError: Creating domain failed: name=ns1 [2010-02-02 11:35:18 4049] ERROR (XendDomainInfo:97) Domain construction failed Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py", line 95, in create vm.start() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py", line 455, in start XendTask.log_progress(0, 30, self._constructDomain) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendTask.py", line 209, in log_progress retval = func(*args, **kwds) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py", line 2352, in _constructDomain self.info['name_label']) VmError: Creating domain failed: name=ns1 Host is Debian Lenny with 2.6.18-xen-3.4.2, built by myself. I have another similar host (almost 1:1) which doesn't have this problem. I'm using DRBD to distribute ns1.primary.img and domU configuration is the same so it's not about the virtual machine itself either. Afaik this started when I upgraded NIC driver (thank you, Broadcom) but I can't recall any actions which could've caused this. I tried to recomplie both the kernel and the Xen (didn't do "fresh" build, just make distclean && make) but that didn't help. I tried to google this and all even near relevant I found was an Debian bugreport (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=520641) but as far as I can understand that's not the issue here. - -- Tapio Salonsaari +358-40-8473075 My public GPG key is available at http://take.nerd.fi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAktn+8gACgkQh/RMqfItS5WhggCfd77ER2EOhhclpqsbNBlHpZjG JrIAn29BiZM3eK+q1Vo2KUYC/WTbyRUw =QXbx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 03:56:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:56:40 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcHN2-0005UI-JF; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:56:40 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcHMF-00056R-Rv for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:55:51 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265111759-647d003b0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id D5B792409E6 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (178.139.40.200.static.netgate.com.uy [200.40.139.178]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id CGFEbiUKSy9jmsjV (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 02 Feb 20 X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jplorier@montecarlotv.com.uy Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o12Btpe5025145 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:55:56 -0200 Received: from [192.168.2.53] ( [192.168.2.53]) by correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (Scalix SMTP Relay 11.4.1.11855) via ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:55:47 -0200 (UYST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:00:11 -0200 From: Juan Pablo Lorier To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Message-ID: <1265112011.4635.10297.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <201002020130.o121UvhC010537@mailscanner.montecarlotv.com.uy> References: <201002020130.o121UvhC010537@mailscanner.montecarlotv.com.uy> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Bridging in xen 3.4.2/SLES11 x-scalix-Hops: 1 Organization: Monte Carlo TV SA X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 (2.28.2-1.fc12) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 192.168.2.28 X-Barracuda-Connect: 178.139.40.200.static.netgate.com.uy[200.40.139.178] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265111761 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21451 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Subject: [Xen-users] Re: Bridging in xen 3.4.2/SLES11 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juan Pablo Lorier List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1930016427==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1930016427== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-iZek8XCtoIDsZI3THrQp" --=-iZek8XCtoIDsZI3THrQp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline James, What I'm doing, and I think is the way to do it, is using bonding. Here you bond all you NICs into one and you're able to increase your bandwidth (is the sum of the bandwidth of your nics) and have fail over. You have to read some on your network switches to see how they handle bonding (also called trunking or port aggregation) so you can choose what mode to use. Then you have to make some config on xen so it uses the bond interface instead the nic to create the bridge. Hope it helps. -- Toda la información contenida en este correo electrónico es confidencial y para conocimiento exclusivo de su destinatario. Agradeceremos que Ud. nos comunique inmediatamente si ha recibido este correo por error. En tal caso, evite hacer uso del mismo en forma alguna y elimínelo inmediatamente de su sistema. --=-iZek8XCtoIDsZI3THrQp Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline 
James,

What I'm doing, and I think is the way to do it, is using bonding. Here
you bond all you NICs into one and you're able to increase your
bandwidth (is the sum of the bandwidth of your nics) and have fail over.
You have to read some on your network switches to see how they handle
bonding (also called trunking or port aggregation) so you can choose what mode to use.
Then you have to make some config on xen so it uses the bond interface instead the nic to create the bridge.
Hope it helps.



-- Toda la información contenida en este correo electrónico es confidencial y para conocimiento exclusivo de su destinatario. Agradeceremos que Ud. nos comunique inmediatamente si ha recibido este correo por error. En tal caso, evite hacer uso del mismo en forma alguna y elimínelo inmediatamente de su sistema. --=-iZek8XCtoIDsZI3THrQp-- --===============1930016427== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1930016427==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 04:00:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:00:13 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcHQT-0006MW-Ju; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:00:13 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcHPY-00060c-Tw for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:59:16 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265111964-647d00430000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 0272A24091F for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 03:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (178.139.40.200.static.netgate.com.uy [200.40.139.178]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id RJT2FtNMOM9ANoux (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 02 Feb 20 X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jplorier@montecarlotv.com.uy Received: from correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o12BxNwM025487 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:59:23 -0200 Received: from [192.168.2.53] ( [192.168.2.53]) by correo.montecarlotv.com.uy (Scalix SMTP Relay 11.4.1.11855) via ESMTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:59:22 -0200 (UYST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:03:55 -0200 From: Juan Pablo Lorier To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Message-ID: <1265112235.4635.10306.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <201002020835.o128Z4Of010712@mailscanner.montecarlotv.com.uy> References: <201002020835.o128Z4Of010712@mailscanner.montecarlotv.com.uy> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Multiple bridges in RHEL 5.3 x-scalix-Hops: 1 Organization: Monte Carlo TV SA X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.2 (2.28.2-1.fc12) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 192.168.2.28 X-Barracuda-Connect: 178.139.40.200.static.netgate.com.uy[200.40.139.178] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265111967 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21451 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Subject: [Xen-users] Re: Multiple bridges in RHEL 5.3 X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juan Pablo Lorier List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1987658521==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1987658521== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-IBEGhT7ng5T3DZMvuJ1T" --=-IBEGhT7ng5T3DZMvuJ1T Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline Thanks fajar on your help. I'm familiar with the scripts, in fact I already have made all the bond0.x configs. What I'm not familiar with is on creating the bridges. that I must read some. Regards, JPL -- Toda la información contenida en este correo electrónico es confidencial y para conocimiento exclusivo de su destinatario. Agradeceremos que Ud. nos comunique inmediatamente si ha recibido este correo por error. En tal caso, evite hacer uso del mismo en forma alguna y elimínelo inmediatamente de su sistema. --=-IBEGhT7ng5T3DZMvuJ1T Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Disposition: inline 

Thanks fajar on your help.
I'm familiar with the scripts, in fact I already have made all the bond0.x configs. What I'm not familiar with is on creating the bridges. that I must read some.
Regards,

JPL



-- Toda la información contenida en este correo electrónico es confidencial y para conocimiento exclusivo de su destinatario. Agradeceremos que Ud. nos comunique inmediatamente si ha recibido este correo por error. En tal caso, evite hacer uso del mismo en forma alguna y elimínelo inmediatamente de su sistema. --=-IBEGhT7ng5T3DZMvuJ1T-- --===============1987658521== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1987658521==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 04:08:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:08:55 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcHYs-0007al-TJ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:08:54 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcHXv-0007As-V7 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:07:56 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265112483-021000030000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 04AA6240A98; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 04:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (reverse.grelier.com [79.174.213.138]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 2us5EtBcSK4GlQgy; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:08:03 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: R.BERNIER@grelier.com In-Reply-To: To: "James Harper" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:08:01 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on svdomino/grelier(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 02/02/2010 13:08:04, Serialize complete at 02/02/2010 13:08:04 X-Barracuda-Connect: reverse.grelier.com[79.174.213.138] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265112485 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21451 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com, xen-users@lists.xensource.com, Nick Couchman X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0745466144==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --===============0745466144== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0042A8ECC12576BE_=" Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 0042A8ECC12576BE_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable James, I have restore my guest win2k3 without drivers, and after install your=20 last GPLPV I have a new driver in Controller SCSI and RAID: Xen SCSI=20 Driver and I have a new Tape device with a yellow exclamation point. I must install the tape driver for win2k3 or not ? If I don't install it, windows not detect a Tape device... Thanks in advance. R=E9mi >Hi James and thanks for your reply,=20 >Yes I use scsi passthrough, I have attach my tape with the command:=20 ># xm scsi-attach 3 6:0:6:0 6:0:6:0=20 >But after my guest win2k3 detected a new tape device (Quantum LTO 2) and=20 here I have install the driver for Windows... Maybe it's the problem !=20 >I try to change the driver with your driver gplpv xenscsi but Windows=20 don't want !!!! grrr=20 >R=E9mi=20 >I use scsi passthrough with my gplpv drivers regularly to give Windows=20 access to a physical tape drive. Is that what you are trying to do? >James > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of R=E9mi BERNIER > Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:33 > To: Nick Couchman > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com; xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 >=20 >=20 > Hi Nick and thanks for your reply, >=20 > I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi=20 tape, I > have this error: >=20 > # xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0 > Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-devname: None: argument 3 must be=20 string or > read-only buffer, not None >=20 > and I have nothing in "xm scsi-list 1" >=20 > I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0: > # lsscsi > [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 - >=20 > With st module: > # lsscsi > [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 /dev/st0 >=20 > If you have an other idea.. > Thanks in advance, >=20 > I will test to hide the scsi-controller at the boot.of my dom0: > pciback.hide=3D(...) >=20 > R=E9mi >=20 >=20 >=20 > >Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st). This should insure > >that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all. >=20 > >-Nick >=20 > >>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER wrote: >=20 > >> Hi Everybody, > > > > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with >=20 > > BackupExec on my guest win2k3. > > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in > use... > > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with > the > > command "mt" on dom0... > > > > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub > have > > no impact : > > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro > > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0) > > > > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !! > > > > Thanks for your answer in advance. > > > > R=E9mi > > > > Conf: > > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits) >=20 >=20 >=20 > -------- > This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the=20 sole use > of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or=20 you are > not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended=20 recipient, > please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) > Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly > prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise=20 using > this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have=20 received > this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this=20 e-mail > and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this > message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither=20 endorsed by > nor attributable to SEAKR. > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --=_alternative 0042A8ECC12576BE_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
James,

I have restore my guest win2k3 witho= ut drivers, and after install your last GPLPV I have a new driver in Controller SCSI and RAID: Xen SCSI Driver and I have a new Tape device with a yellow exclamation point.
I must install the tape driver for w= in2k3 or not ?
If I don't install it, windows not d= etect a Tape device...

Thanks in advance.

R=E9mi




>Hi James and thanks for your rep= ly,

>Yes I use scsi passthrough, I have attach my tape with the command:
># xm scsi-attach 3 6:0:6:0 6:0:6:0

>But after my guest win2k3 detected a new tape device (Quantum LTO 2) and here I have install the driver for Windows... Maybe it's the problem !
>I try to change the driver with your driver gplpv xenscsi but Windows don't want !!!! grrr

>R=E9mi





>I use scsi passthrough with my gplpv drivers regularly to give Windows access to a physical tape drive. Is that what you are trying to do?

>James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-
> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of R=E9mi BERNIER
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:33
> To: Nick Couchman
> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com; xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.c= om
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3
>
>
> Hi Nick and thanks for your reply,
>
> I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi tape, I
> have this error:
>
> # xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0
> Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-devname: None: argument 3 must be string or
> read-only buffer, not None
>
> and I have nothing in "xm scsi-list 1"
>
> I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0:
> # lsscsi
> [7:0:6:0]    tape    CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2        1914  -
>
> With st module:
> # lsscsi
> [7:0:6:0]    tape    CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2        1914  /dev/st0
>
> If you have an other idea..
> Thanks in advance,
>
> I will test to hide the scsi-controller at the boot.of my dom0:
> pciback.hide=3D(...)
>
> R=E9mi
>
>
>
> >Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st).  This should insure
> >that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all.
>
> >-Nick
>
> >>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER<R.BERNIER@g= relier.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hi Everybody,
> >
> > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with
>
> > BackupExec on my guest win2k3.
> > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in
> use...
> > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with
> the
> > command "mt" on dom0...
> >
> > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub
> have
> > no impact :
> > module         /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd= 64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro
> > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0)
> >
> > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !!
> >
> > Thanks for your answer in advance.
> >
> > R=E9mi
> >
> > Conf:
> > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits)
>
>
>
> --------
> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> of the intended recipient.  If this email is not intended for you, or you are
> not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recip= ient,
> please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR)
> Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you are strictly
> prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using
> this message, its contents or attachments in any way.  If you have received
> this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail
> and delete the message from your mailbox.  Information contained in this
> message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endor= sed by
> nor attributable to SEAKR.
> =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--=_alternative 0042A8ECC12576BE_=-- --===============0745466144== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0745466144==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 05:55:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:55:02 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcJDZ-0000Bb-TG; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:55:01 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcJBR-0007Zi-CT for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:52:49 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265118778-451f00050000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with SMTP id 53A06240BFF for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 05:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com (n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.237.93]) by spam.xensource.com with SMTP id GcTS9AVDyijDihdM for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:52:59 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bderzhavets@yahoo.com Received: from [68.142.230.29] by n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2010 13:52:58 -0000 Received: from [66.196.97.153] by t2.bullet.re2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2010 13:52:58 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp206.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Feb 2010 13:52:58 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 697385.93267.bm@omp206.mail.re3.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 49631 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2010 13:52:58 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1265118778; bh=HvFQdlU3heqlbOpqXOM4g4EE6sJkTOMaIMbgPsc1jwE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D8M8u1yRyJjxwnMZN0cfDwr+qgdgKE6x4i+HP912QfxR/8x28N0TMrGs4jnxjJ9jpAwbBgA93vtVEe8/A10kUM5aGM9CqdgOULRPG1UdjQ53tAvMdH46pGVOjCCEonVtWf9UxSkFxBZaltk+7hFT1umwqN4F9SYFyfVc5GmYLjI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=i+IlLNMLS1j/beenW+W8PNR5N6RIL4U2WyCQDLqc0++fMWWLdz1i+or/L5jCAIwvGhEihzVl6SMKKUIFU4KL8wosPgafTSy/fPkTBVkS5SLNKBnjoc7Xf7kYYyFdGIGZZRocAGSXv3mqtrJSsrF/aKm7i/t8ccsI1JJ+yoCQ4zY=; Message-ID: <554605.49173.qm@web56104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Pk2e2FkVM1mi6CJIPjhwAFGiwTwdOTs4cE5GoarZ5H3v8KnorYVXykL_JrUHYyNXhDs52gwdj6W1Lt9qhcbJsx70mrSBPbTdbtf9BtDysUIGbVIHvCg6rGSBD6k4tqeYpt4RuH3R8TmIuSD7Pnspwr3z_onG2JLE.A1BfYI3yu31uVEi7_4Mzcoe4Zos9U2OVO9oPDwobUcBFjOIiex.FHDab6wqSZOFT.f1xM2byjSg5r9ZFX.D7HX.zEcOrmbGmC00B5mgTo_kE79iDnWICPL31sfF90TsPzJ82Zde925abjK6l7tsPQwIVTqYEHH_1KRL8TNOUEnH15HzciGBdBofa0Rzxcp5fyB8MOi3JteaAH0jpBZj5PKlSBJSI9n6mZUyVLUF6YZFIKv6fx_QxpS.RgcaWhJCr1I6B_eOHIbyfkeBptmuN5tuGB0DbFHlB0CKa8P9kby3kiU- Received: from [83.221.195.84] by web56104.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:52:58 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/9.1.10 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 05:52:58 -0800 (PST) From: Boris Derzhavets X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] OpenSolaris as Dom0 Subject: Re: [Xen-users] OpenSolaris as Dom0 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com, rcha108 rcha108 In-Reply-To: <94e5c5c21002012126r4e8d5de7g336d25efcad2c28e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: n8.bullet.re3.yahoo.com[68.142.237.93] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265118779 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21458 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR URI: Includes a link to a likely spammer email 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0106836181==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============0106836181== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-613491166-1265118778=:49173" --0-613491166-1265118778=:49173 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Wrong list. View:- http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=53 Boris. --- On Tue, 2/2/10, rcha108 rcha108 wrote: From: rcha108 rcha108 Subject: [Xen-users] OpenSolaris as Dom0 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 12:26 AM Hi guys, Does any have any comments/experiences on using OpenSolaris as Dom0 for a Xen host? I'm most attracted to it in order to use ZFS which would allow the easy thin provisioning of storage (from what I have read) which isn't possible with LVM/ext3. Any experiences with ZFS/thin provisioning for guests? Though, I am a little bit concerned about the performance and how it would match up with a Linux host, and guest compatability. Comments? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --0-613491166-1265118778=:49173 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Wrong list.
View:-
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=53

Boris.

--- On Tue, 2/2/10, rcha108 rcha108 <rcha108@aucklanduni.ac.nz> wrote:

From: rcha108 rcha108 <rcha108@aucklanduni.ac.nz>
Subject: [Xen-users] OpenSolaris as Dom0
To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2010, 12:26 AM

Hi guys,

Does any have any comments/experiences on using OpenSolaris as Dom0
for a Xen host? I'm most attracted to it in order to use ZFS which
would allow the easy thin provisioning of storage (from what I have
read) which isn't possible with LVM/ext3. Any experiences with
ZFS/thin provisioning for guests? Though, I am a little bit concerned
about the performance and how it would match up with a Linux host, and
guest compatability.

Comments?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

--0-613491166-1265118778=:49173-- --===============0106836181== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0106836181==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 06:29:27 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:29:27 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcJkt-0006aQ-G0; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:29:27 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcJk7-0006Fv-N0 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:28:39 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265120928-3d7200650000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail.infinitecampus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 966FA240AC7 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:28:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.infinitecampus.com (mail.infinitecampus.com [207.225.137.26]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id InzgokrYIBGbjnat for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:28:49 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: joe.coleman@infinitecampus.com From: Joseph Coleman To: "'APace@singlehop.com'" Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:28:39 -0600 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Subject: RE: Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Thread-Topic: RE: Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Thread-Index: AcqkFAaMOoFpc8vkR0eGeEy4BpGK8w== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail.infinitecampus.com[207.225.137.26] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265120929 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21460 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: "'xen-users@lists.xensource.com'" X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1596913999==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1596913999== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DC57CFF048A13045B63DA5D831B526BC02E26223F7ANDYInfiniteC_" --_000_DC57CFF048A13045B63DA5D831B526BC02E26223F7ANDYInfiniteC_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy, I was in the same boat you are in trying to figure out which was better. I = originally started out with NFS being served up through a NetApp SAN and w= as running 100+ virtual machines through it across 4 servers. The problem w= as performance was terrible. It works ok if you are serving up a machine he= re or there and all they do is run. However, if you are going to script out= your builds and have a 4 or more machines being built at once that is when= you will see the performance hit. Once the creation is completed performa= nce will usually go back to normal. I did recently switch to iscsi in an ocfs2 format clustered on 2 servers fo= r testing and it is a lot better. However, there is a current bug with it t= ht Novell is writing a patch for me on and I should hopefully have it today= or tomorrow. I also have 2 other servers that have their own iscsi volumes= tied to them. All in all I am extremely happy with the consistent performa= nce I am getting for the ISCSI volumes and highly recommend them. Pros and cons: NFS: Extemely easy to manage. And if you SAN provider has de-dupe support the NF= S volumes de-dupe really good. But Performance is bad and will cause some t= hinning in the hairline. Iscsi: Consistent reliable performance can be used as a cluster aware file system = depending how you format it out. Doesn't de-dupe nearly as well as NFS does and isn't as easy to manage or r= esize on the fly like NFS so you need to keep an eye on your volumes and ma= nage them a little more closely. Hope this helps if you have further questions shoot me an email joe.coleman= @infinitecampus.com Message: 5 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:57:19 -0600 From: Andy Pace Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS To: "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii" Which is the easiest to manage with multiple (lets say hundreds) of xen VM'= s without sacrificing performance, and why? What are the pro's and cons to each? From my research, iSCSI seems the way = to go here, but all the SAN/NAS vendor's I've spoken with live and die *NFS= *, which I've had some serious issues with in the past in so far as scalabi= lity and performance... Just thought i'd get an outside/un-biased (i hope!) opinion... --_000_DC57CFF048A13045B63DA5D831B526BC02E26223F7ANDYInfiniteC_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Andy,

 

I was in the same boat you are in trying to figure = out which was better. I  originally started out with NFS being served up through a NetApp SAN and was running 100+ virtual machines through it acros= s 4 servers. The problem was performance was terrible. It works ok if you are serving up a machine here or there and all they do is run. However, if you = are going to script out your builds and have a 4 or more machines being built a= t once that is when you will see the performance hit.  Once the creation= is completed performance will usually go back to normal.

 

I did recently switch to iscsi in an ocfs2 format clustered on 2 servers for testing and it is a lot better. However, there i= s a current bug with it tht Novell is writing a patch for me on and I should hopefully have it today or tomorrow. I also have 2 other servers that have their own iscsi volumes tied to them. All in all I am extremely happy with = the consistent performance I am getting for the ISCSI volumes and highly recomm= end them.

 

Pros and cons:

 

NFS:

Extemely easy to manage. And if you SAN provider ha= s de-dupe support the NFS volumes de-dupe really good. But Performance is bad= and will cause some thinning in the hairline.

 

Iscsi:

 

Consistent reliable performance can be used as a cl= uster aware file system depending how you format it out.

 

Doesn’t de-dupe nearly as well as NFS does an= d isn’t as easy to manage or resize on the fly like NFS so you need to keep an eye = on your volumes and manage them a little more closely.

 

Hope this helps if you have further questions shoot= me an email joe.coleman@infinitecampus.com

 

 

 

Message: 5

Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 22:57:19 -0600

From: Andy Pace <APace@singlehop.com>

Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS

To: "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" <xen-users@lists.xensource.com>

Message-ID:

      <B915EE0870BDF348= 816B665DBE85F1652A65125FC1@exchange.noc.office.singlehop.net>=

     

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3D"us-ascii&= quot;

 

Which is the easiest to manage with multiple (lets = say hundreds) of xen VM's without sacrificing performance, and why?<= /p>

 

What are the pro's and cons to each? From my resear= ch, iSCSI seems the way to go here, but all the SAN/NAS vendor's I've spoken wi= th live and die *NFS*, which I've had some serious issues with in the past in = so far as scalability and performance...

 

Just thought i'd get an outside/un-biased (i hope!) opinion...

 

--_000_DC57CFF048A13045B63DA5D831B526BC02E26223F7ANDYInfiniteC_-- --===============1596913999== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1596913999==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 06:38:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:38:32 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcJtg-0000h0-Dy; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:38:32 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcJsu-0000J5-8j for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:37:44 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265121473-3d7500800000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from TX2EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 824FA240C87 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:37:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from TX2EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.14]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id PrQBvnodWViho4Xl (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:37 X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jeff.sturm@eprize.com Received: from mail62-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.253) by TX2EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.9.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.240.5; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:37:53 +0000 Received: from mail62-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail62-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604A3156080C; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:37:53 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -24 X-BigFish: VS-24(zz542N1432R9371Pzz1202hzzz2fh6bh62h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 1:0 Received: from mail62-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail62-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1265121471921427_19483; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS013.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.250]) by mail62-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85ABC20051; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxgw.eprize.com (208.82.64.110) by TX2EHSMHS013.bigfish.com (10.9.99.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.482.39; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:37:47 +0000 Received: from smtp.eprize.com (hugo.eprize.local [10.1.5.23]) by mxgw.eprize.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD182D0042; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:37:47 -0500 (EST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Subject: RE: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:36:55 -0500 Message-ID: <64D0546C5EBBD147B75DE133D798665F03F3F5F6@hugo.eprize.local> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Thread-Index: AQHKo8QzLzwJUKgiHEaYRkXbWf3xkpGy4Sog References: From: Jeff Sturm To: "Andy Pace" , X-Reverse-DNS: smtp.eprize.com X-Barracuda-Connect: tx2ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com[65.55.88.14] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265121474 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: RC4-MD5 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21460 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Andy Pace > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:57 PM > To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS >=20 > What are the pro's and cons to each? From my research, iSCSI seems the way to go > here, but all the SAN/NAS vendor's I've spoken with live and die *NFS*, which I've had > some serious issues with in the past in so far as scalability and performance... Those don't have to be mutually exclusive. From block storage you can easily carve out some filesystems that you export as NFS. And if you really do have hundreds of VM's, I doubt you're going to do this on a single SAN appliance unless I/O is *really* light. For what it's worth, my money's on AoE rather than iSCSI. Fast, simple, extremely easy to setup and manage. I prefer to run the block protocols on dom0 hosts and export the block devices to domU's (phy:). Tests show this yields better throughput. -Jeff _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-api-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 06:53:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:53:11 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcK7r-0001oM-Cb; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:53:11 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcK7l-0001n0-7c for xen-api@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:53:05 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265122393-698200170000-trChs3 X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id B0A90240D86; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com [62.200.22.115]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id alCnKCy2oEA9SJKM; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 06:53:13 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Rob.Hoes@citrix.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,390,1262563200"; d="scan'208,217";a="9232655" Received: from lonpmailmx01.citrite.net ([10.30.224.162]) by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2010 14:53:12 +0000 Received: from LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.30.224.161]) by LONPMAILMX01.citrite.net ([10.30.224.162]) with mapi; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:53:13 +0000 From: Rob Hoes To: "xen-api@lists.xensource.com" , "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:53:12 +0000 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [XCP] API documentation Thread-Topic: [XCP] API documentation Thread-Index: AcqkF3EZHCvJejD6Qvy6RzQ5j1kROw== Message-ID: <7EA643C653F17F4C80DE959E978F10ED41AC17210A@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp.ctxuk.citrix.com[62.200.22.115] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265122394 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21462 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: Subject: [Xen-API] [XCP] API documentation X-BeenThere: xen-api@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of API issues surrounding Xen List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0546163672==" Sender: xen-api-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-api-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============0546163672== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7EA643C653F17F4C80DE959E978F10ED41AC17210ALONPMAILBOX01_" --_000_7EA643C653F17F4C80DE959E978F10ED41AC17210ALONPMAILBOX01_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, We have now integrated an up-to-date version of the API documentation for X= CP with the source code docs of the xapi toolstack. See http://www.xen.org/files/XenCloud/ocamldoc and click on "XenAPI Documen= tation". Stephen, could you add a link to http://www.xen.org/support/documentation.h= tml? Cheers, Rob --_000_7EA643C653F17F4C80DE959E978F10ED41AC17210ALONPMAILBOX01_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

 

We have now integrated an up-to-dat= e version of the API documentation for XCP with the source code docs of the x= api toolstack.

See http://www.xen.org/file= s/XenCloud/ocamldoc and click on “XenAPI Documentation”.

 

Stephen, could you add a link to http://www.xen.org/s= upport/documentation.html?

 

Cheers,

Rob

--_000_7EA643C653F17F4C80DE959E978F10ED41AC17210ALONPMAILBOX01_-- --===============0546163672== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ xen-api mailing list xen-api@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api --===============0546163672==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 08:22:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:22:46 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcLWY-0006wA-0v; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:22:46 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcLVk-0006ZJ-5t for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:21:56 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265127725-2264000d0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 980E1240E1B; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:22:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id xCwQpFBkX4PsjkW8; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:22:05 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: stephen.spector@citrix.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,391,1262581200"; d="scan'208,217";a="7047311" Received: from ftlpmailmx02.citrite.net ([10.9.154.224]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2010 11:22:04 -0500 Received: from FTLPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.13.98.208]) by FTLPMAILMX02.citrite.net ([10.9.154.224]) with mapi; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:22:05 -0500 From: Stephen Spector To: Rob Hoes , "xen-api@lists.xensource.com" , "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:22:04 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [XCP] API documentation Thread-Topic: [XCP] API documentation Thread-Index: AcqkF3EZHCvJejD6Qvy6RzQ5j1kROwADGSTg Message-ID: <652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E4C@FTLPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <7EA643C653F17F4C80DE959E978F10ED41AC17210A@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> In-Reply-To: <7EA643C653F17F4C80DE959E978F10ED41AC17210A@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp.citrix.com[66.165.176.89] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265127725 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.01 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BSF_SC0_SA_TO_FROM_DOMAIN_MATCH, HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21468 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.01 BSF_SC0_SA_TO_FROM_DOMAIN_MATCH Sender Domain Matches Recipient Domain Cc: Subject: [Xen-users] RE: [XCP] API documentation X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2023855145==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============2023855145== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E4CFTLPMAILBOX01_" --_000_652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E4CFTLPMAILBOX01_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Will take care of it. Thanks. ...spector From: xen-api-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-api-bounces@lists.xen= source.com] On Behalf Of Rob Hoes Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 9:53 AM To: xen-api@lists.xensource.com; xen-users@lists.xensource.com Subject: [Xen-API] [XCP] API documentation Hi all, We have now integrated an up-to-date version of the API documentation for X= CP with the source code docs of the xapi toolstack. See http://www.xen.org/files/XenCloud/ocamldoc and click on "XenAPI Documen= tation". Stephen, could you add a link to http://www.xen.org/support/documentation.h= tml? Cheers, Rob --_000_652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E4CFTLPMAILBOX01_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Will take care of it. Th= anks.

 =

…spector

 =

From: xen-api-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-api-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Rob Hoes Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 9:53 AM
To: xen-api@lists.xensource.com; xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Subject: [Xen-API] [XCP] API documentation

 

Hi all,

 

We have now integrated an up-to-dat= e version of the API documentation for XCP with the source code docs of the x= api toolstack.

See http://www.xen.org/file= s/XenCloud/ocamldoc and click on “XenAPI Documentation”.

 

Stephen, could you add a link to http://www.xen.org/s= upport/documentation.html?

 

Cheers,

Rob

--_000_652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E4CFTLPMAILBOX01_-- --===============2023855145== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============2023855145==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 09:31:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:58 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcMbW-0004zJ-4U; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:58 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcMak-0004fQ-SD for Xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:10 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265131880-20b500900000-XNl8Az X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 18379240FB2 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.146]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id qs7Hl9qlzY5CFqBH for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:20 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: igalvarez@gmail.com Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 26so68752eyw.8 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Cyx/SyawAwoY8Xq+K+h9eDK011bP57x5ycZHuijyDkM=; b=i6r5yD/knlfDFZBF21X8VE9e7U1dx3Jh62a5ZYdaL+3AGSGKrK3nnnhYWRAD44B7qT 5Qp7WA+GsoC1rpin/O7s959MonfG9JVp5SggamKWxF0JUv+ukMOHDsev+yqa6GReOB8e EGQ7oyVsoO2WH3tM2xi76mkIr5s3iy+306gYw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=kewRBlCEky1QSKKtAH4++qMl3GgIBvWcZyyPUMUmskPdpmXtwi8DczKZlekZTxuiwY hqY0eO0uCnzaeJGJASTkxHTiZvM4JI/qpFDYo6y10ZclGTts3JdRZITEqWKnIqsha1jT mgrSWbNFKvdbedPGqRn/R/nZ26SGFzuYH+Br4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.91.15 with SMTP id g15mr1735657wef.24.1265131879129; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:31:18 -0500 Message-ID: <194a2c241002020931o7a0dcf47ude7a0e566fc3912b@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge failed From: Israel Garcia To: Xen Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Barracuda-Connect: ey-out-1920.google.com[74.125.78.146] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265131881 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21472 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: Subject: [Xen-users] Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge failed X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi, sometimes when I start a vps (xm create vps.cfg) I get this error: Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge failed But, I try several times and the domU start. I've attached vif-bridge file. See logs below: Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 kernel: [994563.501959] eth0: port 57(veth466a) entering disabled state Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: offline XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/153/1 Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 kernel: [994563.534239] eth0: port 57(veth466a) entering disabled state Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: brctl delif eth0 veth466a failed Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: ifconfig veth466a down failed Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: Successful vif-bridge offline for veth466a, bridge eth0. Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 kernel: [994563.838084] eth0: port 56(veth466) entering disabled state Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: offline XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/153/0 Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 kernel: [994563.863357] eth0: port 56(veth466) entering disabled state Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: brctl delif eth0 veth466 failed Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: ifconfig veth466 down failed Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: Successful vif-bridge offline for veth466, bridge eth0. Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/console/153/0 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/153/0 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/153/1 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/block: remove XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/153/51714 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/block: remove XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/153/51713 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/153/51713 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/153/51714 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/block: add XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/154/51714 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/block: add XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/154/51713 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: online XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/154/0 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: online XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/154/1 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 kernel: [994580.723111] device veth466 entered promiscuous mode Can you helpme to debugging the problem? thanks in advance. -- Regards; Israel Garcia _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 09:33:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:33:47 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcMdH-0005qy-FL; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:33:47 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcMat-0004hx-PG for Xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:19 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265131888-40a8003a0000-XNl8Az X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 08AE5240FB7 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:31:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f226.google.com (mail-fx0-f226.google.com [209.85.220.226]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id Nz5UfNS6egsy0LAc for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:29 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: igalvarez@gmail.com Received: by fxm26 with SMTP id 26so315910fxm.33 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=1noqqu49FHbAxhiBanidmKmDdXx3iU4VL8/WyYNIzx4=; b=AhiM/nVmCi2Q5wBzMwCUTY96zMrdOXVcZEIJXZHQE4rYy9+KkMeVKZZ8D35khd+sVc gOQ9kYB8hU4BfBR0AstN+XNvisK8QH/0eIgW/t09VNy4pCt21hagKXSlQOxoiAQgSf2m uhCocuzUSs0SIdcmzRvgJn60I1GIZHqVHMvnc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bPYnYTlVw4o/zKuri+L+NV5MADSDbdDiEd0bWHZA4m6Kei6YV5IL6ZDFHaxySXlwPH 1ABnWj0FqtUCWWC13RKOXbWoc5As2EUX5LXz3QXStwiKGO3s1lBGLtVO+RGvMGl+XhNT CNYW4Kv0Cq3EubQKyupW3pr4gPGp67wHFyisU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.212 with SMTP id a62mr94064wef.72.1265131887887; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:31:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:31:25 -0500 Message-ID: <194a2c241002020931n5a3e15c5waa899305d6a469f8@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge failed From: Israel Garcia To: Xen Users Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=0016e6d64559c589e7047ea1785f X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-fx0-f226.google.com[209.85.220.226] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265131890 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21472 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: Subject: [Xen-users] Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge failed X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --0016e6d64559c589e7047ea1785f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, sometimes when I start a vps (xm create vps.cfg) I get this error: Error: Device 1 (vif) could not be connected. /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge failed But, I try several times and the domU start. I've attached vif-bridge file. See logs below: Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 kernel: [994563.501959] eth0: port 57(veth466a) entering disabled state Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: offline XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/153/1 Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 kernel: [994563.534239] eth0: port 57(veth466a) entering disabled state Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: brctl delif eth0 veth466a failed Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: ifconfig veth466a down failed Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: Successful vif-bridge offline for veth466a, bridge eth0. Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 kernel: [994563.838084] eth0: port 56(veth466) entering disabled state Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: offline XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/153/0 Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 kernel: [994563.863357] eth0: port 56(veth466) entering disabled state Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: brctl delif eth0 veth466 failed Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: ifconfig veth466 down failed Feb 2 11:53:36 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: Successful vif-bridge offline for veth466, bridge eth0. Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/console/153/0 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/153/0 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/153/1 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/block: remove XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/153/51714 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/block: remove XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/153/51713 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/153/51713 Feb 2 11:53:37 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/xen-hotplug-cleanup: XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/153/51714 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/block: add XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/154/51714 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/block: add XENBUS_PATH=backend/vbd/154/51713 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: online XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/154/0 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 logger: /etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge: online XENBUS_PATH=backend/vif/154/1 Feb 2 11:53:53 dom0 kernel: [994580.723111] device veth466 entered promiscuous mode Can you helpme to debugging the problem? thanks in advance. -- Regards; Israel Garcia --0016e6d64559c589e7047ea1785f Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=vif-bridge Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=vif-bridge Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: file0 IyEvYmluL2Jhc2gKIz09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KIyAvZXRjL3hlbi92aWYtYnJpZGdlCiMK IyBTY3JpcHQgZm9yIGNvbmZpZ3VyaW5nIGEgdmlmIGluIGJyaWRnZWQgbW9kZS4KIyBUaGUgaG90 cGx1Z2dpbmcgc3lzdGVtIHdpbGwgY2FsbCB0aGlzIHNjcmlwdCBpZiBpdCBpcyBzcGVjaWZpZWQg ZWl0aGVyIGluCiMgdGhlIGRldmljZSBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIGdpdmVuIHRvIFhlbmQsIG9yIHRo ZSBkZWZhdWx0IFhlbmQgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbgojIGluIC9ldGMveGVuL3hlbmQtY29uZmlnLnN4 cC4gIElmIHRoZSBzY3JpcHQgaXMgc3BlY2lmaWVkIGluIG5laXRoZXIgb2YgdGhvc2UKIyBwbGFj ZXMsIHRoZW4gdGhpcyBzY3JpcHQgaXMgdGhlIGRlZmF1bHQuCiMKIyBVc2FnZToKIyB2aWYtYnJp ZGdlIChhZGR8cmVtb3ZlfG9ubGluZXxvZmZsaW5lKQojCiMgRW52aXJvbm1lbnQgdmFyczoKIyB2 aWYgICAgICAgICB2aWYgaW50ZXJmYWNlIG5hbWUgKHJlcXVpcmVkKS4KIyBYRU5CVVNfUEFUSCBw YXRoIHRvIHRoaXMgZGV2aWNlJ3MgZGV0YWlscyBpbiB0aGUgWGVuU3RvcmUgKHJlcXVpcmVkKS4K IwojIFJlYWQgZnJvbSB0aGUgc3RvcmU6CiMgYnJpZGdlICBicmlkZ2UgdG8gYWRkIHRoZSB2aWYg dG8gKG9wdGlvbmFsKS4gIERlZmF1bHRzIHRvIHNlYXJjaGluZyBmb3IgdGhlCiMgICAgICAgICBi cmlkZ2UgaXRzZWxmLgojIGlwICAgICAgbGlzdCBvZiBJUCBuZXR3b3JrcyBmb3IgdGhlIHZpZiwg c3BhY2Utc2VwYXJhdGVkIChvcHRpb25hbCkuCiMKIyB1cDoKIyBFbnNsYXZlcyB0aGUgdmlmIGlu dGVyZmFjZSB0byB0aGUgYnJpZGdlIGFuZCBhZGRzIGlwdGFibGVzIHJ1bGVzCiMgZm9yIGl0cyBp cCBhZGRyZXNzZXMgKGlmIGFueSkuCiMKIyBkb3duOgojIFJlbW92ZXMgdGhlIHZpZiBpbnRlcmZh Y2UgZnJvbSB0aGUgYnJpZGdlIGFuZCByZW1vdmVzIHRoZSBpcHRhYmxlcwojIHJ1bGVzIGZvciBp dHMgaXAgYWRkcmVzc2VzIChpZiBhbnkpLgojPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PQoKZGlyPSQoZGly bmFtZSAiJDAiKQouICIkZGlyL3ZpZi1jb21tb24uc2giCgpicmlkZ2U9JHticmlkZ2U6LX0KYnJp ZGdlPSQoeGVuc3RvcmVfcmVhZF9kZWZhdWx0ICIkWEVOQlVTX1BBVEgvYnJpZGdlIiAiJGJyaWRn ZSIpCgppZiBbIC16ICIkYnJpZGdlIiBdCnRoZW4KICBicmlkZ2U9JChicmN0bCBzaG93IHwgY3V0 IC1kICIKIiAtZiAyIHwgY3V0IC1mIDEpCgogIGlmIFsgLXogIiRicmlkZ2UiIF0KICB0aGVuCiAg ICAgZmF0YWwgIkNvdWxkIG5vdCBmaW5kIGJyaWRnZSwgYW5kIG5vbmUgd2FzIHNwZWNpZmllZCIK ICBmaQplbHNlCiAgIwogICMgT2xkIHN0eWxlIGJyaWRnZSBzZXR1cCB3aXRoIG5ldGxvb3AsIHVz ZWQgdG8gaGF2ZSBhIGJyaWRnZSBuYW1lCiAgIyBvZiB4ZW5iclgsIGVuc2xhdmluZyBwZXRoWCBh bmQgdmlmMC5YLCBhbmQgdGhlbiBjb25maWd1cmluZwogICMgZXRoMC4KICAjCiAgIyBOZXcgc3R5 bGUgYnJpZGdlIHNldHVwIGRvZXMgbm90IHVzZSBuZXRsb29wLCBzbyB0aGUgYnJpZGdlIG5hbWUK ICAjIGlzIGV0aFggYW5kIHRoZSBwaHlzaWNhbCBkZXZpY2UgaXMgZW5zbGF2ZWQgcGV0aFgKICAj CiAgIyBTbyBpZi4uLgogICMKICAjICAgLSBVc2VyIGFza3MgZm9yIHhlbmJyWAogICMgICAtIEFO RCB4ZW5iclggZG9lc24ndCBleGlzdAogICMgICAtIEFORCB0aGVyZSBpcyBhIGV0aFggZGV2aWNl IHdoaWNoIGlzIGEgYnJpZGdlCiAgIwogICMgLi50aGVuIHdlIHRyYW5zbGF0ZSB4ZW5iclggdG8g ZXRoWAogICMKICAjIFRoaXMgbGV0cyBvbGQgY29uZmlnIGZpbGVzIHdvcmsgd2l0aG91dCBtb2Rp ZmljYXRpb24KICAjCiAgaWYgWyAhIC1lICIvc3lzL2NsYXNzL25ldC8kYnJpZGdlIiBdICYmIFsg LXogIiR7YnJpZGdlIyN4ZW5icip9IiBdCiAgdGhlbgogICAgIGlmIFsgLWUgIi9zeXMvY2xhc3Mv bmV0L2V0aCR7YnJpZGdlI3hlbmJyfS9icmlkZ2UiIF0KICAgICB0aGVuCiAgICAgICAgYnJpZGdl PSJldGgke2JyaWRnZSN4ZW5icn0iCiAgICAgZmkKICBmaQpmaQoKUkVUPTAKaXAgbGluayBzaG93 ICRicmlkZ2UgMT4vZGV2L251bGwgMj4mMSB8fCBSRVQ9MQppZiBbICIkUkVUIiAtZXEgMSBdCnRo ZW4KICAgIGZhdGFsICJDb3VsZCBub3QgZmluZCBicmlkZ2UgZGV2aWNlICRicmlkZ2UiCmZpCgpj YXNlICIkY29tbWFuZCIgaW4KICAgIG9ubGluZSkKCXNldHVwX2JyaWRnZV9wb3J0ICIkdmlmIgoJ YWRkX3RvX2JyaWRnZSAiJGJyaWRnZSIgIiR2aWYiCiAgICAgICAgZWJ0YWJsZXMgLU4gJHZpZgog ICAgICAgICAgICAgIGVidGFibGVzIC1QICR2aWYgRFJPUAogICAgICAgICAgICAgIGVidGFibGVz IC1BIElOUFVUIC1pICR2aWYgLWogJHZpZgogICAgICAgICAgICAgIGVidGFibGVzIC1BIEZPUldB UkQgLWkgJHZpZiAtaiAkdmlmCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZWJ0YWJsZXMgLUEgJHZpZiAtcCBBUlAg LS1hcnAtb3Bjb2RlIDEgLWogQUNDRVBUCiAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgaWYgWyAhIC16ICIk aXAiIF0KICAgICAgICAgICAgIHRoZW4KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZm9yIG9uZWlwIGluICRpcAog ICAgICAgICAgICAgICBkbwogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGVidGFibGVzIC1BICR2aWYgLXAgSVB2 NCAtLWlwLXNyYyAkb25laXAgLWogQUNDRVBUCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZWJ0YWJsZXMgLUEg JHZpZiAtcCBJUHY0IC0taXAtZHN0ICRvbmVpcCAtaiBBQ0NFUFQKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBl YnRhYmxlcyAtQSAkdmlmIC1wIEFSUCAtLWFycC1vcGNvZGUgMiAtLWFycC1pcC1zcmMgJG9uZWlw IC1qIEFDQ0VQVAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICBkb25lCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgZWJ0YWJsZXMg LUEgJHZpZiAtLWxvZy1wcmVmaXg9ImFycC1kcm9wIiAtLWxvZy1hcnAgLWogRFJPUAogICAgICAg ICAgICAgIGZpCiAgICAgICAgOzsKCiAgICBvZmZsaW5lKQogICAgICAgIGRvX3dpdGhvdXRfZXJy b3IgYnJjdGwgZGVsaWYgIiRicmlkZ2UiICIkdmlmIgogICAgICAgIGRvX3dpdGhvdXRfZXJyb3Ig aWZjb25maWcgIiR2aWYiIGRvd24KICAgICAgICBkb193aXRob3V0X2Vycm9yIGVidGFibGVzIC1E IElOUFVUIC1pICR2aWYgLWogJHZpZgogICAgICAgIGRvX3dpdGhvdXRfZXJyb3IgZWJ0YWJsZXMg LUQgRk9SV0FSRCAtaSAkdmlmIC1qICR2aWYKICAgICAgICBkb193aXRob3V0X2Vycm9yIGVidGFi bGVzIC1GICR2aWYKICAgICAgICBkb193aXRob3V0X2Vycm9yIGVidGFibGVzIC1YICR2aWYKCQog ICAgICAgIDs7CmVzYWMKCiNoYW5kbGVfaXB0YWJsZQoKbG9nIGRlYnVnICJTdWNjZXNzZnVsIHZp Zi1icmlkZ2UgJGNvbW1hbmQgZm9yICR2aWYsIGJyaWRnZSAkYnJpZGdlLiIKaWYgWyAiJGNvbW1h bmQiID09ICJvbmxpbmUiIF0KdGhlbgogIHN1Y2Nlc3MKZmkK --0016e6d64559c589e7047ea1785f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --0016e6d64559c589e7047ea1785f-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 10:32:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:32:58 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcNYY-00025r-Dq; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:32:58 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcNXn-0001jo-Md for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:32:11 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265135541-790f00010000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 11FBD240F72 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:32:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id zGh7hgUZUpy17MVn for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:32:21 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jep@obrien-pifer.com X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ZLiOVhr7cYUA:10 a=UgehdDp3XGQYy8DNxp0A:9 a=KuRTVQya6UHK8iabQAEUbfIw3MgA:4 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 96.10.171.230 Received: from [96.10.171.230] ([96.10.171.230:33190] helo=mailserver.obrien-pifer.com) by cdptpa-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id D7/C6-06838-5BF686B4; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:32:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.22] ([192.168.1.22]) by mailserver.obrien-pifer.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o12IWKQ0021729 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:32:20 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Problem with some win3k3 domUs since crash From: James Pifer To: Xen List Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:32:58 -0500 Message-Id: <1265139179.28828.9.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com[75.180.132.120] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265135542 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21476 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] Problem with some win3k3 domUs since crash X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Yesterday all of my xen servers went down hard and also lost connection to ocfs2. 95% of the domU's came back up ok, but I do have problems with a few windows domUs. They seem to start ok, but them immediately lose connection to the network. If I have them on DHCP they are on long enough to get an address, then they lose connection. If I look at the properties of the NIC it says 1GB connection. I've also tried removing the NICs and adding new ones so they get new MAC addresses. I have a generic win2k3 "image" that I use. I copy it, bring up the domU, rename it, and assign static IP, and I have a new windows domU. This has always worked in the past but now even that is failing to stay on the network. Any ideas on where the problem could be? This is happening with win2k3 domUs on both sles10SP2/xen_3.2.x and SLES11/xen_3.4.2. Thanks, James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 11:01:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:01:13 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcNzs-0003V2-Vu; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:01:13 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcNyz-00034L-G5 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:17 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265137226-093c00080000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 55ADD24102B for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:00:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 5gkjNyaoT9x12GG1 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:27 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: grantmasterflash@gmail.com Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so516975iwn.6 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GstrvcMmWApsXe6mqdO/NG2tTrYBWodGUX5I8bnIVfI=; b=F5WrPnfbpFJMn6WWmTVs9O2mpz/3hB8pl2zPquZJqpTjULv04by7P/BhGMsbzMTTo8 hQJI5suIT4kOeENpY7x1w/B267KAV5UYUOovuvdwTBevHWul8OnmQB2CVBgOuGNo0Gca M3PzWrg0ZdlTed5L9zuBmQQ9FyIXLjiLWPcZg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=AQh+4tk+NGTws7CTRMj0t2nwAi0W1SJznxn1sTOCbsKz7cfpFzxnxQuZUYBf0fxd2D HEV3Ugf9tZcJkrS3IKOIo0ZSvzoAZLeHj0iEEOF5NHF3r7sqlQSD0PMOSWZqctO7oYFw JOzIdbOfL+dy+gRLT/aC84pF0pchl2bWeDp2g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.151.207 with SMTP id d15mr3321206ibw.44.1265137224924; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:00:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <64D0546C5EBBD147B75DE133D798665F03F3F5F6@hugo.eprize.local> References: <64D0546C5EBBD147B75DE133D798665F03F3F5F6@hugo.eprize.local> From: Grant McWilliams Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:00:03 -0800 Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS To: Jeff Sturm X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-iw0-f179.google.com[209.85.223.179] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265137227 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.20 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.20 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BSF_SC0_SA038b, HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21478 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.20 BSF_SC0_SA038b Custom Rule SA038b Cc: Andy Pace , xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1169824927==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1169824927== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450144a6e23e30047ea2b694 --0050450144a6e23e30047ea2b694 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Jeff Sturm wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users- > > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Andy Pace > > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:57 PM > > To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com > > Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS > > > > What are the pro's and cons to each? From my research, iSCSI seems the > way to go > > here, but all the SAN/NAS vendor's I've spoken with live and die > *NFS*, which I've had > > some serious issues with in the past in so far as scalability and > performance... > > Those don't have to be mutually exclusive. From block storage you can > easily carve out some filesystems that you export as NFS. And if you > really do have hundreds of VM's, I doubt you're going to do this on a > single SAN appliance unless I/O is *really* light. > > For what it's worth, my money's on AoE rather than iSCSI. Fast, simple, > extremely easy to setup and manage. I prefer to run the block protocols > on dom0 hosts and export the block devices to domU's (phy:). Tests show > this yields better throughput. > > -Jeff > > "Tests show". Famous last words... I've been throwing around a lot of ideas in this same vein. I currently have 42 VMs running off the same disk in a classroom environment. Things are fine until everyone starts installing software or formatting their disks at the same time. >From the hearsay that I've heard AoE is the fastest network block storage but it's still hard to beat NFS. The problem comes about when you want more than one VM to access a storage device and then performance goes in the toilet because the cluster FS's are very slow. I however, don't make decisions based on hearsay so in the coming months I'll be testing all combinations of NFS, iSCSI, AoE, with GFS and OCFS and any other possibility I can find in common kernels. I'll be comparing these to the speeds of local disk access via ext3 to see how much of a hit (or advantage?) we take by moving storage out of box. Of course to do fast migration the storage has to be somewhere else... Once testing is done I'll be posting the numbers. It's amazing how little benchmarking takes place. I did extensive tests on LVM vs disk files and have still not seen any other numbers on this. Oh well, I guess that will be my contribution. Grant McWilliams Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows." Now they have two problems. --0050450144a6e23e30047ea2b694 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Jeff Sturm <= span dir=3D"ltr"><jeff.sturm@ep= rize.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-use= rs-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xe= n-users-
> bounces@lists.xensource= .com] On Behalf Of Andy Pace
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 11:57 PM
> To: xen-users@lists.x= ensource.com
> Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS
>
> What are the pro's and cons to each? From my research, iSCSI seems= the
way to go
> here, but all the SAN/NAS vendor's I've spoken with live and d= ie
*NFS*, which I've had
> some serious issues with in the past in so far as scalability and
performance...

Those don't have to be mutually exclusive. =C2=A0From block stora= ge you can
easily carve out some filesystems that you export as NFS. =C2=A0And if you<= br> really do have hundreds of VM's, I doubt you're going to do this on= a
single SAN appliance unless I/O is *really* light.

For what it's worth, my money's on AoE rather than iSCSI. =C2=A0Fas= t, simple,
extremely easy to setup and manage. =C2=A0I prefer to run the block protoco= ls
on dom0 hosts and export the block devices to domU's (phy:). =C2=A0Test= s show
this yields better throughput.

-Jeff

"Tests show". Famous last words...=C2=A0 I've been throwing = around a lot of ideas in this same vein. I currently have 42 VMs running of= f the same disk in a classroom environment. Things are fine until everyone = starts installing software or formatting their disks at the same time.

From the hearsay that I've heard AoE is the fastest network block s= torage but it's still hard to beat NFS. The problem comes about when yo= u want more than one VM to access a storage device and then performance goe= s in the toilet because the cluster FS's are very slow. I however, don&= #39;t make decisions based on hearsay so in the coming months I'll be t= esting all combinations of NFS, iSCSI, AoE, with GFS and OCFS and any other= possibility I can find in common kernels. I'll be comparing these to t= he speeds of local disk access via ext3 to see how much of a hit (or advant= age?) we take by moving storage out of box. Of course to do fast migration = the storage has to be somewhere else...

Once testing is done I'll be posting the numbers. It's amazing = how little benchmarking takes place. I did extensive tests on LVM vs disk f= iles and have still not seen any other numbers on this. Oh well, I guess th= at will be my contribution.


Grant McWilliams

Some people, when confronted = with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows."
Now the= y have two problems.


--0050450144a6e23e30047ea2b694-- --===============1169824927== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1169824927==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 11:15:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:15:02 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcODF-0004Qp-UX; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:15:02 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcOCR-00046I-Rs for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:14:11 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265138061-791000550000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp2.versiera.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id D755E240F4E for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp2.versiera.com (smtp2.netcraftcommunications.com [69.90.218.81]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id KyfJb6CFfgL80OH3 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:14:21 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Frank.Pikelner@netcraftcommunications.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.versiera.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E7C34AF4; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:14:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp2.versiera.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.versiera.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KdSnEwb-SB+r; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:14:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from netcraftcommunications.com (unknown [172.20.50.21]) by smtp2.versiera.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5288934A45; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:14:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from 172.20.2.66 ([172.20.2.66]) by bdc03srv04.bdc.int ([172.20.50.21]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:14:21 +0000 Received: from nc155 by 172.20.50.21; 02 Feb 2010 14:14:20 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS From: Frank Pikelner To: Grant McWilliams In-Reply-To: References: <64D0546C5EBBD147B75DE133D798665F03F3F5F6@hugo.eprize.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Organization: NetCraft Communications Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:14:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1265138059.19057.53.camel@nc155> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp2.netcraftcommunications.com[69.90.218.81] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265138061 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21479 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: Andy Pace , Jeff Sturm , xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank.pikelner@netcraftcommunications.com List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > =20 > "Tests show". Famous last words... I've been throwing around a lot of > ideas in this same vein. I currently have 42 VMs running off the same > disk in a classroom environment. Things are fine until everyone starts > installing software or formatting their disks at the same time. >=20 > From the hearsay that I've heard AoE is the fastest network block > storage but it's still hard to beat NFS. The problem comes about when > you want more than one VM to access a storage device and then > performance goes in the toilet because the cluster FS's are very slow. > I however, don't make decisions based on hearsay so in the coming > months I'll be testing all combinations of NFS, iSCSI, AoE, with GFS > and OCFS and any other possibility I can find in common kernels. I'll > be comparing these to the speeds of local disk access via ext3 to see > how much of a hit (or advantage?) we take by moving storage out of > box. Of course to do fast migration the storage has to be somewhere > else... >=20 > Once testing is done I'll be posting the numbers. It's amazing how > little benchmarking takes place. I did extensive tests on LVM vs disk > files and have still not seen any other numbers on this. Oh well, I > guess that will be my contribution. Grant, With what type of drives are you expecting to do the testing? I would be interested in any numbers, but have started to move over to solid state drives. Best, Frank _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 11:26:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:26:55 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcOOl-0005Hq-6C; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:26:55 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcONx-0004xp-N4 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:26:05 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265138775-0c0200410000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 9A24624114D for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:26:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id utvtoRPcCmxd7r8V for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:26:15 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: grantmasterflash@gmail.com Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so553994iwn.6 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:26:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=hp55S8HmjyT1AJ02HOEpjunbvur2r511vCUAeb6GDic=; b=QjnHJ/uJS/0F0cXwo/BY65DrZHUc3Z2NXSGaZgCcqyw3YSF604oyJZLB/QGlIFH0K2 2DEzLOTJBIR2rQgEzH64vIaox2SBmZ13PrAl5mUTdabY1gvkU/zfVWL8o1CrvoiA6T6K +i/o3yE/56+LJnCXmgUkYc+KFkqG24EAetAvM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=YRnRh64cHVi8m/TR4iU6VXkkBWHJ66JKKQU2rjKoKQ+GivMaFaOhI/tE5aCFVTEg+J 9FgWmt9dnY05kWaF55EaMQid75nDoUwmiF24hHYvtzAGzXGmnQeZ7OEJlJ2k1t1jWBu3 VPS1rTTYAEHPBybD9qF5p+3UjUAlNdVOH9EYY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.167.65 with SMTP id p1mr776607iby.20.1265138774209; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:26:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1265138059.19057.53.camel@nc155> References: <64D0546C5EBBD147B75DE133D798665F03F3F5F6@hugo.eprize.local> <1265138059.19057.53.camel@nc155> From: Grant McWilliams Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:25:53 -0800 Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS To: frank.pikelner@netcraftcommunications.com X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-iw0-f179.google.com[209.85.223.179] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265138775 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21479 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: Andy Pace , Jeff Sturm , xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1172433955==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1172433955== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636d3448d3a753c047ea31331 --001636d3448d3a753c047ea31331 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Frank Pikelner < frank.pikelner@netcraftcommunications.com> wrote: > > > > > "Tests show". Famous last words... I've been throwing around a lot of > > ideas in this same vein. I currently have 42 VMs running off the same > > disk in a classroom environment. Things are fine until everyone starts > > installing software or formatting their disks at the same time. > > > > From the hearsay that I've heard AoE is the fastest network block > > storage but it's still hard to beat NFS. The problem comes about when > > you want more than one VM to access a storage device and then > > performance goes in the toilet because the cluster FS's are very slow. > > I however, don't make decisions based on hearsay so in the coming > > months I'll be testing all combinations of NFS, iSCSI, AoE, with GFS > > and OCFS and any other possibility I can find in common kernels. I'll > > be comparing these to the speeds of local disk access via ext3 to see > > how much of a hit (or advantage?) we take by moving storage out of > > box. Of course to do fast migration the storage has to be somewhere > > else... > > > > Once testing is done I'll be posting the numbers. It's amazing how > > little benchmarking takes place. I did extensive tests on LVM vs disk > > files and have still not seen any other numbers on this. Oh well, I > > guess that will be my contribution. > > Grant, > > With what type of drives are you expecting to do the testing? I would be > interested in any numbers, but have started to move over to solid state > drives. > > Best, > > Frank > > My tests will be relative to the network protocols. I'd assume that the differences between local storage and network storage will be the same no matter the backend hardware. I too am looking into RAIDs of SSDs for IO reasons. I need access time more than I need throughput. Drives are getting so large that if I throw eight 1.5 TB drives in an array for speed reasons I end up with 5x the storage that I need for my project. I don't have a problem spending the same and getting less storage if I get more performance. We'll see. Grant McWilliams Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows." Now they have two problems. --001636d3448d3a753c047ea31331 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Frank Pikelner = <frank.pikelner@netcraftcommunications.com> wrote:
=

>
> "Tests show". Famous last words... =C2=A0I've been throw= ing around a lot of
> ideas in this same vein. I currently have 42 VMs running off the same<= br> > disk in a classroom environment. Things are fine until everyone starts=
> installing software or formatting their disks at the same time.
>
> From the hearsay that I've heard AoE is the fastest network block<= br> > storage but it's still hard to beat NFS. The problem comes about w= hen
> you want more than one VM to access a storage device and then
> performance goes in the toilet because the cluster FS's are very s= low.
> I however, don't make decisions based on hearsay so in the coming<= br> > months I'll be testing all combinations of NFS, iSCSI, AoE, with G= FS
> and OCFS and any other possibility I can find in common kernels. I'= ;ll
> be comparing these to the speeds of local disk access via ext3 to see<= br> > how much of a hit (or advantage?) we take by moving storage out of
> box. Of course to do fast migration the storage has to be somewhere > else...
>
> Once testing is done I'll be posting the numbers. It's amazing= how
> little benchmarking takes place. I did extensive tests on LVM vs disk<= br> > files and have still not seen any other numbers on this. Oh well, I > guess that will be my contribution.

Grant,

With what type of drives are you expecting to do the testing? I would be interested in any numbers, but have started to move over to solid state
drives.

Best,

Frank


My tests will be relative to the network p= rotocols. I'd assume that the differences between local
storage and = network storage will be the same no matter the backend hardware.

I too am looking into RAIDs of SSDs for IO reasons. I need access time more= than I need throughput.
Drives are getting so large that if I throw eig= ht 1.5 TB drives in an array for speed reasons I end up with
5x the sto= rage that I need for my project. I don't have a problem spending the sa= me and getting less storage
if I get more performance. We'll see.


Grant Mc= Williams

Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I = know, I'll use Windows."
Now they have two problems.




=C2=A0

--001636d3448d3a753c047ea31331-- --===============1172433955== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1172433955==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 11:34:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:34:14 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcOVq-0006SX-AV; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:34:14 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcOV3-000659-EP for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:33:25 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265139215-161500330000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 6B39F241168 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:33:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f179.google.com (mail-iw0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 6OhxqWNBxx1erAB3 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:33:35 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: grantmasterflash@gmail.com Received: by iwn9 with SMTP id 9so565011iwn.6 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:33:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=hYurNE/eyU3YwK34BwU2X5+cLnCZmEj/N3t3HLU+q48=; b=PGoSLhrcDYpI82BcO8TkWDT149rClYbZokhcY45Y+hEMTRP+Bzs3obxomDTzxdco1y Uwop7QCp0svygR1ljpVDYg4cywvaoRCJ/TgUoxOIQDn673SVw13qilGA8VUwN4mQbkDC G0RiW10/rk9rpCw2o+WAfOMcYywpFOtuR4v/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=FjbeQSw8wHtsTBgWxiE0b+I2cqIwmMwT74oelv7KTAtrdg7YjdwyZabpDhUm0FhB6c lcpnuJrhoVJXn81SjUB643hOP4+hYOHQe+Q0Q4yfCzh0ApjklaCcFGkesGAlk9f1AEH3 YW3XfmA/RhTbQCDQwBEP99KFjHxTnY7HcavDQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.182.142 with SMTP id cc14mr6883623ibb.81.1265139214727; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 11:33:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Grant McWilliams Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:31:45 -0800 Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS Subject: Re: Subject: [Xen-users] iSCSI vs NFS To: Joseph Coleman X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-iw0-f179.google.com[209.85.223.179] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265139215 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21479 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: "APace@singlehop.com" , "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1618485660==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1618485660== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d31077c3f25047ea32d7f --0016364d31077c3f25047ea32d7f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Joseph Coleman < joe.coleman@infinitecampus.com> wrote: > Andy, > > I did recently switch to iscsi in an ocfs2 format clustered on 2 servers > for testing and it is a lot better. However, there is a current bug with = it > tht Novell is writing a patch for me on and I should hopefully have it to= day > or tomorrow. I also have 2 other servers that have their own iscsi volume= s > tied to them. All in all I am extremely happy with the consistent > performance I am getting for the ISCSI volumes and highly recommend them. > > Pros and cons: > > NFS: > > Extemely easy to manage. And if you SAN provider has de-dupe support the > NFS volumes de-dupe really good. But Performance is bad and will cause so= me > thinning in the hairline. > > Iscsi: > > Consistent reliable performance can be used as a cluster aware file syste= m > depending how you format it out. > > Doesn=E2=80=99t de-dupe nearly as well as NFS does and isn=E2=80=99t as e= asy to manage or > resize on the fly like NFS so you need to keep an eye on your volumes and > manage them a little more closely. > > Hope this helps if you have further questions shoot me an email > joe.coleman@infinitecampus.com > Joe, The iSCSI with OCFS is faster than NFS? Where do you suppose the speed increase is coming from? It would seem that you have a lot more layers than before and the addition a clusterfs. I haven't seen any recent speed tests on cluster fses but about 2 years ago another company I contracted with canceled their Xen deployment because the performance hit from GFS2 cripple= d their servers. It was somewhere in the order of 30% of the speed of native ext3 on local storage. I left the project after that so I'm not sure if the= y re-evaluated later. As I've mentioned in another thread I'm going to be doing extensive testing on these various methods. Do you have any words of advice on your testing methods? Grant McWilliams Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows." Now they have two problems. --0016364d31077c3f25047ea32d7f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Joseph Coleman <= span dir=3D"ltr"><joe.= coleman@infinitecampus.com> wrote:

Andy,

I did recently switch to iscsi in an ocfs2 format clustered on 2 servers for testing and it is a lot better. However, there i= s a current bug with it tht Novell is writing a patch for me on and I should hopefully have it today or tomorrow. I also have 2 other servers that have their own iscsi volumes tied to them. All in all I am extremely happy with = the consistent performance I am getting for the ISCSI volumes and highly recomm= end them.

Pros and cons:

NFS:

Extemely easy to manage. And if you SAN provider has de-dupe support the NFS volumes de-dupe really good. But Performance is bad= and will cause some thinning in the hairline.

Iscsi:

Consistent reliable performance can be used as a cluster aware file system depending how you format it out.

Doesn=E2=80=99t de-dupe nearly as well as NFS does and isn=E2=80=99t as easy to manage or resize on the fly like NFS so you need to keep an eye = on your volumes and manage them a little more closely.

Hope this helps if you have further questions shoot me an email j= oe.coleman@infinitecampus.com


Joe,
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 The iSCSI with OCF= S is faster than NFS?=C2=A0 Where do you suppose the speed increase is comi= ng from? It would seem that you have a lot more layers than before and the = addition a clusterfs.=C2=A0 I haven't seen any recent speed tests on cl= uster fses but about 2 years ago another company I contracted with canceled= their Xen deployment because the performance hit from GFS2 crippled their = servers. It was somewhere in the order of 30% of the speed of native ext3 o= n local storage. I left the project after that so I'm not sure if they = re-evaluated later. As I've mentioned in another thread I'm going t= o be doing extensive testing on these various methods.

Do you have any words of advice on your testing methods?


Grant McWilliams

Some people, when confronted with a prob= lem, think "I know, I'll use Windows."
Now they have two = problems.




--0016364d31077c3f25047ea32d7f-- --===============1618485660== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1618485660==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 12:21:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:21:08 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcPFE-0008OU-5W; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:21:08 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcPER-00083A-UG for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:20:19 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265142029-2d4200320000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 46C43241149 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:20:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.148]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id CczyYH4hhyKWhpgA for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:20:29 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: sergiocharpinel@gmail.com Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 26so104024eyw.8 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:20:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=++B+Z6ZCAXAPCheeAiU4LesmKqx964FSwf6XoSCX5uI=; b=yFrAh5oSt0oVHVIl9qZ1CRJrk62e4PO0vqO9LWUbfAcIme/a2cZH4GHlZKWLfaFxDk fa756+SU3ampO1BBEUQ61v5nqjykgwK3ODTu9rhgpU5BKoXCxStMcmaAqInx3ry4HDvx 60kqYAqYZmCRJvIGpmC6wkCD814jIjoJvAzGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ZYzQDGPtGe/ytclKTwFMXbtGKf4t5yVasVxM58619NfwPj3qZAMoWw8j1MsCOYt3JZ OtMlwwpCOJFSLbpe07Yajr/ZDOJa+KbG+cMZNP/THGifev0GCr/pwmr1nFHs50NTioyU TBq9uNsWbWaUnBClK3Ve9mAkM7fCt2LkQo0FM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.1.143 with SMTP id 15mr5592932ebf.42.1265142027435; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:20:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 17:20:27 -0300 Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: PF_RING + Xen From: "Sergio Charpinel Jr." To: ntop@unipi.it, xen-users@lists.xensource.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Barracuda-Connect: ey-out-1920.google.com[74.125.78.148] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265142030 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21483 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: Subject: [Xen-users] PF_RING + Xen X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi, I'd like to know if there is someone using PF_RING + Xen guest or some research in this regard. How is the performance compared to a non-virtualized machine, what configuration we could do to improve it, etc. I'm planning to implement it, if we could not loose considerable perfomance. Thanks -- Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 12:59:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:59:32 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcPqO-0001ev-Az; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:59:32 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcPos-0001Eo-Ps for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:57:59 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265144287-3fea00360000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-pz0-f200.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 8B37F2410F4 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:58:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f200.google.com (mail-pz0-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 4LG5qrlhwjlBImbV for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:58:07 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: alex.faq8@gmail.com Received: by pzk38 with SMTP id 38so564869pzk.9 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:58:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=KFM+DLZZfzzp4Wg3kAtmfA2Hsh+tClDsrsXH2kuylhs=; b=iJogbJGVW0KL9NXx7ap3c5z3TcS36sDN2zDANvb7PdUXuLbWI6jiQ9WyV3R5L6Y5VS gzZQ7n297ATozwPC7DciuLb9UR0F9mudAg2z2fkgAJu/+6+eXZLykyrPUOP3WGgOd6Ki /jU7O7dJ909B6IWMmoWFw4K9pCZBVyvrFj/04= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=txBjvpSjmfajKMtClWMouDGVv6LkHaZ28vFgmc8httpCcemwPIF9NQLvIUoSioxuqI sEMyuM7t2C9sr6jyh/e9JhyFwQ+RM7m43cHgAKKxArz1buYcEIvffiVJ/1R6oYsRO29j qDc5Ty095zS7/HS1dFExQhXSaIiYcSR11ztSk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.248.7 with SMTP id v7mr4478200rvh.237.1265144287165; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:58:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <695200da1001280330r6720970ay8551dd709969d50e@mail.gmail.com> <90eb1dc71001280651y772899c7h6049ab7763c33aed@mail.gmail.com> <695200da1001281419v7c1f3ff7sa860ef2c05223ab2@mail.gmail.com> <695200da1001290157g5c481fc4ua3885f71ef7a1051@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:58:07 +0300 Message-ID: <9e97b1231002021258h39f721e9ub94c698e8ffd4ac7@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] BUG: soft lockup Subject: Re: [Xen-users] BUG: soft lockup From: alex To: Dana Rawding X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-pz0-f200.google.com[209.85.222.200] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265144287 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.50 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.50 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BSF_RULE7568M, HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21485 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.50 BSF_RULE7568M Custom Rule 7568M Cc: Xen List X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1221572822==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1221572822== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd17fe4d37d8d047ea45bd9 --000e0cd17fe4d37d8d047ea45bd9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have this problem too. Xen 3.3.1 Debian Lenny. LA on server up to 10-15, all domUs freeze and I can't do anything. Please test I fix this problem by xm sched-credit -d 0 -w 512 . [787717.425090] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [watchdog/0:5] [787717.425090] Modules linked in: xt_tcpudp xt_physdev iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables tun bridge ipv6 nfsd auth_rpcgss exportfs nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc loop joydev igb psmouse pcspkr i2c_i801 serio_raw button i2c_core evdev dca ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mirror dm_log dm_snapshot dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic usbhid hid ff_memless ata_piix libata dock sd_mod ide_pci_generic ide_core ehci_hcd uhci_hcd 3w_9xxx scsi_mod thermal processor fan thermal_sys [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [787717.432148] CPU 0: [787717.432148] Modules linked in: xt_tcpudp xt_physdev iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables tun bridge ipv6 nfsd auth_rpcgss exportfs nfs lockd nfs_acl sunrpc loop joydev igb psmouse pcspkr i2c_i801 serio_raw button i2c_core evdev dca ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mirror dm_log dm_snapshot dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic usbhid hid ff_memless ata_piix libata dock sd_mod ide_pci_generic ide_core ehci_hcd uhci_hcd 3w_9xxx scsi_mod thermal processor fan thermal_sys [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [787717.436173] Pid: 5, comm: watchdog/0 Not tainted 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64 #1 [787717.436173] RIP: e030:[] [] watchdog+0xbe/0x1cf [787717.436173] RSP: e02b:ffff880bce0d9ef0 EFLAGS: 00000207 [787717.436173] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff880bcb4e5400 RCX: 0002cc64939f91fe [787717.436173] RDX: ffff880081656000 RSI: ffffffff804fe460 RDI: ffffffff8053a000 [787717.436173] RBP: ffff880bcb4e5400 R08: ffff880001be3040 R09: ffff880bce0d9e30 [787717.436173] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000399 [787717.436173] R13: 00000000000b3192 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 [787717.436173] FS: 00007f0cfbb3e6e0(0000) GS:ffffffff80539000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [787717.436173] CS: e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 [787717.436173] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [787717.436173] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [787717.436173] [787717.436173] Call Trace: [787717.436173] [] ? watchdog+0x0/0x1cf [787717.436173] [] ? kthread+0x47/0x74 [787717.436173] [] ? schedule_tail+0x27/0x5c [787717.436173] [] ? child_rip+0xa/0x12 [787717.436173] [] ? kthread+0x0/0x74 [787717.436173] [] ? child_rip+0x0/0x12 [787717.436173] I fix this problem by xm sched-credit -d 0 -w 512 . 2010/1/31 Dana Rawding > Hi all, > > I've been experiencing a rash of CPU lockups on a number of domU's > recently. It's been happening on two different servers. About a year ago I > had this problem every once in a while but it was not frequent. I was > running Ubuntu with Xen 3.1 and 2.6.24-18 back then. I'm now running Xen > 3.3 and 2.6.24-26. > > What I have noticed is that just prior to the lockups the domU's had high > cpu loads. The domU that I have the most problems with is a Zimbra server. > My guess is that a rash of spam comes through and cpu loads get high, then > the cpu's lock up. Originally I had it running with 1 cpu but have since > upped it 2 then 3 cpu's. > > I have been collecting the lockup messages and have posed a few below. Any > ideas? Recommendations? > > Thanks, > Dana > > > [138077.172283] ======================= > [138075.147398] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [kswapd0:97] > [138075.147411] > [138075.147419] Pid: 97, comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G D (2.6.24-26-xen #1) > [138075.147426] EIP: 0061:[] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 > [138075.147441] EIP is at _spin_lock+0x7/0x10 > [138075.147447] EAX: c1da48ec EBX: 00000000 ECX: 220c7000 EDX: 00000000 > [138075.147453] ESI: 8b804067 EDI: c1da48ec EBP: 00000f28 ESP: ed707dec > [138075.147459] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0069 > [138075.147471] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 080f0010 CR3: 2213b000 CR4: 00000660 > [138075.147482] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 > [138075.147488] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 > [138075.147495] [] page_check_address+0x1cb/0x3c0 > [138075.147514] [] xen_invlpg_mask+0x38/0x40 > [138075.147529] [] page_referenced_one+0x6e/0x190 > [138075.147541] [] page_referenced+0xec/0x130 > [138075.147552] [] shrink_active_list+0x18f/0x5c0 > [138075.147567] [] shrink_zone+0xdd/0x100 > [138075.147578] [] kswapd+0x44c/0x490 > [138075.147589] [] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 > [138075.147603] [] complete+0x40/0x60 > [138075.147614] [] kswapd+0x0/0x490 > [138075.147625] [] kthread+0x42/0x70 > [138075.147635] [] kthread+0x0/0x70 > [138075.147646] [] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > [138075.147658] ======================= > [138088.987826] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [java:23215] > [138088.987841] > [138088.987846] Pid: 23215, comm: java Tainted: G D (2.6.24-26-xen #1) > [138088.987850] EIP: 0061:[] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 1 > [138088.987862] EIP is at _spin_lock+0x7/0x10 > [138088.987866] EAX: c1da48ec EBX: 00000000 ECX: c1da48e0 EDX: 00000ca8 > [138088.987870] ESI: 8b804067 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e20c7ca8 ESP: e226be04 > [138088.987873] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069 > [138088.987883] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 940ef020 CR3: 2211f000 CR4: 00000660 > [138088.987891] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 > [138088.987896] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 > [138088.987901] [] unmap_vmas+0x43d/0xae0 > [138088.987922] [] kmap_atomic+0x1c/0x30 > [138088.987941] [] kunmap_atomic+0x3d/0x60 > [138088.987957] [] vma_adjust+0x1c8/0x440 > [138088.987967] [] unmap_region+0x95/0x120 > [138088.987975] [] do_munmap+0x147/0x1f0 > [138088.987983] [] mmap_region+0x70/0x450 > [138088.987991] [] security_file_mmap+0x27/0x30 > [138088.988001] [] do_mmap_pgoff+0x312/0x330 > [138088.988008] [] sys_mmap2+0xbb/0xd0 > [138088.988016] [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > [138088.988023] [] svc_accept+0x150/0x410 > [138088.988032] ======================= > > > [66916.451144] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [java:2758] > [66928.193453] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [java:3419] > > > [336990.703192] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [ps:32586] > [336990.703206] > [336990.703214] Pid: 32586, comm: ps Tainted: G D (2.6.24-26-xen #1) > [336990.703221] EIP: 0061:[] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 1 > [336990.703235] EIP is at _spin_lock+0x7/0x10 > [336990.703241] EAX: c1dbc72c EBX: 00000000 ECX: c1dbc720 EDX: 00000007 > [336990.703247] ESI: 57b51067 EDI: 00000001 EBP: e2cb93c8 ESP: e2033e4c > [336990.703253] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069 > [336990.703266] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 08079004 CR3: 23651000 CR4: 00000660 > [336990.703275] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 > [336990.703282] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 > [336990.703288] [] handle_mm_fault+0xae6/0x1360 > [336990.703307] [] rb_insert_color+0x77/0xe0 > [336990.703325] [] do_page_fault+0x35e/0xe70 > [336990.703337] [] vma_merge+0x144/0x1d0 > [336990.703349] [] do_brk+0x195/0x240 > [336990.703362] [] sys_brk+0xb6/0xf0 > [336990.703374] [] do_page_fault+0x0/0xe70 > [336990.703384] [] error_code+0x35/0x40 > [336990.703396] ======================= > [337005.938292] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 11s! > [zmlocalconfig:11371] > [337005.938306] > [337005.938312] Pid: 11371, comm: zmlocalconfig Tainted: G D > (2.6.24-26-xen #1) > [337005.938318] EIP: 0061:[] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 2 > [337005.938330] EIP is at _spin_lock+0x7/0x10 > [337005.938335] EAX: ec64a870 EBX: ec64a870 ECX: 00000002 EDX: ec64a871 > [337005.938339] ESI: 00000000 EDI: c03fe800 EBP: c1261e38 ESP: c1261d7c > [337005.938343] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069 > [337005.938357] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 08128000 CR3: 25d8e000 CR4: 00000660 > [337005.938364] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 > [337005.938370] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 > [337005.938376] [] page_lock_anon_vma+0x20/0x30 > [337005.938391] [] page_referenced+0x8d/0x130 > [337005.938401] [] shrink_active_list+0x18f/0x5c0 > [337005.938411] [] get_dirty_limits+0x16/0x200 > [337005.938421] [] mb_cache_shrink_fn+0x1e/0x100 [mbcache] > [337005.938435] [] shrink_zone+0xdd/0x100 > [337005.938444] [] try_to_free_pages+0x152/0x250 > [337005.938453] [] __alloc_pages+0x14b/0x390 > [337005.938463] [] do_sync_read+0xd5/0x120 > [337005.938475] [] __get_free_pages+0x37/0x50 > [337005.938483] [] copy_process+0xa6/0x1210 > [337005.938493] [] d_alloc+0x114/0x1a0 > [337005.938503] [] do_fork+0x40/0x260 > [337005.938511] [] copy_to_user+0x30/0x60 > [337005.938523] [] sys_clone+0x36/0x40 > [337005.938530] [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > [337005.938542] ======================= > [336990.803889] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [kswapd0:103] > [336990.803907] > [336990.803915] Pid: 103, comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G D (2.6.24-26-xen > #1) > [336990.803922] EIP: 0061:[] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0 > [336990.803940] EIP is at _spin_lock+0xa/0x10 > [336990.803948] EAX: c1dbc86c EBX: 00000000 ECX: 22cc3000 EDX: 00000000 > [336990.803955] ESI: 57b47067 EDI: c1dbc86c EBP: 00000ff0 ESP: ed725dec > [336990.803961] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0069 > [336990.803976] CR0: 8005003b CR2: b791e6d9 CR3: 23e3b000 CR4: 00000660 > [336990.803986] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000 > [336990.803992] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400 > [336990.804001] [] page_check_address+0x1cb/0x3c0 > [336990.804026] [] page_referenced_one+0x6e/0x190 > [336990.804039] [] page_referenced+0xec/0x130 > [336990.804049] [] shrink_active_list+0x18f/0x5c0 > [336990.804064] [] memmove+0x36/0x40 > [336990.804079] [] get_dirty_limits+0x16/0x200 > [336990.804089] [] call_rcu+0x97/0xa0 > [336990.804102] [] mb_cache_shrink_fn+0x1e/0x100 [mbcache] > [336990.804120] [] shrink_zone+0xdd/0x100 > [336990.804132] [] kswapd+0x44c/0x490 > [336990.804145] [] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 > [336990.804160] [] complete+0x40/0x60 > [336990.804172] [] kswapd+0x0/0x490 > [336990.804183] [] kthread+0x42/0x70 > [336990.804194] [] kthread+0x0/0x70 > [336990.804206] [] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > [336990.804218] ======================= > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > -- Best Regards, alex.faq8@gmail.com --000e0cd17fe4d37d8d047ea45bd9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have this problem too.
Xen 3.3.1 Debian Lenny.
LA on server up=20 to 10-15, all domUs freeze and I can't do anything.
Please test I fi= x this problem by xm sched-credit -d 0 -w 512 .

[787717.425090]=20 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [watchdog/0:5]
[787717.425090] Modules linked in: xt_tcpudp xt_physdev iptable_filter=20 ip_tables x_tables tun bridge ipv6 nfsd auth_rpcgss exportfs nfs lockd=20 nfs_acl sunrpc loop joydev igb psmouse pcspkr i2c_i801 serio_raw button=20 i2c_core evdev dca ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mirror dm_log dm_snapshot dm_mod=20 sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic usbhid hid ff_memless ata_piix libata dock=20 sd_mod ide_pci_generic ide_core ehci_hcd uhci_hcd 3w_9xxx scsi_mod=20 thermal processor fan thermal_sys [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[787717.432148] CPU 0:
[787717.432148] Modules linked in: xt_tcpudp xt_physdev iptable_filter=20 ip_tables x_tables tun bridge ipv6 nfsd auth_rpcgss exportfs nfs lockd=20 nfs_acl sunrpc loop joydev igb psmouse pcspkr i2c_i801 serio_raw button=20 i2c_core evdev dca ext3 jbd mbcache dm_mirror dm_log dm_snapshot dm_mod=20 sg sr_mod cdrom ata_generic usbhid hid ff_memless ata_piix libata dock=20 sd_mod ide_pci_generic ide_core ehci_hcd uhci_hcd 3w_9xxx scsi_mod=20 thermal processor fan thermal_sys [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[787717.436173] Pid: 5, comm: watchdog/0 Not tainted 2.6.26-1-xen-amd64=20 #1
[787717.436173] RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8025ed13>]=A0=20 [<ffffffff8025ed13>] watchdog+0xbe/0x1cf
[787717.436173] RSP: e02b:ffff880bce0d9ef0=A0 EFLAGS: 00000207
[787717.436173] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff880bcb4e5400 RCX:=20 0002cc64939f91fe
[787717.436173] RDX: ffff880081656000 RSI: ffffffff804fe460 RDI:=20 ffffffff8053a000
[787717.436173] RBP: ffff880bcb4e5400 R08: ffff880001be3040 R09:=20 ffff880bce0d9e30
[787717.436173] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:=20 0000000000000399
[787717.436173] R13: 00000000000b3192 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:=20 0000000000000000
[787717.436173] FS:=A0 00007f0cfbb3e6e0(0000) GS:ffffffff80539000(0000)=20 knlGS:0000000000000000
[787717.436173] CS:=A0 e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000
[787717.436173] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:=20 0000000000000000
[787717.436173] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7:=20 0000000000000400
[787717.436173]
[787717.436173] Call Trace:
[787717.436173]=A0 [<ffffffff8025ec55>] ? watchdog+0x0/0x1cf
[787717.436173]=A0 [<ffffffff8023f56b>] ? kthread+0x47/0x74
[787717.436173]=A0 [<ffffffff8022839f>] ? schedule_tail+0x27/0x5c
[787717.436173]=A0 [<ffffffff8020be28>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x12
[787717.436173]=A0 [<ffffffff8023f524>] ? kthread+0x0/0x74
[787717.436173]=A0 [<ffffffff8020be1e>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x12
[787717.436173]



I fix this problem by xm sched-credit -d 0 -w 512 .

=
2010/1/31 Dana Rawding <= ;dana@twc-inc.net>
Hi all,

I've been experiencing a rash of CPU lockups on a number of domU's = recently. =A0It's been happening on two different servers. =A0About a y= ear ago I had this problem every once in a while but it was not frequent. = =A0I was running Ubuntu with Xen 3.1 and 2.6.24-18 back then. =A0I'm no= w running Xen 3.3 and 2.6.24-26.

What I have noticed is that just prior to the lockups the domU's had hi= gh cpu loads. =A0The domU that I have the most problems with is a Zimbra se= rver. =A0My guess is that a rash of spam comes through and cpu loads get hi= gh, then the cpu's lock up. =A0Originally I had it running with 1 cpu b= ut have since upped it 2 then 3 cpu's.

I have been collecting the lockup messages and have posed a few below. =A0A= ny ideas? =A0Recommendations?

Thanks,
Dana


[138077.172283] =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
[138075.147398] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [kswapd0:97]
[138075.147411]
[138075.147419] Pid: 97, comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G =A0 =A0 =A0D (2.6.24-26-x= en #1)
[138075.147426] EIP: 0061:[<c03286e7>] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0
[138075.147441] EIP is at _spin_lock+0x7/0x10
[138075.147447] EAX: c1da48ec EBX: 00000000 ECX: 220c7000 EDX: 00000000
[138075.147453] ESI: 8b804067 EDI: c1da48ec EBP: 00000f28 ESP: ed707dec
[138075.147459] =A0DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0069
[138075.147471] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 080f0010 CR3: 2213b000 CR4: 00000660
[138075.147482] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[138075.147488] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[138075.147495] =A0[<c01773cb>] page_check_address+0x1cb/0x3c0
[138075.147514] =A0[<c0119868>] xen_invlpg_mask+0x38/0x40
[138075.147529] =A0[<c017762e>] page_referenced_one+0x6e/0x190
[138075.147541] =A0[<c017875c>] page_referenced+0xec/0x130
[138075.147552] =A0[<c01671cf>] shrink_active_list+0x18f/0x5c0
[138075.147567] =A0[<c016826d>] shrink_zone+0xdd/0x100
[138075.147578] =A0[<c01688cc>] kswapd+0x44c/0x490
[138075.147589] =A0[<c013bb00>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[138075.147603] =A0[<c011e270>] complete+0x40/0x60
[138075.147614] =A0[<c0168480>] kswapd+0x0/0x490
[138075.147625] =A0[<c013b842>] kthread+0x42/0x70
[138075.147635] =A0[<c013b800>] kthread+0x0/0x70
[138075.147646] =A0[<c0105bb7>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[138075.147658] =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
[138088.987826] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [java:23215]
[138088.987841]
[138088.987846] Pid: 23215, comm: java Tainted: G =A0 =A0 =A0D (2.6.24-26-x= en #1)
[138088.987850] EIP: 0061:[<c03286e7>] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 1
[138088.987862] EIP is at _spin_lock+0x7/0x10
[138088.987866] EAX: c1da48ec EBX: 00000000 ECX: c1da48e0 EDX: 00000ca8
[138088.987870] ESI: 8b804067 EDI: 00000000 EBP: e20c7ca8 ESP: e226be04
[138088.987873] =A0DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069
[138088.987883] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 940ef020 CR3: 2211f000 CR4: 00000660
[138088.987891] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[138088.987896] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[138088.987901] =A0[<c016d88d>] unmap_vmas+0x43d/0xae0
[138088.987922] =A0[<c011959c>] kmap_atomic+0x1c/0x30
[138088.987941] =A0[<c01192fd>] kunmap_atomic+0x3d/0x60
[138088.987957] =A0[<c0173ee8>] vma_adjust+0x1c8/0x440
[138088.987967] =A0[<c0173765>] unmap_region+0x95/0x120
[138088.987975] =A0[<c0174387>] do_munmap+0x147/0x1f0
[138088.987983] =A0[<c0174c90>] mmap_region+0x70/0x450
[138088.987991] =A0[<c01db3b7>] security_file_mmap+0x27/0x30
[138088.988001] =A0[<c0175472>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x312/0x330
[138088.988008] =A0[<c010a02b>] sys_mmap2+0xbb/0xd0
[138088.988016] =A0[<c0105832>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[138088.988023] =A0[<c0320000>] svc_accept+0x150/0x410
[138088.988032] =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D


[66916.451144] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [java:2758]
[66928.193453] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [java:3419]


[336990.703192] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [ps:32586]
[336990.703206]
[336990.703214] Pid: 32586, comm: ps Tainted: G =A0 =A0 =A0D (2.6.24-26-xen= #1)
[336990.703221] EIP: 0061:[<c03286e7>] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 1
[336990.703235] EIP is at _spin_lock+0x7/0x10
[336990.703241] EAX: c1dbc72c EBX: 00000000 ECX: c1dbc720 EDX: 00000007
[336990.703247] ESI: 57b51067 EDI: 00000001 EBP: e2cb93c8 ESP: e2033e4c
[336990.703253] =A0DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069
[336990.703266] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 08079004 CR3: 23651000 CR4: 00000660
[336990.703275] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[336990.703282] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[336990.703288] =A0[<c0171646>] handle_mm_fault+0xae6/0x1360
[336990.703307] =A0[<c020e057>] rb_insert_color+0x77/0xe0
[336990.703325] =A0[<c032a27e>] do_page_fault+0x35e/0xe70
[336990.703337] =A0[<c01745d4>] vma_merge+0x144/0x1d0
[336990.703349] =A0[<c0174b75>] do_brk+0x195/0x240
[336990.703362] =A0[<c0175126>] sys_brk+0xb6/0xf0
[336990.703374] =A0[<c0329f20>] do_page_fault+0x0/0xe70
[336990.703384] =A0[<c0328bc5>] error_code+0x35/0x40
[336990.703396] =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
[337005.938292] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 11s! [zmlocalconfig:1137= 1]
[337005.938306]
[337005.938312] Pid: 11371, comm: zmlocalconfig Tainted: G =A0 =A0 =A0D (2.= 6.24-26-xen #1)
[337005.938318] EIP: 0061:[<c03286e7>] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 2
[337005.938330] EIP is at _spin_lock+0x7/0x10
[337005.938335] EAX: ec64a870 EBX: ec64a870 ECX: 00000002 EDX: ec64a871
[337005.938339] ESI: 00000000 EDI: c03fe800 EBP: c1261e38 ESP: c1261d7c
[337005.938343] =A0DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0069
[337005.938357] CR0: 8005003b CR2: 08128000 CR3: 25d8e000 CR4: 00000660
[337005.938364] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[337005.938370] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[337005.938376] =A0[<c01771f0>] page_lock_anon_vma+0x20/0x30
[337005.938391] =A0[<c01786fd>] page_referenced+0x8d/0x130
[337005.938401] =A0[<c01671cf>] shrink_active_list+0x18f/0x5c0
[337005.938411] =A0[<c0164286>] get_dirty_limits+0x16/0x200
[337005.938421] =A0[<ee04b38e>] mb_cache_shrink_fn+0x1e/0x100 [mbcach= e]
[337005.938435] =A0[<c016826d>] shrink_zone+0xdd/0x100
[337005.938444] =A0[<c0168d72>] try_to_free_pages+0x152/0x250
[337005.938453] =A0[<c0162fcb>] __alloc_pages+0x14b/0x390
[337005.938463] =A0[<c01855c5>] do_sync_read+0xd5/0x120
[337005.938475] =A0[<c0163247>] __get_free_pages+0x37/0x50
[337005.938483] =A0[<c0124496>] copy_process+0xa6/0x1210
[337005.938493] =A0[<c0197c34>] d_alloc+0x114/0x1a0
[337005.938503] =A0[<c0125830>] do_fork+0x40/0x260
[337005.938511] =A0[<c0210f00>] copy_to_user+0x30/0x60
[337005.938523] =A0[<c0103226>] sys_clone+0x36/0x40
[337005.938530] =A0[<c0105832>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[337005.938542] =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
[336990.803889] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [kswapd0:103]
[336990.803907]
[336990.803915] Pid: 103, comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G =A0 =A0 =A0D (2.6.24-26-= xen #1)
[336990.803922] EIP: 0061:[<c03286ea>] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0
[336990.803940] EIP is at _spin_lock+0xa/0x10
[336990.803948] EAX: c1dbc86c EBX: 00000000 ECX: 22cc3000 EDX: 00000000
[336990.803955] ESI: 57b47067 EDI: c1dbc86c EBP: 00000ff0 ESP: ed725dec
[336990.803961] =A0DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0069
[336990.803976] CR0: 8005003b CR2: b791e6d9 CR3: 23e3b000 CR4: 00000660
[336990.803986] DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
[336990.803992] DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
[336990.804001] =A0[<c01773cb>] page_check_address+0x1cb/0x3c0
[336990.804026] =A0[<c017762e>] page_referenced_one+0x6e/0x190
[336990.804039] =A0[<c017875c>] page_referenced+0xec/0x130
[336990.804049] =A0[<c01671cf>] shrink_active_list+0x18f/0x5c0
[336990.804064] =A0[<c0210556>] memmove+0x36/0x40
[336990.804079] =A0[<c0164286>] get_dirty_limits+0x16/0x200
[336990.804089] =A0[<c0139857>] call_rcu+0x97/0xa0
[336990.804102] =A0[<ee04b38e>] mb_cache_shrink_fn+0x1e/0x100 [mbcach= e]
[336990.804120] =A0[<c016826d>] shrink_zone+0xdd/0x100
[336990.804132] =A0[<c01688cc>] kswapd+0x44c/0x490
[336990.804145] =A0[<c013bb00>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[336990.804160] =A0[<c011e270>] complete+0x40/0x60
[336990.804172] =A0[<c0168480>] kswapd+0x0/0x490
[336990.804183] =A0[<c013b842>] kthread+0x42/0x70
[336990.804194] =A0[<c013b800>] kthread+0x0/0x70
[336990.804206] =A0[<c0105bb7>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[336990.804218] =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
_________________________________________= ______
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.= com
http://l= ists.xensource.com/xen-users



--
Best Regard= s,
alex.faq8@gmail.com

--000e0cd17fe4d37d8d047ea45bd9-- --===============1221572822== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1221572822==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 14:51:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:51:35 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcRap-0006RH-KV; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:51:35 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcRa2-00065k-Oh for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:50:46 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265151055-0c5b00190000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id CF9892412E5 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:50:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id VZBobmS9CQOOyCGm for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:50:56 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: simon@gottschlag.se Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so669094bwz.33 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:50:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.33.131 with SMTP id h3mr584617bkd.53.1265151053314; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:50:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <11B064048F34FD4094CBA16FC04BE2198C14864A@ex01> References: <2f88f10c1001312155h170955a3nd17eee292e8a3a0e@mail.gmail.com> <2f88f10c1002011300i187d3930t2798af23b1846797@mail.gmail.com> <11B064048F34FD4094CBA16FC04BE2198C14864A@ex01> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 23:50:52 +0100 Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts From: Simon Gottschlag To: Nathan Eisenberg X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-bw0-f211.google.com[209.85.218.211] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265151056 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21493 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1859017277==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1859017277== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000325559a921eba19047ea5efa7 --000325559a921eba19047ea5efa7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hehe, do as Nathan says, I've just heard that the bridge works as a hub, that's all ;) Greetings, Simon On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Nathan Eisenberg wrote: > >I'm no expert, but I belive the bridge works as a hub. > >Maybe you should try Open vSwitch? > >http://openvswitch.org/ > > That would be counter to what a bridge is - which is to say, a switch > (which floods on ARP-fail). > > Every time you start a VPS, the bridge's MAC address table is probably > getting flushed. It doesn't 'converge' for a period of time (once it's > learned where MAC addresses 'are') - which is probably significant at 32 > VPS's. > > That said, openvswitch is a cool project. Just wanted to be clear - the > bridge isn't a hub, it's just a switch that falls back to flooding traffic > out all interfaces when its mac-address-table is empty. > > Best Regards, > Nathan Eisenberg > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > --000325559a921eba19047ea5efa7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hehe,

do as Nathan says, I've just heard that the bridge works a= s a hub, that's all ;)

Greetings,
Simon

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us= > wrote:
>I'm no expert, but I belive the bridge works as a hub.
>Maybe you should try Open vSwitch?
>http://openvswitc= h.org/

That would be counter to what a bridge is - which is to say, a switch= (which floods on ARP-fail).

Every time you start a VPS, the bridge's MAC address table is probably = getting flushed. =A0It doesn't 'converge' for a period of time = (once it's learned where MAC addresses 'are') - which is probab= ly significant at 32 VPS's.

That said, openvswitch is a cool project. =A0Just wanted to be clear - the = bridge isn't a hub, it's just a switch that falls back to flooding = traffic out all interfaces when its mac-address-table is empty.

Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.= com
http://l= ists.xensource.com/xen-users
--000325559a921eba19047ea5efa7-- --===============1859017277== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1859017277==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 15:04:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:04:39 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcRnT-0007jb-ID; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:04:39 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcRmn-0007P1-3X for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:03:57 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265151846-0c5f002f0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 4975E241321 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f211.google.com (mail-bw0-f211.google.com [209.85.218.211]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id PnCSxgdHQNo1KAJ0 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:04:06 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jingyun.ho@gmail.com Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so677442bwz.33 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:04:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CgAO4m1hUzuAuT63JNTDQ2DFy+f8+LU+84BK1FdJA+c=; b=M080vB+21X6aYkbhxLY/dx6oHL3nCFeqRgMMjHa9BPjO/HIOCNDY0GDXyWp32bd0gv +bGC+p2CAY580BoZfeOAxAxPRrzRZWVwv8sUlbByJPPSQqgn0PL1yu7hBTDy0c8eAI1n mwkGl29R6hkvwIYS5EKqGFoVdIMUS1nEdobSQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gavIso8YdIeRFGMsUsS0X1AltCZx4Bxk/JOLjNJtNrc0j3raWz+VkqAmXqKAQ+MYf/ Up3PiOsaIo/Ew81s/MZ4WVZdIEse8vLRxID0b30fSjdmjLLD/ac3c49Fz+0F8J1zP6Tb SwX73E42/UtDqbmEg1+ol+DIZLULTDLVBVgKc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.33.196 with SMTP id i4mr930845bkd.155.1265151845359; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 15:04:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <2f88f10c1001312155h170955a3nd17eee292e8a3a0e@mail.gmail.com> <2f88f10c1002011300i187d3930t2798af23b1846797@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:04:05 +0100 Message-ID: <2f88f10c1002021504r4b8c6cddh40e85b40c630190f@mail.gmail.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts From: Jingyun He To: Simon Gottschlag Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-bw0-f211.google.com[209.85.218.211] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265151847 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21493 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com emm, Thank you, Is it possible use ebtable to filter these traffic? On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Simon Gottschlag wrot= e: > I'm no expert, but I belive the bridge works as a hub. > Maybe you should try Open vSwitch? > http://openvswitch.org/ > > Greetings, > Simon > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Jingyun He wrote: >> >> Feb =A02 04:47:03 server1 kernel: eth0: topology change detected, >> propagating >> Feb =A02 04:47:03 server1 kernel: eth0: port 32(test2) entering forwardi= ng >> state >> >> I found that the bridge will send all incoming traffic to all >> interfaces after port 32 entering forwarding state, >> And it lasts almost 20 seconds, >> >> How can I avoid this? Any help appreciated. >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Jingyun He wrote: >> > Hello, >> > I noticed that when one vps starts, it will cause the bridge send all >> > incoming traffic to every vps for a few seconds, is this normal >> > behavior? >> > >> > Thank you >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-users mailing list >> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 16:06:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:06:22 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcSlC-0003rP-IA; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:06:22 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcSkU-0003Wu-D4 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:05:38 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265155547-4340000a0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id C4C5424140B for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:05:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.28]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id kYcHmoKQkJCouZMF for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:05:48 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: mark.hurenkamp@xs4all.nl Received: from coruscant.localnet ([88.159.82.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1305ke7011340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:05:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mark.hurenkamp@xs4all.nl) From: Mark Hurenkamp To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Unable to start HVM guest on Xen-Unstable is this broken? Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 01:05:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.6mh10; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002030105.44480.mark.hurenkamp@xs4all.nl> X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp-vbr8.xs4all.nl[194.109.24.28] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265155548 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21497 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] Unable to start HVM guest on Xen-Unstable is this broken? X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi, I've recently moved my xen over from 3.4-testing to unstable, to try out 4.0, and although i got the basics working (pvm machines can boot fine), i can't seem to get hvm machines to work. When i start an hvm i get the following messages on the terminal: root@coruscant:~# xm create xp.hvm Using config file "/etc/xen/xp.hvm". Error: Domain 'xp' does not exist. This is printed on the console: (XEN) tmem: all pools frozen for all domains (XEN) tmem: all pools thawed for all domains (XEN) tmem: all pools frozen for all domains (XEN) tmem: all pools thawed for all domains (XEN) memory.c:131:d0 Could not allocate order=9 extent: id=2 memflags=0 (1 of 3) And in /var/log/xen/qemu-dm-xp i find the following messages: domid: 2 qemu: the number of cpus is 1 /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm: invalid option -- '-vcpu_avail' Initially i thought there must be something wrong with removing/overwriting the old 3.4 install, however i tried installing from scratch on a Debian Squeeze system, using the latest xen-unstable mercurial repository, and it still does not seem to want to start. When i try to execute qemu-dm from commandline, it also mentions the same error: root@coruscant:~# /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm --vcpu_avail /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm: invalid option -- '-vcpu_avail' Can anyone shed some light on this? I'm in the dark here... Is this hvm currently broken in xen-unstable? Surely there must be more people running a hvm domain on xen-unstable? Am i doing something wrong in installing Xen? Regards, Mark. P.S. My xp.hvm contains the following: kernel = '/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader' builder = 'hvm' memory = '1024' device_model='/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm' disk = [ 'phy:/dev/mirror/xp,hda,w' ] name = 'xp' vif = ['mac=aa:00:00:00:01:09, bridge=loc'] boot='c' vnc=1 vncviewer=0 vncconsole=1 sdl=0 usb=1 usbdevice='tablet' localtime=1 monitor=1 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 16:08:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:08:42 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcSnR-0004y1-Rk; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:08:41 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcSmN-0004Sj-4c for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:07:35 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265155665-45e400070000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from bay0-omc2-s13.bay0.hotmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 37FB624141B for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:07:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from bay0-omc2-s13.bay0.hotmail.com (bay0-omc2-s13.bay0.hotmail.com [65.54.190.88]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id UHsquQ6wzPjgeh9G for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 16:07:45 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: xtreme911@msn.com Received: from BAY107-W53 ([65.54.190.125]) by bay0-omc2-s13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:07:44 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [70.26.107.25] From: Mike Viau To: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: IntelVT - Xen Wiki suggestion Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:07:44 -0500 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2010 00:07:44.0731 (UTC) FILETIME=[E91012B0:01CAA464] X-Barracuda-Connect: bay0-omc2-s13.bay0.hotmail.com[65.54.190.88] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265155665 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21497 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Subject: [Xen-users] IntelVT - Xen Wiki suggestion X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0857712644==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============0857712644== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_aacb9807-c475-477c-9771-21ed7b369efd_" --_aacb9807-c475-477c-9771-21ed7b369efd_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello=2C=20 I believe that adding the Intel Virtualization Technology List to the Intel= VT - Xen Wiki page at: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/IntelVT would be a good idea. The Intel=AE Virtualization Technology List can be found at: http://ark.intel.com/VTList.aspx The list can be used to identify processors with the VT technology. IntelVT - Xen Wiki page is linked to on the HVM Compatible Processors page = as well at: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors =20 -M =20 _________________________________________________________________ --_aacb9807-c475-477c-9771-21ed7b369efd_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello=2C

I believe that adding the Intel Virtualization Technology = List to the IntelVT - Xen Wiki page at:

http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/IntelVT
=
would be a good idea.


The Intel=AE Virtualization Technology= List can be found at:

= http://ark.intel.com/VTList.aspx

The list can be used to identif= y processors with the VT technology.


IntelVT - Xen Wiki page is = linked to on the HVM Compatible Processors page as well at:

http://wik= i.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors


 =3B -M



Not using Hotmail on your phone? Why = not? = Get it now. = --_aacb9807-c475-477c-9771-21ed7b369efd_-- --===============0857712644== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0857712644==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 18:53:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:53:31 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcVMw-00022p-Ss; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:53:30 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcVMA-0001iO-84 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:52:42 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265165572-1a3500490000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from zimbra.twc-inc.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 7A222241576 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:52:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from zimbra.twc-inc.net (h-66-166-193-235.nycmny83.static.covad.net [66.166.193.235]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id vvYe6Oh5uIWpjM6x for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:52:52 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: dana@twc-inc.net Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.twc-inc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA6065B0A for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:53:05 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.twc-inc.net Received: from zimbra.twc-inc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.twc-inc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DZhr8NhB4FCE for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:53:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.17.115] (h-66-166-193-226.nycmny83.static.covad.net [66.166.193.226]) by zimbra.twc-inc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567A165B01 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:53:02 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] BUG: soft lockup Subject: Re: [Xen-users] BUG: soft lockup From: Dana Rawding In-Reply-To: <20100201072727.GR2861@reaktio.net> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:52:48 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <695200da1001280330r6720970ay8551dd709969d50e@mail.gmail.com> <90eb1dc71001280651y772899c7h6049ab7763c33aed@mail.gmail.com> <695200da1001281419v7c1f3ff7sa860ef2c05223ab2@mail.gmail.com> <695200da1001290157g5c481fc4ua3885f71ef7a1051@mail.gmail.com> <20100201072727.GR2861@reaktio.net> To: Xen List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) X-Barracuda-Connect: h-66-166-193-235.nycmny83.static.covad.net[66.166.193.235] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265165572 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21509 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Feb 1, 2010, at 2:27 AM, Pasi K=E4rkk=E4inen wrote: > Please check this wiki page: > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenBestPractices I have1.5 GB RAM dedicated to the dom0's. It's probably more RAM than = necessary. Is there a suggestion as to what this number should be? =20 The sched-credit was the default 256. I have upped it to 512 per the = best practices and Alex's suggestion. I'm hoping this calms things = down. If not I plan to try a different kernel. =20 Thanks to everyone for the suggestions. Dana= _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Tue Feb 02 21:58:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:58:23 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcYFq-0007tm-Bf; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:58:22 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcYEd-0007Yc-HC for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:57:07 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265176636-150b00130000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail.gmx.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with SMTP id 945752400DF for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:57:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by spam.xensource.com with SMTP id dA3mP2dIeAUaSIGm for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:57:17 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: punamix@gmx.de Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 03 Feb 2010 05:57:14 -0000 Received: from xdsl-87-79-169-123.netcologne.de (EHLO localhost) [87.79.169.123] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 03 Feb 2010 06:57:14 +0100 X-Authenticated: #48702715 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+JqJlY4TiJDMCfkiUfBM9iw6HVzVb44Xr02qwa1u doNEOqsjqzM+Ng Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:53:06 +0100 From: Punami To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Newbie question - Starting a VM Message-ID: <20100203065306.63835857@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.12.12; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.77000000000000002 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail.gmx.net[213.165.64.20] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265176637 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21520 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] Newbie question - Starting a VM X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi, I installed XCP on my server and installed a Debian-VM like it is described here: http://www.xen.org/files/XenCloud/guest.pdf But how do I access the guest console / graphical installer? Thanks a lot. Burghard _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 00:12:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:12:13 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcaLM-0002V7-Qw; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:12:12 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcaKb-00029z-BH for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:11:25 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265184694-65cc001c0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 6BB602405A8 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 00:11:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [81.174.135.208]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id HzJ0msCq15UaCTuA for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:11:34 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: linux@thehobsons.co.uk Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5390C23C100 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:11:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from patsy.thehobsons.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (patsy.thehobsons.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xJuZzG9d60EI for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:11:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from simon.thehobsons.co.uk (simons-macbookpro.thehobsons.co.uk [192.168.0.202]) by patsy.thehobsons.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C18823C0F3 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:11:31 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <2f88f10c1002021504r4b8c6cddh40e85b40c630190f@mail.gmail.com> References: <2f88f10c1001312155h170955a3nd17eee292e8a3a0e@mail.gmail.com> <2f88f10c1002011300i187d3930t2798af23b1846797@mail.gmail.com> <2f88f10c1002021504r4b8c6cddh40e85b40c630190f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:11:18 +0000 To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com From: Simon Hobson X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: the bridge send all traffic to every vps when one vps starts Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Barracuda-Connect: patsy.thehobsons.co.uk[81.174.135.208] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265184695 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.20 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.20 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=BSF_SC0_SA074b X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21528 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.20 BSF_SC0_SA074b Custom Rule SA074b X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Jingyun He wrote: >Is it possible use ebtable to filter these traffic? Why ? Every ethernet network works the same way, at some point, machines will receive traffic that isn't destined for them - and in the original arrangement before switches, this was the norm. The protocol stack will filter it out. In terms of security, yes someone could pick up traffic they shouldn't see - but just how often does this happen ? Someone would have to be very lucky to be looking for traffic AND an interface changing state triggers the effect AND the traffic is interesting - all at the same time. You probably could use ebtables (or would it be iptables ?) to block any guest from seeing traffic that isn't for it. You'd need a script to reconfigure the rules every time an interface comes up (and possibly goes down). -- Simon Hobson WANTED: "Software CD ROM Kit" for Canon CLBP 360-PS printer (Canon part no RH6-3612, or possibly RH6-3810, or RH6-3610 might do). I've a dead HD and need this CD so I can replace the disk and re-install the printer OS on it. If anyone knows where I might get hold of one I'd be grateful - requests to Canon drew a blank, it's been out of support for years. Alternatively, if anyone has one of these and would let me image their hard disk ... Visit http://www.magpiesnestpublishing.co.uk/ for books by acclaimed author Gladys Hobson. Novels - poetry - short stories - ideal as Christmas stocking fillers. Some available as e-books. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 03:01:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:01:45 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcczR-0002T5-8R; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:01:45 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nccyc-00028U-Uh for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:00:55 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265194863-46f1003c0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail2.ayudahosting.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 49F9D2418E6 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 03:01:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.ayudahosting.com.au (mail2.ayudahosting.com.au [116.240.207.12]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id C5lNGEz6xcm3kCCW (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:01:04 X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: bplant@iinet.net.au Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ayudahosting.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D853B3 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:01:02 +1100 (EST) Received: from daedalus (124-168-98-224.dyn.iinet.net.au [124.168.98.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ayudahosting.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E686AB2 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:01:01 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:00:57 +1100 From: Brad Plant To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: pvops netconsole Message-ID: <20100203220057.64fe94b4@daedalus> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.18.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: mail2.ayudahosting.com.au[116.240.207.12] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265194865 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21537 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] pvops netconsole X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1319721277==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============1319721277== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/V/M8.P1dH6.eeVucdoiSPw6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --Sig_/V/M8.P1dH6.eeVucdoiSPw6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Is netconsole supposed to work under pvops? When I try to enable it I get t= he following: Initialising Xen virtual ethernet driver. blkfront: xvda1: barriers enabled netconsole: local port 11111 netconsole: local IP 10.20.40.2 netconsole: interface eth1 netconsole: remote port 9514 netconsole: remote IP 10.20.50.2 netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:16:3e:00:50:02 netconsole: eth1 doesn't support polling, aborting. netconsole: cleaning up Cheers, Brad --Sig_/V/M8.P1dH6.eeVucdoiSPw6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktpV2kACgkQtFxK98yAy+kdFwCcDP0KTOLUXtjEOWsFZ5HJGczU 36kAmwYeMLN+PuQMhWIOYGdD8iX7spcI =nhw/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/V/M8.P1dH6.eeVucdoiSPw6-- --===============1319721277== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1319721277==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 05:22:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:22:15 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcfBO-0000Aa-Ps; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:22:14 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcfAi-0008HP-4Q for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:21:32 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265203302-37a5000a0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 69E14241B5E for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 05:21:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id WU46mTn0AeIYEmnL for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:21:42 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jep@obrien-pifer.com X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ePCqpULPsIgA:10 a=AxrFYW75ytYbR_LrNykA:9 a=YeReCK4ATlU7cpcWnXxLAVkRUioA:4 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 96.10.171.230 Received: from [96.10.171.230] ([96.10.171.230:16713] helo=mailserver.obrien-pifer.com) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 59/D1-11092-568796B4; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:21:41 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.22] ([192.168.1.22]) by mailserver.obrien-pifer.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o13DLfIw032373 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 08:21:41 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: XCP shared storage with xiotech san From: James Pifer To: Xen List Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:22:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1265206940.28828.23.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com[75.180.132.120] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265203302 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21545 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: [Xen-users] XCP shared storage with xiotech san X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Due to instability of my SLES xen servers (SLES10SP2 and SLES11) I feel I need to look at some other options. The time is right to look at other options because I have a server available and storage available on our SAN. Currently there's a vdisk created on our SAN (Xiotech) that is assigned to each xen server. Each xen server has ocfs2 installed and shares this vdisk using ocfs2. Right or wrong, our systems are all file based, growable storage which seems to work fine and performance doesn't appear to be an issue. I'm thinking about trying XCP. Since XCP does not support ocfs2 yet, how would I setup a similar environment using xcp? I'm looking at the Administration Guide on shared storage, but I'm no expert on storage technologies, so some suggestions would be appreciated. Suggestions are appreciated. Thanks, James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 06:04:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:04:29 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcfqH-0001bU-Gv; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:04:29 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcfpY-0001Gc-9D for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:03:44 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265205833-3d1f004b0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail.cvtisr.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id EC3A424194D for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:03:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cvtisr.sk (virgo.cvtisr.sk [193.87.7.3]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id LlqjPiCHVJAjApCJ for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:03:53 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: zary@cvtisr.sk Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cvtisr.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B7C19C001 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:51:42 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cvtisr.sk Received: from mail.cvtisr.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.cvtisr.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Au7uCXEaaimR for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:51:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from aries.space.cvtisr.sk (unknown [192.168.1.51]) by mail.cvtisr.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827AADC00A for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 14:51:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from Aries.space.cvtisr.sk ([::1]) by aries.space.cvtisr.sk ([::1]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:02:56 +0100 From: Matej Zary To: "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:02:55 +0100 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] XCP shared storage with xiotech san Subject: RE: [Xen-users] XCP shared storage with xiotech san Thread-Topic: [Xen-users] XCP shared storage with xiotech san Thread-Index: Acqk0+eEqIlHwmacTny6He8ZBqigWgAAxQrA Message-ID: <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA16924E2B67@aries.space.cvtisr.sk> References: <1265206940.28828.23.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> In-Reply-To: <1265206940.28828.23.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: sk-SK X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: virgo.cvtisr.sk[193.87.7.3] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265205833 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21546 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com NFS could be solution. It's easy to setup, VM disks are still vhd files. T= he NFS export from storage can be attached (mounted) on every Xen server an= d it looks like smb share. Directory and vhd files in it. :) Performance wise, it depends on a lot of factors. But it migh work - at wor= st, it should be easy to try. :) Matej -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists= .xensource.com] On Behalf Of James Pifer Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:22 PM To: Xen List Subject: [Xen-users] XCP shared storage with xiotech san Due to instability of my SLES xen servers (SLES10SP2 and SLES11) I feel I need to look at some other options. The time is right to look at other options because I have a server available and storage available on our SAN.=20 Currently there's a vdisk created on our SAN (Xiotech) that is assigned to each xen server. Each xen server has ocfs2 installed and shares this vdisk using ocfs2. Right or wrong, our systems are all file based, growable storage which seems to work fine and performance doesn't appear to be an issue. I'm thinking about trying XCP. Since XCP does not support ocfs2 yet, how would I setup a similar environment using xcp? I'm looking at the Administration Guide on shared storage, but I'm no expert on storage technologies, so some suggestions would be appreciated. =20 Suggestions are appreciated.=20 Thanks, James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 06:55:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:55:51 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ncgdy-0003f5-QH; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:55:50 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcgdA-0003KU-OF for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:55:00 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265208909-70f400030000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 45BB0241B1B for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 06:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id iFXmjOYNjmiqdAIF for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:55:09 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: stephen.spector@citrix.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,399,1262581200"; d="scan'208,217";a="7059794" Received: from ftlpmailmx01.citrite.net ([10.9.154.223]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2010 09:55:09 -0500 Received: from FTLPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.13.98.208]) by FTLPMAILMX01.citrite.net ([10.9.154.223]) with mapi; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:55:09 -0500 From: Stephen Spector To: 'Mike Viau' , "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:55:09 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] IntelVT - Xen Wiki suggestion Subject: RE: [Xen-users] IntelVT - Xen Wiki suggestion Thread-Topic: [Xen-users] IntelVT - Xen Wiki suggestion Thread-Index: AcqkZRMFSds+NX1dRgiImBtrLKq7VwAe8Yjw Message-ID: <652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E58@FTLPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp.citrix.com[66.165.176.89] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265208910 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21550 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0087164584==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com --===============0087164584== Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E58FTLPMAILBOX01_" --_000_652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E58FTLPMAILBOX01_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks. I will update the site this morning. Stephen Spector Xen.org Community Manager T: (772) 621-5062 | F: (772) 365-0338 | M: (954) 854-4257 stephen.spector@xen.org http://blog.xen.org | @xen_com_mgr From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists= .xensource.com] On Behalf Of Mike Viau Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 7:08 PM To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Subject: [Xen-users] IntelVT - Xen Wiki suggestion Hello, I believe that adding the Intel Virtualization Technology List to the Intel= VT - Xen Wiki page at: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/IntelVT would be a good idea. The Intel(r) Virtualization Technology List can be found at: http://ark.intel.com/VTList.aspx The list can be used to identify processors with the VT technology. IntelVT - Xen Wiki page is linked to on the HVM Compatible Processors page = as well at: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors -M ________________________________ Not using Hotmail on your phone? Why not? Get it now. --_000_652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E58FTLPMAILBOX01_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks. I will update the site this morning.

 

 

Stephen Spector

 

Xen.org Community Manager

T: (772) 621-5062 | F: (772) 365-0338 | M: (954) 854-4257

stephen.spector@xen.org

http://blog.xen.org | @xen_com_mgr

 

 

 

From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xenso= urce.com] On Behalf Of Mike Viau
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 7:08 PM
To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com
Subject: [Xen-users] IntelVT - Xen Wiki suggestion=

 

Hello,

I believe that adding the Intel Virtualization Technology List to the Intel= VT - Xen Wiki page at:

http://wiki.xensource= .com/xenwiki/IntelVT

would be a good idea.


The Intel® Virtualization Technology List can be found at:

http://ark.intel.com/VTList.as= px

The list can be used to identify processors with the VT technology.


IntelVT - Xen Wiki page is linked to on the HVM Compatible Processors page = as well at:

htt= p://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HVM_Compatible_Processors


 
-M


Not using Hotmail on your phone? Why not? Get it n= ow.

--_000_652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726C8E7E58FTLPMAILBOX01_-- --===============0087164584== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============0087164584==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 07:16:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:16:47 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcgyF-0004mg-5t; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:16:47 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcgxL-0004Ql-48 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:15:51 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265210158-6dbb00330000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 40764241AE3; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:15:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from svdomino.grelier.com (reverse.grelier.com [79.174.213.138]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id bOHFryLApLFvFU92; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:15:58 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: R.BERNIER@grelier.com In-Reply-To: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 August 18, 2005 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_BERNIER?= Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:15:58 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on svdomino/grelier(Release 6.5.1|January 21, 2004) at 03/02/2010 16:15:59, Serialize complete at 03/02/2010 16:15:59 X-Barracuda-Connect: reverse.grelier.com[79.174.213.138] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265210160 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21551 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Cc: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com, James Harper , xen-users@lists.xensource.com, Nick Couchman X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1639046314==" Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --===============1639046314== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0053DD20C12576BF_=" Message en plusieurs parties au format MIME --=_alternative 0053DD20C12576BF_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For information, after hide the controller scsi and add it in my guest=20 win2k3 as said Thomas, the tape drive works !! Thanks !! >James,=20 >I have restore my guest win2k3 without drivers, and after install your=20 last GPLPV I have a new driver in Controller SCSI and RAID: Xen SCSI=20 Driver and I have a new Tape device with a yellow exclamation point.=20 >I must install the tape driver for win2k3 or not ?=20 >If I don't install it, windows not detect a Tape device...=20 >Thanks in advance.=20 >R=E9mi=20 >Hi James and thanks for your reply,=20 >Yes I use scsi passthrough, I have attach my tape with the command:=20 ># xm scsi-attach 3 6:0:6:0 6:0:6:0=20 >But after my guest win2k3 detected a new tape device (Quantum LTO 2) and=20 here I have install the driver for Windows... Maybe it's the problem !=20 >I try to change the driver with your driver gplpv xenscsi but Windows=20 don't want !!!! grrr=20 >R=E9mi=20 >I use scsi passthrough with my gplpv drivers regularly to give Windows=20 access to a physical tape drive. Is that what you are trying to do? >James > -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of R=E9mi BERNIER > Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:33 > To: Nick Couchman > Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com; xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3 >=20 >=20 > Hi Nick and thanks for your reply, >=20 > I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi=20 tape, I > have this error: >=20 > # xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0 > Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-devname: None: argument 3 must be=20 string or > read-only buffer, not None >=20 > and I have nothing in "xm scsi-list 1" >=20 > I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0: > # lsscsi > [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 - >=20 > With st module: > # lsscsi > [7:0:6:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1914 /dev/st0 >=20 > If you have an other idea.. > Thanks in advance, >=20 > I will test to hide the scsi-controller at the boot.of my dom0: > pciback.hide=3D(...) >=20 > R=E9mi >=20 >=20 >=20 > >Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st). This should insure > >that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all. >=20 > >-Nick >=20 > >>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER wrote: >=20 > >> Hi Everybody, > > > > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with >=20 > > BackupExec on my guest win2k3. > > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in > use... > > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with > the > > command "mt" on dom0... > > > > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub > have > > no impact : > > module /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro > > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0) > > > > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !! > > > > Thanks for your answer in advance. > > > > R=E9mi > > > > Conf: > > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits) >=20 >=20 >=20 > -------- > This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the=20 sole use > of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or=20 you are > not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended=20 recipient, > please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) > Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly > prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise=20 using > this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have=20 received > this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this=20 e-mail > and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this > message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither=20 endorsed by > nor attributable to SEAKR. > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users=20 =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --=_alternative 0053DD20C12576BF_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For information, after hide the cont= roller scsi and add it in my guest win2k3 as said Thomas, the tape drive works !! Thanks !!


>James,

>I have restore my guest win2k3 without drivers, and after install your last GPLPV I have a new driver in Controller SCSI and RAID: Xen SCSI Driver and I have a new Tape device with a yellow exclamation point.
>I must install the tape driver for win2k3 or not ?
>If I don't install it, windows not detect a Tape device...

>Thanks in advance.

>R=E9mi =




>Hi James and thanks for your reply,

>Yes I use scsi passthrough, I have attach my tape with the command:
># xm scsi-attach 3 6:0:6:0 6:0:6:0

>But after my guest win2k3 detected a new tape device (Quantum LTO 2) and here I have install the driver for Windows... Maybe it's the problem !
>I try to change the driver with your driver gplpv xenscsi but Windows don't want !!!! grrr

>R=E9mi =





>I use scsi passthrough with my gplpv drivers regularly to give Windows access to a physical tape drive. Is that what you are trying to do?

>James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-
> bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of R=E9mi BERNIER
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 February 2010 19:33
> To: Nick Couchman
> Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com; xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.c= om
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Manage tape on guest win2k3
>
>
> Hi Nick and thanks for your reply,
>
> I just test the removing st module, but when i want attach the scsi tape, I
> have this error:
>
> # xm scsi-attach 1 7:0:6:0 7:0:6:0
> Error: Writing vscsi-devs/dev-0/p-devname: None: argument 3 must be string or
> read-only buffer, not None
>
> and I have nothing in "xm scsi-list 1"
>
> I thinks it's because now i haven't the /dev/st0:
> # lsscsi
> [7:0:6:0]    tape    CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2        1914  -
>
> With st module:
> # lsscsi
> [7:0:6:0]    tape    CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2        1914  /dev/st0
>
> If you have an other idea..
> Thanks in advance,
>
> I will test to hide the scsi-controller at the boot.of my dom0:
> pciback.hide=3D(...)
>
> R=E9mi
>
>
>
> >Try removing the st module from dom0 (rmmod st).  This should insure
> >that dom0 is not using the tape drive at all.
>
> >-Nick
>
> >>>> On 2010/02/01 at 01:04, R=E9mi BERNIER<R.BERNIER@g= relier.com> wrote:
>
> >> Hi Everybody,
> >
> > I have a problem with my magnetic tape drive, I control the tape with
>
> > BackupExec on my guest win2k3.
> > BackupExec see it right my tape drive but for him the tape is in
> use...
> > I think it's my dom0 use it, because i can pilot the tape drive with
> the
> > command "mt" on dom0...
> >
> > So for me i need to hide the tape to boot ... but this line in grub
> have
> > no impact :
> > module         /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18.8-xen-amd= 64 root=3D/dev/sda1 ro
> > console=3Dtty0 scsiback.permissive scsiback.hide=3D(6:0:6:0)
> >
> > If you have an idea on this subject, I listen you !!
> >
> > Thanks for your answer in advance.
> >
> > R=E9mi
> >
> > Conf:
> > Debian lenny, kernel 2.6.18-8x86=5F64-xen, xen 3.4.2 (xenbits)
>
>
>
> --------
> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use
> of the intended recipient.  If this email is not intended for you, or you are
> not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recip= ient,
> please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR)
> Privileged/Proprietary Information.  In such a case, you are strictly
> prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using
> this message, its contents or attachments in any way.  If you have received
> this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail
> and delete the message from your mailbox.  Information contained in this
> message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endor= sed by
> nor attributable to SEAKR.
> =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users = =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
--=_alternative 0053DD20C12576BF_=-- --===============1639046314== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users --===============1639046314==-- From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 07:49:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:49:02 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NchTS-00068v-Bn; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:49:02 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NchSg-0005mK-5m for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:48:14 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265212103-119100050000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 0FAA2241B3A for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:48:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id 28ArqCQ3ioShDpRv for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 07:48:23 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jep@obrien-pifer.com X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=-VvjpS2xBBEA:10 a=DQp_iPMLkLJBMJWB5VcA:9 a=gteO-YzYzA5UEbK-WHLn8blYFJwA:4 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 96.10.171.230 Received: from [96.10.171.230] ([96.10.171.230:17894] helo=mailserver.obrien-pifer.com) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id DE/90-05033-7CA996B4; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:48:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.22] ([192.168.1.22]) by mailserver.obrien-pifer.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o13FmMnq001361 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:48:22 -0500 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [Xen-users] XCP shared storage with xiotech san Subject: RE: [Xen-users] XCP shared storage with xiotech san From: James Pifer To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com In-Reply-To: <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA16924E2B67@aries.space.cvtisr.sk> References: <1265206940.28828.23.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> <5DB0519124BB3D4DBEEB14426D4AC7EA16924E2B67@aries.space.cvtisr.sk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:49:01 -0500 Message-Id: <1265215741.28828.27.camel@storage.obrien-pifer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com[75.180.132.120] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265212104 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21553 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 15:02 +0100, Matej Zary wrote: > NFS could be solution. It's easy to setup, VM disks are still vhd files. The NFS export from storage can be attached (mounted) on every Xen server and it looks like smb share. Directory and vhd files in it. :) > Performance wise, it depends on a lot of factors. But it migh work - at worst, it should be easy to try. :) > > Matej Hi Matei. Thanks for responding. Besides possible performance issues, my biggest issue with NFS is that it would be a single point of failure. One server would be running NFS and the others would mount NFS from it, correct? So if the NFS server went down for any reason, so do all the VMs. It would be easy to try as far as testing XCP though. :-) Thanks, James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 10:39:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:39:45 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nck8e-0001yu-QM; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:39:44 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nck7u-0001eJ-Pz for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:38:58 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265222348-5dc2004a0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from ydin.reaktio.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id 204CF241DA8 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:39:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ydin.reaktio.net (reaktio.net [194.89.68.22]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id Du9OXpvhayN29Zev for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:39:08 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: pasik@iki.fi Received: by ydin.reaktio.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 589DB20058; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:39:10 +0200 (EET) Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:39:10 +0200 From: Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?= To: Mark Hurenkamp X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Unable to start HVM guest on Xen-Unstable is this broken? Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Unable to start HVM guest on Xen-Unstable is this broken? Message-ID: <20100203183910.GL2861@reaktio.net> References: <201002030105.44480.mark.hurenkamp@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201002030105.44480.mark.hurenkamp@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Barracuda-Connect: reaktio.net[194.89.68.22] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265222349 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21563 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:05:44AM +0100, Mark Hurenkamp wrote: > Hi, > > > I've recently moved my xen over from 3.4-testing to unstable, to try out 4.0, > and although i got the basics working (pvm machines can boot fine), i can't > seem to get hvm machines to work. > > When i start an hvm i get the following messages on the terminal: > root@coruscant:~# xm create xp.hvm > Using config file "/etc/xen/xp.hvm". > Error: Domain 'xp' does not exist. > > This is printed on the console: > (XEN) tmem: all pools frozen for all domains > (XEN) tmem: all pools thawed for all domains > (XEN) tmem: all pools frozen for all domains > (XEN) tmem: all pools thawed for all domains > (XEN) memory.c:131:d0 Could not allocate order=9 extent: id=2 memflags=0 (1 of > 3) > > And in /var/log/xen/qemu-dm-xp i find the following messages: > domid: 2 > qemu: the number of cpus is 1 > /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm: invalid option -- '-vcpu_avail' > How about "xm log" ? > Initially i thought there must be something wrong with removing/overwriting > the old 3.4 install, however i tried installing from scratch on a Debian > Squeeze system, using the latest xen-unstable mercurial repository, and it > still does not seem to want to start. > > When i try to execute qemu-dm from commandline, it also mentions the same > error: > root@coruscant:~# /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm --vcpu_avail > /usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm: invalid option -- '-vcpu_avail' > > Can anyone shed some light on this? I'm in the dark here... > Is this hvm currently broken in xen-unstable? Surely there must be more people > running a hvm domain on xen-unstable? Am i doing something wrong in installing > Xen? > > > > P.S. > My xp.hvm contains the following: > kernel = '/usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader' > builder = 'hvm' > memory = '1024' > device_model='/usr/lib/xen/bin/qemu-dm' > disk = [ 'phy:/dev/mirror/xp,hda,w' ] > name = 'xp' > vif = ['mac=aa:00:00:00:01:09, bridge=loc'] > boot='c' > vnc=1 > vncviewer=0 > vncconsole=1 > sdl=0 > usb=1 > usbdevice='tablet' > localtime=1 > monitor=1 > So you're missing vcpus=1 option? -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 11:20:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:20:32 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nckm8-0007g7-0k; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:20:32 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NcklQ-0007Kb-D5 for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:19:48 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265224797-0d39001b0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id A52CD241E31 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:19:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by spam.xensource.com with ESMTP id vDtFGzV7rNJrA2sp for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:19:57 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: mark.hurenkamp@xs4all.nl Received: from ws2.karpeer.net (173-82-ftth.onsneteindhoven.nl [88.159.82.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o13JJuFQ097601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:19:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mark.hurenkamp@xs4all.nl) Message-Id: <80A78F9A-6003-45F2-911F-CC0919FD9E80@xs4all.nl> From: Mark Hurenkamp To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com In-Reply-To: <20100203183910.GL2861@reaktio.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [Xen-users] Unable to start HVM guest on Xen-Unstable is this broken? [SOLVED] Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Unable to start HVM guest on Xen-Unstable is this broken? [SOLVED] Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:19:55 +0100 References: <201002030105.44480.mark.hurenkamp@xs4all.nl> <20100203183910.GL2861@reaktio.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl[194.109.24.33] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1265224798 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall at xensource.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=6.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.21567 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: xen-users@lists.xensource.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen user discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Hi, Pasi, thanks for your suggestions, meanwhile i've finally managed to solve my problem this evening. To summarize, i took the following steps (on Ubuntu Karmic), to get a working hvm back: 1) Delete /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages and /usr/lib/ python2.6/site-packages 2) Remove all xen tools from /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages and /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages 3) Create symlinks from the site-packages to dist-packages in /usr/ local/lib/python2.6 and /usr/lib/python2.6 4) Remove the entire xen-unstable.hg tree 5) Run make install-tools install-xen install-stubdom 6) Reboot I hope this can save someone some time recovering from a similar situation. Mark. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users From xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com Wed Feb 03 11:33:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: www-data@lists.xensource.com Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:33:46 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.colo.xensource.com) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nckyw-0000gw-Jx; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:33:46 -0800 Received: from spam.xensource.com ([70.42.241.90]) by lists.xensource.com with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ncky6-0000Ik-Du for xen-users@lists.xensource.com; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:32:54 -0800 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1265225583-0d37002a0000-xM1yvO X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.xensource.com:8000/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.xensource.com (Spam &