Re: [Xen-devel][Xense-devel][PATCH][3/4] Xen Security Modules: t

To:	"Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel][Xense-devel][PATCH][3/4] Xen Security Modules: tools
From:	"George S. Coker, II" <george.coker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 06:23:32 -0400
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "George S. Coker, II" <gscoker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xense-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Tue, 08 May 2007 03:21:58 -0700
Dkim-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e5M6ZZ4WQbK4wzgp9fWxLNZFF7Yw7ntSMc6/6eMAKTLduMf5TuAqJeohy/sEuNhlNjtOrg+XhZ/zFYYDE0j7mZJuZ+t/smWXJyqWVFj/K/3Z5Cc4/6LQ0v71D7odD/aF0Fb204eTw1fVDP0n07mFvJXFwmso7B2SqoSGWn19C+c=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UJKGXIRvMF/RhDUKVFE22lVscXeT/FyOYAW770w2kVeIb58ThPwONuQY1/wLq2/GIttLQlrAzR14QhdoBNbcViu7Ve+L8e65AynTwmod+U7AngT6e2h4FZrDzLjjULy903xzMvQ0nNQm2+Gifi+aBuzxMMpZtjZHGHqDjEnlF/Q=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200705081040.23581.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<C265E1E1.6F8A%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200705081040.23581.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I'll reformat the patches.

On 5/8/07, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> There are two styles we properly support: Xen style as in files like
> event_channel.c, xmalloc.c, etc.; and Linux style (generally seen in files
> ripped off fairly directly from Linux -- *not* used in new files). The
> halfway-house files usually arise from me having been too lazy to enforce
> Xen style when they were checked in, and generally being in bits of the
> tree where I don't often venture.

I did wonder if it was something like that ;-)

> Seeing as we're planning to be more strict from now on, the current ACM
> code style is *not* to be followed.

Cool, thanks for the clarification.  I'll continue running the verifier over
new patches and I can submit it for inclusion in 3.0.6 - once I've finished
teaching it the difference between Xen and Linux.  Then folks will be able to
run it over submitted code as a sanity test.

Cheers,
Mark

--
Dave: Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat?  And no pedals!
Mark: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
Dave: Skateboards have wheels.
Mark: My wheel has a wheel!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

xense-devel

Re: [Xen-devel][Xense-devel][PATCH][3/4] Xen Security Modules: tools