Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux

To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] State of Xen in upstream Linux
From: "Grant McWilliams" <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:07:26 -0700
Cc: Alexey Eremenko <al4321@xxxxxxxxx>, Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:08:08 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=VNtA8xfZiMVkZq+9IzGUpiNiRDkGvw/0JtQUWLfZmSA=; b=xWCW6L/pEJLtZhQ+eTqwP6X42l/5+BJ1qFLgHpKV0p8RZuuqhR3l+Xx1DC9Ccsxa1J D+aeQBTBTV/Dhfx9/rW7AMoRNAI6i3gn7x2s8tcMc3+1Eb1qmPChn4zTJjfpB9pruKUB LG0TpKGKIEm+Q3XNlgRNoa5QoDVWvh9wCATMk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=SvQRYVte1/22Z8BKCQ+67hom1xy5dH7srIDeV/9o1Zk5eWajwiaz3uIKyMA0NZMjJ2 I/WFz/4JxSHsvk+51DbGkZtwsPPWllFbI5u3HRnp9VZbbwUjdjFiJHZTGIxAKK2Gw7z1 OnotkVeT52PUmKP46k0Sj3meKa3heJe97K+oI=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48920B4F.7010608@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <48910C99.10606@xxxxxxxx> <20080731090845.GH23888@xxxxxxxxxx> <ed123fa30807311054p4965f43bod78dafa6626c9c2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4891FFBA.1020702@xxxxxxxx> <7fac565a0807311119p55e534f1hc15005aea46671a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48920455.40204@xxxxxxxx> <ed123fa30807311148q6460d2d8nb012f1b4edeb042f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48920B4F.7010608@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Grant McWilliams wrote:
> Vbox OSE has full source available. I was working on a contract for a
> corporation and was in the stage
> of deciding which virtualization platform to run and installed Vbox in
> a Xen system (running Xen). The installer
> loaded the vbox driver (As well as set it up to load automatically)
> and sent the server into a continuous reboot. Unfortunately this was
> in a Datacenter that I had no physical access to. The Vbox developers
> jumped all over me when I suggested that it was a bug.
> When running Xen the VMware interface will come up and the driver will
> load but the VMs just don't start. It seems like
> that would be a much better situation than causing the entire machine
> to crash. Seems like a Vbox problem. It was run in Dom0.

Yes, that sounds like an inherently unstable configuration.  I don't
know anything about how VBox operates internally, but whatever pagetable
management scheme they're using will quite likely not work under Xen
without a lot of care.  The best we can do in that case is try to make
sure that VBox doesn't attempt to come up.

If they don't rely on VT/SVM, then it may work from within a Xen hvm
domain, but I don't know what benefit that would have.  What were you
trying to achieve by running VBox in dom0?

   J

I wasn't really trying to run VBox in the dom0. I'd been running the Xen kernel so long that I'd forgotten which
kernel I was on. Like I said when you start VMware the guest OS just doesn't run which gives you a second
to ponder why. VBox uses VT/SVM if you check a box in the config. It was not checked when it
crashed the server.

Depending on the application I use VBox or Xen for virtualization projects. VBox acts as an HVM most of the time
so it's great for those times I'm virtualizing a product that I have no control over. Xen is best for environments
that I do have control over.

Grant McWilliams
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users