Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-users] windows 2003 hvm performance on xen 3.0.3 and xen 3.0.4

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] windows 2003 hvm performance on xen 3.0.3 and xen 3.0.4
From: Digilab <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:42:27 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 03:01:45 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
Hi,
i'm testing windows 2003 on xen/hvm and today i installed xen 3.0.4.
I used the old image disk of win2003 and it started without problem, i see then that even if xen 3.0.4 support apci/pae/acpi/smp cpu on windows, my old installation was for 1 standard pc with no smp/apic support. So i installed from scratch win 2003 on xen 3.0.4 and at the end i got 2 cpu just putting vcpu=2. I started to notice (with xentop) that the windows 2003 with smp enabled, consume much more cpu then the single cpu win 2003 and i notice also that win2003 installed from scratch on xen 3.0.4 for smp support had bad persormance. While win2003 uniprocessor standard pc version is very fast, the newer smp/2cpu had bad performance. why? i thinked/hoped to had improve performance from a windows2003 smp/2cpu but isn't so...
Some suggest?

Regards,
@lessandro Marzini
DIGILAB

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>