Re: [Xen-users] Swap File

["Dave Smif" <systemsconsultant@xxxxxxxxx>]

Exactly. It really makes sense to me to sort!

dave@linuxdev:/dev$ ls -la loop*
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  0 1996-06-04 02:47 loop0
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  1 1996-06-04 02:47 loop1
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 10 2002-03-20 01:13 loop10
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 11 2002-03-20 01:13 loop11
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 12 2002-03-20 01:13 loop12
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 13 2002-03-20 01:13 loop13
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 14 2002-03-20 01:13 loop14
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 15 2002-03-20 01:13 loop15
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  2 1996-06-04 02:47 loop2
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  3 1996-06-04 02:47 loop3
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  4 1996-06-04 02:47 loop4
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  5 1996-06-04 02:47 loop5
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  6 1996-06-04 02:47 loop6
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  7 1996-06-04 02:47 loop7
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  8 1996-06-04 02:48 loop8
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  9 2002-03-20 01:13 loop9

dave@linuxdev:/dev$ ls -la loop* | sort
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  0 1996-06-04 02:47 loop0
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  1 1996-06-04 02:47 loop1
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  2 1996-06-04 02:47 loop2
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  3 1996-06-04 02:47 loop3
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  4 1996-06-04 02:47 loop4
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  5 1996-06-04 02:47 loop5
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  6 1996-06-04 02:47 loop6
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  7 1996-06-04 02:47 loop7
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  8 1996-06-04 02:48 loop8
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7,  9 2002-03-20 01:13 loop9
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 10 2002-03-20 01:13 loop10
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 11 2002-03-20 01:13 loop11
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 12 2002-03-20 01:13 loop12
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 13 2002-03-20 01:13 loop13
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 14 2002-03-20 01:13 loop14
brw-rw----  1 root disk 7, 15 2002-03-20 01:13 loop15


On 6/27/06, Graham Campbell <gc1111@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 11:13 +0100, Dave Smif wrote:
> > That sounds like a bug to me then? Surely it should use a numerical
> > sort order in this case?
>
> This is exactly the behavior of the sort command.
> --
> Graham Campbell <gc1111@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users