Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU

To: "XEN User - listmembers" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU
From: "John Cianfarani" <jcianfarani@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 01:33:13 -0500
Cc: Stephan Seitz <s.seitz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 06:37:05 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-class:Date:Message-ID:X-MimeOLE:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:Thread-Topic:thread-index:From:To:Cc; b=srUiWtN76BXZUgKBssjUAloTUTllud3PKy15LEW7BGKIZH1lark7B9sVLkYZwW4WaBsaYorft4zjjCnEwLSGBemkuOW3qRMtJaP3afWU3NBnIYUkOUKMPgyBFRYP0ftpPqlmlanz9CwsMsB61wMegN5qD/lZ0C7m6cm6sdEqNsA= ;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZUL/9UlPuU43tiRp+oOq7PTc7y/AAXK2cQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU
Look into using heartbeat with DRBD failover would probably be less than
a few second hit.  Data would also be safe :)

This is better than trying to migrate a domU after the box has died... 

Thanks
John

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephan
Seitz
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 2:26 PM
To: XEN User - listmembers
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Smith schrieb:
> Nils Toedtmann wrote:
>>
>>
>> I remember reading that the only real difference between a dom0
>> and a domU kernel is the priviledge to have access to the
>> hypervisor. Why not declaring a special domU to a "fallback"
>> dom0? Not in the sense of having access to hw but control over
>> the hypervisor.
>>
>> That would help if the original dom0 userland dies, but it's
>> kernel keeps forwarding/bridging packets and blockdevice-I/O,
>> like Stephan's dom0 did.
>>
>> /nils.
>>
Thanks for this hint, Nils. I'll try to setup another test system with
two dom0's,
just to see if this is possible. I'll post results if this leads to a
running system.

> Hi,
>
> if this would be a problem you would have to deal with in the real
> world, you would have a identical box on another location and move
> the domU's to it and reboot the problem box.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Jan.
This was my first thought, but we didn't setup a fallback system (the
one, i
talked about, is just for testing purposes installed). Also, this
machine has all
it's filesystems on local disk, so a domU migration would last longer
than
driving to the colo. For live systems, i would also prefer this
scenario, but i think
this is not managable without the use of a NAS/SAN.

Greetings

Stephan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFELDDSsU1z66G/Ui4RAu9EAKCMWclUJReeM5WGRBaS05HrQmK10wCfRtQL
RHIjP0k/dy9ZxHaq3LwU4DQ=
=kTZE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [Xen-users] Re: Access Hypervisor Control from DomU, John Cianfarani <=