Re: [Xen-users] Is my xen-friendly glibc really faster?

To:	"Chris Fanning" <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-users] Is my xen-friendly glibc really faster?
From:	"Nicholas Lee" <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:28:11 +1300
Cc:	Ernst Bachmann <e.bachmann@xxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:28:44 +0000
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bYJI1sA1Bzb9uIo31qxrgg2k7mY6XXx5lidSQz8rkqDsNHlGYo9bPTG055bpSzbRDKlDQMAtyf/aoDiMsnCTEjFC5ytKn9oVI75fL5K+pFHEJ23DDie8oM2VVKktnq2Oi9GxTsZ50fC2TqnGSE93RTU/yBaQPmN9S7X5TOkuYHc=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<215ff4410602251030y297b73b0g96f3e032d637e06e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<215ff4410602211403t55192f15q9c2c20f02fb378b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200602212317.14351.e.bachmann@xxxxxxxx> <215ff4410602241319p2be97f32v6429bc96c6d259c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2b6116b30602241342l737c44e4r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <215ff4410602251030y297b73b0g96f3e032d637e06e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 26/02/06, Chris Fanning <christopher.fanning@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> > Moving the home dir to dom0 or native lvm device mount made that
> > problem go away.
> What do you mean by 'native'?

ie. mounting the lvm slice from the host0 direct using disks = [...].


> I've done all my testing on xen3 so it seems you need not test this yet ;)

Interesting as the network performance in Xen 3.0 between domUs does
seem better, at least for scp.  I guess there is still latency issues.

--
Nicholas Lee
http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users