Re: [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?

As far as I can tell using a xen patched kernel is FAR superior to running
unmodified linux, I can crash a VMX linux guest in a few minutes with just some
network stress tests (which also eat up 100% cpu of guest and host).

Stick with xen-patched non-VT linux guests is my suggestion.

Adam Wendt
IPCoast, Inc.

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:03 , Czakó_Krisztián <slapic@xxxxxxxxxxx> sent:

>Hello,
>
>What is the better solution now to run linux domUs under Xen3?
>Using a VT hardware, sould I install a xen-patched kernel as I would
>where no VT extension, or use an unmodified linux guest system?
>
>Is there any performance difference between a Pentium D 3 Ghz with vt
>(9xx) and without it (8xx)? 
>
>Regards,
>Slapic
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-users mailing list
>Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>





_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI, Alvin Starr

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Debian packages for xen3 + kernel images for dom0/U, Ralph Passgang

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?, Mark Williamson

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?, Daniel Stekloff

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]