Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew iss

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew issue
From: "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:36:06 +0800
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:45:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C40E9004.1E4D6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <FC1D1B23302A22499C60C967336B2AE0028B7951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C40E9004.1E4D6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciNk+8gVPQ6UlY+Q3imHZ2zMFtzTQA1gPlyAC47q+A=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew issue
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 24/3/08 09:46, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> This is today's nightly testing report; no new issue today. Most of
>> case failures are due to bug #1183 and #1194 listed below.
>> 
>> For bug #1194, the issue `Linux booting hangs with "hda: dma..."
>> errors` got fixed on this c/s; but neither Windows nor Linux X can
>> boot up with setting sdl=1 and opengl=1 if guest's resolution is set
>> as 800 * 600 or higher.
> 
> Haicheng,
> 
> I guess you do your testing offline, but do you have a feel for how
> fast guest installation is now compared with a few weeks ago (before
> mmio emulation changes)? I'm thinking it's slowed down rather a lot,
> at least on my old Pentium 4 test system. :-(

Keir, we checked guest installation with rhel4u3 today, we compared c/s
17284 with c/s 16720,
The result shows latest c/s with mmio emulation changes is a little bit
faster than before on our test system with Xeon(r) processors, about 20
seconds faster.


-- haicheng

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel