Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/

To: Bill Burns <bburns@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate
From: Bill Burns <bburns@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:06:55 -0500
Cc: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Carb, Brian A" <Brian.Carb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:09:02 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4798C97F.1040907@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C3B28FD7.1AD2B%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <478E2691.6060307@xxxxxxxxxx> <DD74FBB8EE28D441903D56487861CD9D26E6C368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4790A392.9040403@xxxxxxxxxx> <4798C97F.1040907@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20071129)
Bill Burns wrote:
> Bill Burns wrote:
>> Ian Pratt wrote:
>>>>>> No, I have not tried on 3.2.0. Will see if I can at some
>>>>>> point...
>>>>> Also, do you have any more info to share on what actually goes wrong
>>>> when
>>>>> dom0 has 'too much' memory?
>>>>>
>>>> The dom0 kernel spits out messages like the following starting around
>>>> the
>>>> init of cpu1 time, and periodically thereafter.
>>>>
>>>> Timer ISR/0: Time went backwards: delta=-50206266948
>>> delta_cpu=13733052
>>>> shadow=8186343367 off=13649733458 processed=72042343367
>>>> cpu_processed=21822343367
>>>>
>>>> Eventually just hanging (or making such slow progress to be
>>>> effectively hung).
>>> How many CPUs does the system have? Does the same large memory issue
>>> occur if you have fewer physical CPUs?
>>>
>> The system has 64 but is only built for 32, so the others are
>> ignored. Don't know if the problem happens with less CPUs at
>> this point. Hope to get more data soon...
>>
> 
> Interestingly, the symptom seems to disappear with a
> Hypervisor built to support all 64 CPUs. But I need to
> get more time on the system to say that for sure.
> 
Disregard the previous. It still happens. Continuing to debug..

 Bill



>  Bill
> 
> 
> 
>> Thanks,
>>  Bill
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>