RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -oneissue fixed

["Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>]

will timer_mode impact guest performance after a save/restore?
-Xin 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
>Sent: 2007年12月30日 0:14
>To: Cui, Dexuan; You, Yongkang; xen-devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: 
>#372 -oneissue fixed
>
>Not really. I'd perhaps get Xen to dump information about all 
>hvm_params and
>acceleration options and see if anythign has been dropped across the
>save/restore.
>
> -- Keir
>
>On 29/12/07 13:24, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On my host, for KernelBuild test, it may vary from 3% to 10%, but 30%
>> was also observed on others' hosts.
>> 
>> Any suggestion?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> -- Dexuan
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
>Keir Fraser
>> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 5:20 PM
>> To: You, Yongkang; xen-devel
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -
>> oneissue fixed
>> 
>> On 29/12/07 06:40, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> 6) HVM domain performance would downgrade, after doing save/restore.
>> 
>> How much does it downgrade by?
>> 
>>  -- Keir
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel