Re: [Xen-devel][VTD] 1:1 mapping for dom0 exhausts xenheap on x86/32 with 4G memory

[Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

alloc_domheap_page() instead of alloc_xenheap_page(), and use
map_domain_page() to get temporary mappings when you need them. This costs
nothing on x86/64, where all memory is permanently mapped. Or it is *very*
reasonable to only support vt-d on x86/64 hypervisor. That's the
configuration we care about by far the most, since 32-bit guests run fine on
a 64-bit hypervisor, and of course all vt-d systems will be 64-bit capable.

 -- Keir

On 28/9/07 06:26, "Han, Weidong" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> xenheap size is 9M on x86/32 xen, it's not enough to setup 1:1 page
> tables for dom0. It causes dom0 cannot boot successfully. Setup 1:1 page
> table in domheap still might be a problem since the thinking is to use
> the same 1:1 page table for both dom0 and PV domains. Currently I think
> of two options: 1) go back to original method, that's to say setup page
> table dynamically for dom0; 2) increase xenheap size on x86/32. How do
> you think about? Thanks.
> 
> Weidong


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel