RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][Retry 1] 4/4: cpufreq/PowerNow! in Xen:

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][Retry 1] 4/4: cpufreq/PowerNow! in Xen: PowerNow! changes
From:	"Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 16:24:35 -0500
Delivery-date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 14:26:34 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C2FDF44E.15192%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<200708301201.32030.mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx> <C2FDF44E.15192%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acfr5NmmGClNJFfYEdySawAX8io7RQAMFBbg
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] [PATCH][Retry 1] 4/4: cpufreq/PowerNow! in Xen: PowerNow! changes

> On 30/8/07 18:01, "Mark Langsdorf" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Patch 4 covers the changes necessary to the PowerNow! driver
> > to make it correctly associate shared cores under Xen.
> 
> Should we have a copy of that file in powernow-k8-xen.c? Can 
> the patched file work correctly in a native Linux build?

If I need to change one function in 
driver/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c (to use Rik's new getidletime
platform hypercall), do I need to make an entire new file or 
can I just add it inline?

-Mark Langsdorf
Operating System Research Center
AMD



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][Retry 1] 4/4: cpufreq/PowerNow! in Xen: PowerNow