Re: [Xen-devel] Windows XenU creation

To:	"Mark Williamson" <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Windows XenU creation
From:	shacky <shacky83@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:55:51 +0200
Delivery-date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:53:26 -0700
Dkim-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XDirrXXm4RifAONPyyMJhLnCcczBADlxVtXyWfUzM2Ei6rqoOCU7Tg7oOGy0NAcB8y87vXgjMcMuIi0z0Krxcq+4EYaYBXvw32x16JyRnLqqCzgEBAEAOvXK/dSJplC/117tAwAyGZX4GZDroq98efpVZA0FS6tMXGpwb4a/mFo=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PxncuBHUEakO7hDSnWt8ZQncsEisSoV+PsXs2BZNWTLg8NRDh+gcKYRybRWfnWt09gXiIUCizDC1Tn+1bIZaN0ssWym4GlNPmf7kJEeWIDsKgNtP26YKggrqxE8fCIyBgusY3KJ6UEWEkMh7RS+FiMB/JfmBVbgtlpFsEr+BJm8=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<200707310235.55819.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<7fedbc910707300918i64cd3d45s7c92da0d458156cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7fedbc910707301040o785535e9x6e74c0388d4f8e7e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7fedbc910707301144tc5725e1vf72459f20fbabc42@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200707310235.55819.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Well, there's probably the Xen Platform Device in there, which you wouldn't
> have the driver for unless you were running paravirtualised drivers (and
> there aren't any for Windows unless you're using some flavour XenEnterprise
> or Novell's new / upcoming Windows driver package).  It doesn't do any harm,
> you don't need the platform device to be recognised in order for everything
> to work.

So I can't find the drivers in any place?

> Wouldn't the first serial port be COM1 in Windows terminology, or am I being
> confused?  AFAIK, you can only have one virtual serial port at the moment.

Yes, the first serial port is COM1, but it is recognised as COM3...

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel