Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] STGI #UD exception

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] STGI #UD exception
From: mythbuster <embarbosa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:45:57 -0700 (PDT)
Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:20:24 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello all,

AMD manual states about STGI instruction:

"This instruction generates a #UD exception is SVM is not enabled."

However, if I execute in ring-0 the STGI instruction in my system with
EFER.SVME == 0, I receive a #GP exception instead of a #UD exception.
In other test, I just set the SVME bit to 1 and now I receive a #UD
exception! 

Is the manual wrong?

P.S.: My CPU obviously has the SVM extensions (AMD X2 4600+ AM2)
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/STGI--UD-exception-tf3949976.html#a11206287
Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>