Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Timer going backwards and Unable to handle kernel NULLpo

To: "Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Timer going backwards and Unable to handle kernel NULLpointer
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 18:02:45 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Robert Hulme <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 May 2007 09:00:12 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C283595A.FB55%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <465DB27A.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx> <C283595A.FB55%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 30.05.07 17:39 >>>
>On 30/5/07 16:20, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The box I'm looking at takes 600ms to enable ACPI mode
>
>!!! What does this entail? Is it some blob of AML? :-)

No, this is simply the port write (in acpi_hw_set_mode(), case 
ACPI_SYS_MODE_ACPI),
obviously followed by lengthy SMM execution.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel