Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] X86_64 and 4GB RAM using Flat Memory Model?

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] X86_64 and 4GB RAM using Flat Memory Model?
From: "John Hannfield" <hal9020@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:54:10 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 03:52:41 -0700
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eXowbwSu4qmHcLrRkemf3iMVcuJPeBtCYgYVGsKrcFK46UXwdHQqTZ8bAbEC4HQtrQn8OLPepL5PLC1SKTsk8sMuUQoS+G5kNBSDz6h1NHQv1Inff69vVGJfbzUKopiZEz+eUkGafVJwRGf5LodVizgV1F8QTe108FAFl4hMmog=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NGBHC2TIZ/mk0bbSgjmUji/IOf3+e6gUSjw6xgREfVnkYyPRMdDHNauEV5JKxlSpiLJ2mb910WI5JWjOoWPGOP412jX1QELJtfmlp06lkjWLemA7vz2nIbqyRGFM4Gb5ZaVpZtBH1zfKtKtfDWOtBtNQhneH9f5dDO71xK89jZs=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C25A192B.6883%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4d95b0990704280841m4ea3aecbqe6c24f67a93d6aad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C25A192B.6883%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, and the 'Address Range Descriptors' said the same thing. However, I
think the problem is that you ran grub from the command line. If you did,
displaymem just lies to you (making it completely pointless!).

Ahh, I see. Not very useful then!
I'll have access to the server on Tuesday, so will reboot at the grub prompt
and take a photo of the displaymem and report back.

Worth a shot...

Hopefully it's a bug, that the update will fix.
I'll let you know.
Thanks

--

John

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel