Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make x86_64 swiotlb code to support dma_ops [2/2

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make x86_64 swiotlb code to support dma_ops [2/2]
From: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:35:46 -0600
Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:35:12 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C20BA35C.3094%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1449F58C868D8D4E9C72945771150BDFD96682@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C20BA35C.3094%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcdbdXGgPI0XllCdQlK5GGtYpF745wACUWEGAAAzDmA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Make x86_64 swiotlb code to support dma_ops [2/2]
> On 28/2/07 20:17, "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The first patch creates the arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-dma-xen.c
> > file based on the standard pci-dma.c, and creates
> > arch/x86_64/kernel/swiotlb-xen.c based on
> > arch/i386/kernel/swiotlb.c.
> 
> Do we really need to duplicate the swiotlb code? Did you need 
> to make big changes?

No, the only change I made was to remove the swiotlb declaration
and export, which could have been done in pci-swiotlb-xen instead.

I made the move in case there needed to be any x86_64 specific
changes in the future, it would be easier to do so.  I understand
the need to balance that against keeping the code bases in sync
for common fixes.  I don't have a preference one way or the other.

> Other points that I can see from a quick browse include the fact that
> alloc_coherent() still looks broken afaics

The i386 swiotlb implementation doesn't seem to have an
alloc_coherent().  Since all this patch is intended to do
is move swiotlb into the x86_64 directory, I'm not sure
how to resolve the broken implementation.

> and the one-liner in io_apic-xen.c is a bit random
> (since none of the other use-iommu-or-not
> decision points are changed, and the GART stuff which is 
> presumably what is being kludged around is not even
> included in Xen builds yet).

Thanks for catching that.  I'll fix it in the next
revision.

-Mark Langsdorf
AMD, Inc.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel