Re: [Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?

To:	"Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?
From:	Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:01:22 +0000
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:01:05 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E1918@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<45C06737.5090700@xxxxxxxxx> <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E1918@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

At 13:55 +0100 on 31 Jan (1170251725), Petersson, Mats wrote:
> Shouldn't that be [j] in both places?

Yep; that's fixed in the staging tree, but hasn't made it to the public
tree yet.

Cheers,

Tim.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] 32/64 resotre broken, Zhai, Edwin [Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?, Petersson, Mats Re: [Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?, Tim Deegan <= RE: [Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?, Petersson, Mats

Previous by Date:	[Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?, Petersson, Mats
Next by Date:	RE: [Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?, Petersson, Mats
Previous by Thread:	[Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?, Petersson, Mats
Next by Thread:	RE: [Xen-devel] Cs 13594 - broken?, Petersson, Mats
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]