Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Call hypercall straightly from user space

To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Call hypercall straightly from user space
From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:30:21 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:30:12 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C1BC0C2B.6846%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Accr6PfCrVSZe50lQCCwjsW6cCTt7wAHH93IAAIsHRQAIW3ZIA==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Call hypercall straightly from user space
Keir Fraser write on 2006年12月30日 20:30:
> On 30/12/06 11:27 am, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> That being the case, perhaps you need a
>> well-defined register-based ABI for all ia64 hypercalls (e.g., first
>> N bytes of the first pointer-passed structs/values passed to a
>> hypercall are re-packed into a subset of the IA64's register space).
>> The disadvantage here is the need for IA64-specific repacking on the
>> Xen and the guest sides of the hypercall interface, unless we could
>> think of some very cunning way to avoid it.
> 
> Another option would be for the guest user space to know the
> virt->machine mapping for some of its address space, and use that as
> a pool to allocate hypercall buffers from. Then user space could fill
> in the xencomm descriptors for itself.
> 
> This would need special allocation in libxc for hypercall buffers
> (since they would need to come from a pinned pool of memory for which
> libxc knows the v->m mapping) but we want to add this anyway, even
> for x86 (to reduce number of mlock/munlock calls we make).


Thanks for your suggestions.
I would like to add another wrapper for some hypercalls, 
And after hypercall buffer is implemented, then I'll follow it.

Thanks,
Anthony

> 
>  -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel