Re: [Xen-devel] EFER in HVM guests

To:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] EFER in HVM guests
From:	Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:09:45 +0000
Delivery-date:	Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:09:52 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<456D940A.76E4.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AccTt6O34f2/wn+qEducNwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] EFER in HVM guests
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620

On 29/11/06 13:07, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is it intentional that
> - under SVM, 32-bit guests can freely set EFER.LME
> - under VMX, 32-bit guests can't access EFER at all?
> 
> Thanks, Jan

I'm sure any differences are unintentional. There is obviously scope for
making much of the MSR and CPUID code non-vmx/svm specific.

I assume that this particular difference doesn't really matter?

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel