Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] kexec: Reserve hypercall number

[Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 06:04:30PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 30/8/06 6:33 am, "Horms" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> this patch reserves a hypercall number for kexec,
> >> to ensure that it isn't a moving target.
> > 
> > I notice that since I sent this patch two new hypercall numbers
> > have been added, __HYPERVISOR_sysctl and __HYPERVISOR_domctl,
> > but this patch remains neither merged nor nacked.
> > 
> > Is reserving a hypercall number for kexec acceptable?
> 
> Yes, I've now done so.

Awsome, thanks.

-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel