Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Add CR8 virtualization

Wouldn't a switch() be more appropriate in mov_to_cr(), and moving
declaration and initialization of the added vlapic variables into just
the case 8 scope (or perhaps eliminate the variable altogether, and
just directly use VLAPIC(v))?

Jan

>>> "Xin, Xiaohui" <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx> 31.08.06 08:56 >>>
This patch adds CR8 virtualization. It's the initial patch for booting
HVM x64 Windows guest, and just let every CR8 access issues vmexit.

And later we will do acceleration to it.

 

Signed-off-by: Xiaohui Xin <xiaohui.xin@xxxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel][PATCH]Add CR8 virtualization, Xin, Xiaohui Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Add CR8 virtualization, Jan Beulich <= RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Add CR8 virtualization, Xin, Xiaohui

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] [patch 1/3] add xenbus_strstate(), Gerd Hoffmann

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [patch 2/3] Introduce new "online" node for backend drivers., Gerd Hoffmann

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel][PATCH]Add CR8 virtualization, Xin, Xiaohui

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel][PATCH]Add CR8 virtualization, Xin, Xiaohui

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]