Re: [Xen-devel] xenconsoled CPU denial of service problem

To:	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] xenconsoled CPU denial of service problem
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:13:48 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:14:41 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20060829155900.GC970@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcbMYAnNSJUYvjhTEdux/QAKle7CWA==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] xenconsoled CPU denial of service problem
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620



On 29/8/06 4:59 pm, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Finaly question - in the handle_ring_read() method is the port returned
> by xc_evtchn_pending guarrenteed to be same as port we already have a
> reference to in 'struct domain' local_port field ? If so I can remove
> the saved reference 'limited_port' I added in 'struct buffer'

Yes, that is guaranteed.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel