Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch] fix void* arithmetic

To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch] fix void* arithmetic
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 17:26:28 -0400
Cc: xen-ppc-devel <xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:27:15 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1156886315.29858.78.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1156883088.29858.69.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1156885583.5190.9.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1156886315.29858.78.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808)
Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 22:06 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:24 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
Hi Ian, I needed the following patch to avoid lots of these warnings:
        elf.c:238: warning: pointer of type `void *' used in arithmetic

Fix void* arithmetic warnings.
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks like PPC is the only arch using -Wpointer-arith, is there a reason
for that?

Is there are reason the other architectures *aren't* using it?

We have some extra warnings enabled because they've helped us in the
past (such as -Wshadow). Given that we're just playing janitor for
everyone else's code though, I think we're about to abandon that one.

Pointer arith is quite valid on void pointers, when using gcc and most other modern compilers.

Point of fact, any Linux kernel-related code REQUIRES that void* arith be valid, and not cause warnings.

As we see from your patch, all a cast to char* does is complicate the code, for zero gain.

        Jeff





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel