Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vnet-module

[Robert Valentan <R.Valentan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike Wray schrieb:
> Robert Valentan wrote:
>
> > patch_vnet_1
> >   Replacing the socketcall with direct calling the needed
> >   functions (my patch from 28.3)
> I don't like the idea of pasting all this code copied from elsewhere in
> the kernel.
> If the problem is that __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL is not defined, so
> there is no socketcall, then a better solution needs to be found.
x86_64 definies __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL, but has no entry-point for
it. A better solution will be an export of the needed functions in
net/socket.c ...  But where to get it ?

> In the worst case a copy of the relevant bits of socket.c defining 
> socketcall
> in a separate file with an #ifndef __ARCH_WANT_SYS_SOCKETCALL round it.
I havn't take a separate file, because my solution will also work for
the other systems. If you want a separate file, i will modify my patch,
but we need a permanent include, or need to use "__NR_socketcall"..

> > patch_vnet_2
> >   Modify the module-parameter for kernel 2.6.* (the old one
> >   will not compile with the actual kernel 2.6.16)
> >   Exporting the default-values of the parameters in /sys/module
> >
> > patch_vnet_3
> >   Some "extentions" to error-messages to identify the position
> >   in the code.
> >   I had searched a bug, but it was a wrong vnet-id ;-/
> >   A hint for docu: using "123459" as vnet-id has not 4 digits
> >   and will be punished with errors  ;-)
> The changes to the print functions are not needed - the debug macros
> in the code already include the function name. All you need to do
> is #define DEBUG 1. Check libxutil/debug.h. for the definitions.
Ohh..  thank you for the hint ;-/

--
wbr
Robert Valentan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel