Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] bitops on irq_cpustat_t->__softirq_pending

[Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 31 Mar 2006, at 13:03, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

> Makes sense. In fact I would say any array with NR_CPUS elements 
> should probably be in a per-cpu data area to avoid 
> "__cacheline_aligned" padding.
> However, we don't have a standard infrastructure for that in Xen right 
> now, and that means that IA64's hardirq.h, part of the weird 
> suck-in-headers-from-Linux thing, is radically different from x86 (and 
> thus PPC). And *that* means it's quite difficult to make any changes 
> to hardirq.h without fear of breaking the IA64 build.
I'm going to pull in percpu support after 3.0.2.

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel