Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting

To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] cpu steal time accounting
From: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:56:11 -0500 (EST)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 13:09:27 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD802C06D26@pdsmsx403>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <571ACEFD467F7749BC50E0A98C17CDD802C06D26@pdsmsx403>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Tian, Kevin wrote:

> Why do you need to add a new VCPUOP while doing same thing as 
> DOM0_GETVCPUINFO?

Because the dom0_ops only work for dom0 and reworking that
function to allow non-privileged domains to get info just
on themselves would end up being a way uglier patch.

-- 
All Rights Reversed

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel