Xen 
 
Home About Xen.org Xen Xen Summit Wiki Mailing List Bug Tracker Xen Downloads
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Essay on an important Xen decision (long)

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Essay on an important Xen decision (long)
From: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:22:31 +0000
Cc: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:41:43 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43C53164.2070308@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <516F50407E01324991DD6D07B0531AD59030F8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ca704ea5ca30b98dca4508cd6bfdf581@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <43C53164.2070308@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.1
> Is VP on x86 expensive in terms of performance or complexity?

One nasty thing for VP on x86 is the compulsory hardware PT walker - IA64 
allows the hypervisor to handle TLB fills on behalf of a guest, so that it 
can perform phys-to-machine translation.  IA64 has a hardware PT walker but 
you aren't *forced* to use it.

IIRC, PPC also performs P-to-M translations in the hypervisor, but I vaguely 
recall that happening during an explicit pagetable update hypercall - kind of 
a middle road between the x86 and IA64 approaches...  Some PPC guy may jump 
in and correct me at this point, though ;-)

> I imagine that you would have to always have shadow paging enable but
> you could still do bulk updates ala writable page tables so the
> performance cost should be minimal I would think.
>
> Trying to understand the memory system in more details so any additional
> info is much appreciate :-)

I don't see why that couldn't perform decently, although it'd have more 
overhead than allowing the guest to manage its pagetables directly...  I 
*thought* this was intended to be supported at some point, but I'm not sure 
if it's been needed yet.  Others may have more concrete numbers for the 
performance - I think writable PTs got benchmarked against shadowing at some 
point.

Cheers,
Mark

> Thanks,
>
> Anthony Liguori
>
> > If ia64 does decide to back off from the P==M route then I suspect VP
> > is the way to go (which is I think how ia64 domU's currently work
> > anyway).
> >
> >  -- Keir
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

-- 
> Just a question. What use is a unicyle with no seat?  And no pedals!
Me: To answer a question with a question: What use is a skateboard?
> Skateboards have wheels.
Me: My wheel has a wheel!

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>